Skip to main content
Log in

Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Evidence from Large Indian Manufacturing Organisations

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased globalisation has also seen increased scrutiny of corporate behaviour by the communities. Clearly managers are under increased pressure from stakeholders not only to outperform their competitors, but also are expected to do so in an ethical manner. In order to act ethically an individual is expected to have a well-developed moral imagination and moral reasoning. Literature on ethical reasoning research indicates a positive relationship between higher levels of moral reasoning and ethical behaviour. This paper presents the findings of a study of the moral reasoning/moral development of managers working in large manufacturing enterprises situated in the state of Punjab in India. Kohlberg’s theory of Cognitive Moral Development forms the basis of the study. Moral Judgement Interview (MIG) developed by Weber, on the basis of Kohlberg’s theory was used for the study. Moral Reasoning Scores were calculated using Abbreviated Scoring Guide. More than half of the managers scored at post-conventional level of reasoning while assessing the moral dilemmas. The reasoning scores varied for the three dilemmas.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Arnold, D. and L. A. Ponemon: 1991, ‘Internal Auditors; Perceptions of Whistle-Blowing and the Influence of Moral Reasoning: An Experiment’, Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory (Fall), 1–15

  • ATKearney: 2004, Location Attractiveness Index 2004- http://www.atkearney.com/shared_res/pdf/Making_ Offshore_S.pdf#search = ’at%20kearney’s%202004% 20offshore%20location%20attractiveness%20index’

  • Bay D., Greenberg R. R. (2001). The Relationship of the DIT and Behavior: A Replication. Issues in Accounting Education 16(3):367–380

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernardi, R.: 1991, ‘Fraud Detection: An Experiment Testing Differences in Perceived Client Integrity and Competence, Individual Auditor Cognitive Style and Experience, and accounting Firms’, An Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation (Union College, Schenectady, New York) (cited in Ryan, 2001)

  • Blasi A. (1980). Bridging Moral Cognition and Moral Action: A Critical Review of the Literature. Psychological Bulletin 88:1–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browning J., Zabriskie N. B. (1983). How ethical are industrial buyers?. Industrial Marketing Management 12:219–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, L. H. and P. M. Warton: 2001, ‘Voices of Moral Reasoning of Malaysian Students’, in Loo, S. P. (ed.), Educational Challenges in the New Millennium (Educational Research Association, Singapore), 3, pp. 1332–1340

  • Chockalingam V., Deshpande S.P. (1998). Do demographic Correlates of Ethical Perceptions Generalise to Non-American Samples: A Study of Managers in India. Cross Cultural Management 5(1):23–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby A., Kohlberg L. (1987). The Measurement of Moral Judgment, vol I–II. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Colby, A., L. Kohlberg, J. Gibbs, and M. Lieberman: 1983, ‘A Longitudinal Study of Moral Judgment’, in Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 48(series 200), 1–107

  • Collins D. (1989). Organisational harm, legal condemnation and stakeholder retaliation: A typology, research agenda and application. Journal of Business Ethics 8:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortese A. J. (1984). Standard Issue Scoring of Moral Reasoning: A Critique. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 30(3):227–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Elm D. R., Nichols M. L. (1993). An Investigation of the Moral Reasoning of Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 12:817–833

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elm D. R., Weber J. (1994). Measuring moral Judgment: The Moral Judgment Interview or Defining Issues Test. Journal of Business Ethics 13:341–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • England G. W. (1975). The Manager and his Values: An International Perspective. Ballinger Publishing Company, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Falkenberg A. W. (2004). When in Rome Moral Maturity and Ethics for International Economic Organisation. Journal of Business Ethics 54:17–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford C. R., Richardson W. R. (1994). Ethical decision making: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Business Ethics 13:205–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth D. R. (1980). A Taxonomy of Ethical Ideologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 39(1):175–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte A. (2004a). Business Ethics: A study of the Moral Reasoning of Selected Business Managers and the Influence of Organizational Ethical Climate. Journal of Business Ethics 51(2):167–173 Part 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forte A. (2004b). Antecedents of Managers Moral Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 51(4):315–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C. (1977). In a different voice: Women’s conception of the self and of morality. Harvard Educational Review 47:481–517

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C. (1979). Woman’s place in a man’s life cycle. Harvard Educational Review 49:431–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C. (1982a). In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, Harvard University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan C. (1982b). New maps of development: New visions of maturity. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 52:199–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goolsby J.R., Hunt S.D. (1992). Cognitive Moral Development and Marketing. Journal of Marketing 56:55–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haan N. (1977). Coping and defending: Processes of self-environment organization. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris H. (2001). Content analysis of secondary data: A study of courage in managerial decision making. Journal of Business Ethics 34(3–4):191–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison R. (1972). Understanding your organization’s character. Harvard Business Review 50(3):119–128

    Google Scholar 

  • Helkama K., Uutela A., Pohjanheimo E., Salminen S., Koponen A., Rantanen-Vantsi L. (2003). Moral Reasoning and Values in Medical School: A longitudinal study in Finland. Scandinavian Journal of Education Research 47(4):399–411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede G., Bond M. H. (1984). Hofstede’s cultural dimensions: An Independent validation using Rokeach’s value survey. Journal of Cross-cultural Psychology 15:417–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Holstein C. B. (1976). Irreversible, stepwise sequence in the development of moral judgment: A longitudinal study of males and females. Child Developement 47:51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunt S. D., Vitell S. J. (1986). A General Theory of Marketing Ethics. Journal of Macromarketing 6(1):5–16, Spring

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglehart R., Baker W. E. (2000). Modernisation, cultural change, and the persistence of traditional values. American Sociological Review 65:19–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson J. (1996). An Introduction to Business Ethics. Blackwell Publishers Ltd, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeffery C. (1993). Ethical Development of Accounting Students, Non-Accounting Business Students and Liberal Art Students. Issues in Accounting Education 5:195–208

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issue contingent model. Academy of Management Review 16:366–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones T. M., Gautschi F. H. (1988). Will Ethics of Business Change? A survey of future executives. Journal of Business Ethics 7:231–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kite D., Louwers T., Radtke R. (1996). Ethics and Environmental Auditing: An Investigation of Environmental Auditors’ Levels of Moral Reasoning. Behavioral Research in Accounting 8(supplement):200–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1969). Stage and Sequence, Handbook of Socialization Theory and Research. Rand McNally, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1976). Moral Stages and Moralization; the Cognitive Developmental Approach. In: Lickona T. (eds). Moral Development and Behavior. Holt Rinehart, and Winston, New York, pp. 31–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1984). Essays in Moral Development, Volume II: The Psychology of Moral Development. Harper and Row, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg L. (1986). A Current Statement on Some Theoretical Issues. In: Modgil S., Modgil C. (eds). Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy. Falmer press, Philadelphia, pp. 485–546

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. A. Colby: 1983, ‘Reply to Fischer and Saltzstein’, Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development 48(1/2, series 200), 120–124

  • Kohlberg L., Levine C., Hewer A. (1983). Moral stages: a current formulation and a response to critics. Karger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane M. S., Schaupp D., Parsons B. (1988). Pygmalion effect: An issue for business education and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 7:223–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lifton, P. D.: 1985, ‘Individual Differences in Moral Development: A Relation of Sex, Gender and Personality to Morality’, Journal of Personality 53(2), 306–334

    Google Scholar 

  • Logsdon J. M., Yuthas K. (1997). Corporate Social Performance, Stakeholder Orientation and Organisational Moral Development. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1213–1226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovell A. (1995). Moral reasoning and moral atmosphere in the domain of accounting. Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal 8(3):60–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra, A.: 1985, ‘Value Erosion Among Indian Managers’, Business India (Jan) 14–27

  • Mellahi K. (2001). Differences and Similarities in Future Managerial Values: A Five Cultures Comparative Study. Cross Cultural Management 8 (1):45–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Modgil S., Modgil C. (eds) (1986). Lawrence Kohlberg: Consensus and Controversy. Philadelphia, Falmer Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Monappa A. (1977). Ethical Attitudes of Indian Managers. All India Management Association, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunner-Winkler G. (1984). Two Moralities? A Critical Discussion of an Ethic of Care and Responsibility vs. and Ethic of Rights and Justice. In: Kurtines W. M., Gewirtz T. A. (eds). Morality, Moral Behavior and Moral Development. Wiley, New York, pp. 348–361

    Google Scholar 

  • Pennino C. M. (2002). Is decision Style Related to Moral Development Among Managers in the U.S.?. Journal of Business Ethics 41:337–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, J. A. and G. E. Manning: 1990, ‘Developing and Ethical Climate for Excellence’, The Journal for Quality and Participation (March), 84–90

  • Piaget J. (1932). The moral judgment of the child. New York, Free Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon L. A. (1990). Ethical Judgments in Accounting: A Cognitive Developmental Perspective. Critical Perspectives in Accounting 1:191–215

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ponemon, L. A. and D. R. Gabhart: 1990, ‘Auditor Independence Judgments: A Cognitive Development Model and Experimental Evidence’, Contemporary Accounting Research 7(1), 227–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest M. (1986). Moral Development; Advances in research and theory. Praeger, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1994, ‘Background: Theory and Research’, in Rest, J. R. and D. Narváez (eds.), Moral Development in the Professions (Erlbaum, Hillsdale NJ), pp. 1–26

  • Ryan J. J. (2001). Moral Reasoning as a Determinant of Organizational Citizenship Behaviors: A Study in the Public Accounting Profession. Journal of Business Ethics 33:233–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sethi P. S., Steidlmeier P. (1993). Religion’s Moral Compass and a Just Economic Order: Reflections on Pope John Paul II’s Encyclical Centesimus Annus. Journal of Business Ethics 12(12):901–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaub M. K. (1994). An Analysis of the Association of the Traditional Demographic Variables with the Moral Reasoning of Auditing Students and Auditors. Journal of Accounting Education 12:1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snarey J. R. (1985). Cross-Cultural Universality of Social- Moral Development: A Critical Review of Kohlbergian Research. Psychological Bulletin 97:202–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soon L. G. (2003). Differences in Ethical Judgement between Chinese and Singaporeans: Individual Reactions to Self and Organizational Interest Considerations. Singapore Management Review 25(2):1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Sridhar B. S., Camburn A. (1993). Stages of Moral development in Organisations. Journal of Business Ethics 12:727–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney J. T., Fisher D. G. (1998). An Examination of the validity of a new measure of moral judgement. Behavioural Research in Accounting 10:138–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review 11(3):601–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Nelson K. A. (1999). Managing Business Ethics- Straight Talk About How To Do It Right. John Wiley & Sons, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino L. K., Youngblood S. A (1990). Bad Apples in Bad Barels: A causal Analysis of Ethical Decision- Making Behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology 4:378–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsui J., Windsor C. (2001). Some Cross-Cultural evidence on Ethical Reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 31:143–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uddin N., Gillet P. R. (2002). The Effects of Moral Reasoning and Self –Monitoring on CFO Intentions to Report Fraudulently on Financial Statements. Journal of Business Ethics 40:15–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venezia, C. C.: 2005, ‘The Ethical Reasoning Abilities of Accounting Students’, The Journal of American Academy of Business March 2005, 200– 207

  • Werhane P. H. (1998). Moral Imagination and the Search for Ethical Decision Making in Management. Business Ethics Quarterly Ruffin Series 1:75–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker L. (1984). Sex differences in the development of moral reasoning: A critical review. Child Development 55:677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker L., de Vries B., Trevethan S.D. (1987). Moral Stages and Moral orientations in Real-Life and Hypothetical Dilemmas. Child Development 58:842–858

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warming-Rasmussen B., Windsor C.A. (2003). Danish Evidence of Auditors’ Level of Moral Reasoning and Predisposition to Provide fair Judgments. Journal of Business Ethics 47:77–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, J.: 1988, ‘The Relationship Between Managerial Value Orientations and Stages of Moral Development: Theory Development and Empirical Investigation with Behavioural Implications’, Unpublished Dissertation (University of Pittsburgh)

  • Weber, J.: 1989, ‘Managers’ Moral Reasoning: An Exploratory Look at Managers’ Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas’, Academy of Management Proceedings, 333–337

  • Weber J. (1990). Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Assessing Their Responses to Three Moral Dilemmas. Human Relations 43(7):687–702

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. (1991). Adapting Kohlberg to enhance the assessment of managers’ moral reasoning. Business Ethics Quarterly 1(3):293–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber J. (1996). Influences Upon Managerial Moral decision-making: Nature of Harm and Magnitude of Consequences. Human Relations 49(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber J., Wasieleski D. (2001). Investigating Influences on Managers’ Moral Reasoning. Business and Society 40(1):79–113

    Google Scholar 

  • White R. D. (1999). Organisational Design and Ethics: The effects of Rigid Hierarchy on Moral Reasoning. International Journal of Organisational theory and Behaviour 2(3&4):431–456

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood J. A., Longenecker J. G., McKinney J. A., Moore C. W. (1988). Ethical attitudes of students and business professionals: A study of moral reasoning. Journal of Business Ethics 7:249–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manjit Monga.

Additional information

Manjit Monga is a lecturer in the School of Management, at the Division of Business, University of South Australia. Her research interests are in the area of management and workplace ethics, organisational culture, research ethics and resource management.

The aythor is a lecturer in the School of Mangement, at the Division of Business,University of South Australia. Her research interests are in the area of mangement and workplace ethics,organisational culture,research ethics and human resource mangement.

Appendices

Appendix 1: Vignettes used in the study

Instructions to the respondents

(These instructions were read out and explained to the respondents and were provided as first page of the MJI).

The MJI consists of several stories that we believe present some challenges issues. Some of you might choose one solution to the stories, others of you may choose another. We are primarily interested in the explanations or reasons you give for your decisions. Try to justify and explain your statements as fully as possible. Very short answers are of no help to us, so be sure to elaborate fully. Use the backside of the provided to complete your answers if necessary. Keep in mind that we are more interested in your answers to the why questions than to what questions. Even if you give a long description of what you think is right or what think should be done, it is of no help if you do not explain why you think it should be done. Answer each question the best you can. Please do not compare an answer to prior answers.

Please begin the MJI by reading the first story on the next page.

These are the same as those used by Weber (1989) with the names changed from Heinz, Evelyn and Roger, the money values changed to Rupees, and the location, where it is specifically mentioned, to India.

Vignette 1 (Rajesh/Heinz)

In India, a woman was nearing death from a special kind of cancer. There was one drug that the doctors thought might save her. It was a form of radium that a druggist in the same town had recently discovered.

The drug was expensive to make, but the druggist was charging ten times what the drug cost him to make. He paid Rs 400 for the radium and charged Rs 4,000 for a small dose of the drug.

The sick woman’s husband, Rajesh, went to everyone he knew to borrow the money and tried every legal means, but he could only get together about Rs 2,000, which was half of what it cost.

He told the druggist that his wife was dying, and asked him to sell it cheaper or let him pay later. But the druggist said, “No, I discovered the drug and I’m going to make money from it”. So having tried every legal means, Rajesh gets desperate and considers breaking into the man’s store to steal the drug for his wife.

Questions

  1. 1.

    Should Rajesh steal the drug? (Yes or No) Why, or why not?

  2. 2.

    Does it make a difference whether or not he loves his wife?

  3. 3.

    Suppose the person dying is not his wife but a stranger? Should Rajesh steal the drug for the stranger?

  4. 4.

    Suppose the only chance Rajesh had to acquire the money is to steal funds from his employer. Should Rajesh steal his employer’s money to purchase the drug?

  5. 5.

    Is it important for people to do everything they can to save another’s life? Explain.

  6. 6.

    It is against the law for Rajesh to steal. Does that make it morally wrong?

  7. 7.

    In general, should people try to do everything they can to obey the law?

Vignette 2 (Kavita/Evelyn)

Kavita worked for an automotive steel casting company. She was part of a small group asked to investigate the cause of an operating problem that had developed in the wheel castings of a new luxury automobile and to make recommendations for its improvement. The problem did not directly create an unsafe condition, but it did lead to irritating sounds. The Vice President of Engineering told the group that he was certain that the problem was due to tensile stress in the castings.

Kavita and a lab technician conducted tests and found conclusive evidence that the problem was not tensile stress. As Kavita began work on other possible explanations of the problem, she was told that the problem had been solved. A report prepared by Kavita’s boss strongly supported the tensile stress hypothesis. All of the data points from Kavita’s experiments have been changed to fit the curves, and some of the points, which were far from where the theory would predict, have been omitted. The report “proved" that tensile stress was responsible for the problem.

Questions

  1. 1.

    Should Kavita contradict her boss’s report? (Yes or No) Why, or why not?

  2. 2.

    Should the potential conflict with Kavita’s boss have any impact on Kavita ’s actions? Why, or why not?

  3. 3.

    If the report supporting the tensile stress hypothesis was issued by the lab technician working on the project, should Kavita contradict the report?

  4. 4.

    Is it important that people do everything they can to have the truth known? Explain.

  5. 5.

    Suppose the problem with the brake involved more than irritating sounds. Would it make a difference if the brake problem caused uneven brake applications and skids, which could lead to possible human injury?

  6. 6.

    The data in the boss’s report are false. Does it make it morally wrong if Kavita fails to contradict the report?

  7. 7.

    Should people do everything they can to work within the corporate organisation and support their superiors?

Vignette 3 (Abhijit/Roger)

Abhijit worked for a small auditing firm and conducted an annual audit of a machinery manufacturer. During the audit he discovered that the firm had received a large loan from the local savings and loan association. It was illegal for a savings and loan association to make a loan to a manufacturing firm; they were restricted by the law at that time to mortgages based upon residential real estate.

Abhijit took his working papers and a xerox copy of the ledger showing the loan to his boss, the partner in charge of the auditing office. His boss listened to, and then told Abhijit: “I will take care of this privately. We simply cannot afford to lose a client of this status. You put the papers you have through the shredder”.

Questions

  1. 1.

    Should Abhijit shred his papers? (Yes or No) Why, or why not?

  2. 2.

    Does the illegality of the loan and Abhijit’s duty as an auditor make a difference in Abhijit ’s decision to shred his papers?

  3. 3.

    If Abhijit had been advised by one of his peers to shred his papers, should Abhijit shred his papers?

  4. 4.

    Is it important for people to do everything they can to follow their conscience? Explain.

  5. 5.

    Shredding papers is against the AICPA Code and covers up an illegally made loan. Is Abhijit also morally wrong if he shreds his papers?

  6. 6.

    What if Abhijit’s career was threatened if he refused to shred his papers?

  7. 7.

    Should people do everything they can to further their own careers?

Appendix 2: Abbreviated Scoring Guide

Stage orientation-moral reasoning explanation (Weber, 1991)

Table 1

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Monga, M. Managers’ Moral Reasoning: Evidence from Large Indian Manufacturing Organisations. J Bus Ethics 71, 179–194 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9133-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-006-9133-2

Keywords

Navigation