Skip to main content
Log in

A Critical Review of Matthew Clayton: Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing

Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 2006, 214 p., Hardcover, List Price: $74.00, Last Price: $95.68

  • Critical Review
  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Notes

  1. All page references are to Clayton (2006) unless clearly indicated otherwise.

  2. Hankivsky’s discussion of the need and implications of taking care seriously in social policy is especially valuable. Chapter 1 of her monograph defends the claim that we must “recognize the value and uniqueness of the care ethic” in order to combine it with the “values of justice to ensure a balanced and reasoned resolution of practical issues and social problems” (Hankivsky 2004, p. 25).

  3. See Morgan (1996).

References

  • Archard, D. (1993). Children: Rights and childhood. Routledge.

  • Archard, D. (2003). Children, family and the state. Ashgate.

  • Brighouse, H. (2000). School choice and social justice. Oxford University Press.

  • Callan, E. (1997). Creating citizens: Political education and social justice. Oxford University Press.

  • Clayton, M. (2006). Justice and legitimacy in upbringing. Oxford University Press.

  • Galston, W. (2002). Liberal pluralism: The implications of value pluralism for political theory and practice. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hankivsky, O. (2004). Social policy and the ethic of care. UBC Press.

  • Hill, T. (1991). Autonomy and self-respect. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hinman, L. (2003). Ethics: A pluralistic introduction to moral theory (4th edn.). Harcourt.

  • James, W. (1956). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy. Dover Publications.

  • Kershaw, P. (2005). Carefair: Rethinking the responsibilities and rights of citizenship. UBC Press.

  • Levinson, M. (1999). The demands of liberal education. Oxford University Press.

  • Morgan, J. (1996). A defense of autonomy as an educational ideal. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 30(2), 239–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, J. (2006). Children’s rights and the parental authority to instill a specific value system. Essays in Philosophy, 7(1). http://www.humboldt.edu/~essays/morgan.html.

  • Noggle, R. (2002). Special agents: Children’s autonomy and parental authority. In D. Archard & C. McLeod (Eds.), The moral and political status of children. Oxford University Press.

  • Rawls, J. (1996). Political liberalism. Columbia University Press.

  • Rorty, A., & Wong, D. (1990). Aspects of character and agency. In O. Flanagan & A. Rorty (Eds.), Identity and character in morality: Essays in moral psychology. MIT Press.

  • Swift, A. (2003). How not to be a hypocrite: School choice for the morally perplexed parent. Routledge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeffrey Morgan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, J. A Critical Review of Matthew Clayton: Justice and Legitimacy in Upbringing. Stud Philos Educ 28, 79–89 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-008-9103-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-008-9103-5

Navigation