Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-c4f8m Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-24T01:18:01.857Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

RELUCTANT SOLDIERS: THE MORAL DILEMMA OF AN UNJUST WAR

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2010

Get access

Extract

If called upon would you fight in a war you thought unjust? This article attempts to explain why the majority of military officers and soldiers when faced with this question do fight despite moral misgivings they may have. I will explain why on one hand officers are morally obligated to refuse unjust orders in jus in bello cases, but on the other hand it can be argued that they are also obligated to follow orders they believe to be unjust concerning jus ad bellum. The war in Iraq has and continues to presents military officers and their soldiers with a particularly difficult moral dilemma. As citizens of a democratic government it is important that we understand why our military officers act in ways that may seem counter to what we believe is right.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Further reading

Christopher, Paul. The Ethics of War and Peace: an Introduction to Legal and Moral Issues. Englewoods Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, 1994.Google Scholar
Huntington, Samuel. The Soldier and the State: The Theory and Politics of Civil-Military Relations. Cambridge, Harvard University Press, 1957.Google Scholar
Vitoria, Francisco de. Vitoria: Political Writings (ed.) Pagden, Antohony, Lawrence, Jeremy., Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1992.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustrations. New York, Basic Books, 2000.Google Scholar