Skip to main content
Log in

Can small groups avoid the tragedy of the commons?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, an agent-based simulation seeks to discuss the tragedy of the commons, collective intelligence and institutions developed by social groups. The concept of the tragedy of the commons states that you can always expect environmental degradation when many individuals freely exploit a scarce resource of common use. Hardin (Science 162:1243–1248, 1968) proposes two alternatives to deal with it: state or privatized administration. However, it is possible another alternative of self-coordination when the social groups are small. That is, the tragedy of the commons could be faced when the synergy within the group—collective intelligence—develops. The focus of this paper is to analyze small groups who promote their coordination to achieve collective goals, aimed at the preservation and perpetuation of scarce natural resources of common use. The results of this research show that the extreme exhaustion of the environment and consequent dissolution of the group that depends on it, is easily observed in many circumstances. However, in small groups, the self-coordination through the development of strong institutions may avoid an eventual tragic outcome of total environment degradation. Additionally, it has been found that social identity influences the behavior of the individuals, determining the social structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agrawal A (2014) Studying the commons, governing common-pool resource outcomes: some concluding thoughts. Environ Sci Policy 36:86–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akerlof GA, Kranton RE (2000) Economics and identity. Q J Econ 115(3):715–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashforth BE, Mael F (1989) Social identity theory and the organisation. Acad Manag Rev 14(1):20–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod RM (1997). The complexity of cooperation: Agent-based models of competition and collaboration. Princeton University Press, Princeton

  • Azevedo AI, Martins HT, Drummond JAL (2009) A dinâmica institucional de uso comunitário dos produtos nativos do cerrado no município de Japonvar (Minas Gerais). Sociedade e Estado 24(1):193–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger P, Luckmann T (1967) The social construction of reality: a treatise in the sociology of knowledge. Anchor, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Bezlepkina I, Brouwer F, Reidsma P (2014) Impact assessment of land use policies: introduction. Land Use Policy 37:1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blader SL, Tyler TR (2009) Testing and extending the group engagement model: linkages between social identity, procedural justice, economic outcomes, and extra role behavior. J Appl Psychol 94(2):445–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brinton M, Victor Nee (1998) The new institutionalism in sociology. Russell Sage Foundation, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley KM (2009) Computational modeling for reasoning about the social behaviour of humans. Comput Math Organ Theory 15:47–59

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Centola D, Willer R, Macy M (2005) The emperor’s dilemma: a computational model of self-enforcing norms. Am J Sociol 110(4):1009–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen R, Chen Y (2011) The potential of social identity for equilibrium selection. Am Econ Rev 101(6):2562–2589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cole DH, Epstein G, McGinnis MD (2014) Digging deeper into Hardin’s pasture: the complex institutional structure of ‘the tragedy of the commons’. J Inst Econo 10(3):353–369

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis LE, North DC (1971) Institutional change and American economic growth. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio PJ, Powell WW (1983) The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. Am Sociol Rev 48:147–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dinger V, Steinkamp S, Westermann F (2014) The tragedy of the commons and inflation Bias in the Euro area. Open Econ Rev 25:71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein JM, Axtell R (1996) Growing artificial societies: social science from bottom up. The Brookings Institution, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Falk T, Vollan B, Kirk M (2014): Tragedy of the commons. In: Morin JF, Orsini A (eds.) Essential concepts of global environmental governance. Routledge, Abingdon

  • Feeny D, Berkes F, McCay BJ, Acheson JM (1990) The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Human ecology 18(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fioretti G (2012) Agent-based simulation: models in organisation Science. Organ Res Methods 16(2):227–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ford A (2010) Modelling the environment. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Furubotn EG, Richter R (2008) The new institutional economics: a different approach to economic analysis. Economic Affairs 28(3):15–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghaffarzadegan N, Lyneis J, Richardson GP (2011) How small system dynamics models can help the public policy process. Syst Dyn Rev 27(1):22–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Gotts NM, Polhill JG, Law ANR (2003) Agent-based simulation in the study of social dilemmas. Artif Intell Rev 19(1):3–92

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Sociol 78(6):1930–1938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison JR, Carroll GR, Carley KM (2007) Simulation modelling in organisational and management research. Acad Manag Rev 32(4):1229–1245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinkle S, Brown R (1990) Intergroup comparisons and social identity: some links and lacunae. Soc Identity Theory 48:70

    Google Scholar 

  • Karnani A (2014) Corporate social responsibility does not avert the tragedy of the commons. Case study: Coca-Cola India. Econ Manag Financ Markets 9(3):11–33

  • Leimeister JM (2010) Collective intelligence. Bus Inform Syst Eng 2(4):245–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mantzavinos C, North DC, Shariq S (2004) Learning, institutions, and economic performance. Perspect Polit 2(1):75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manzungu E, Mangwanya L, Dzingirai V (2012) Can collective action lead to sustainable outcomes in the provision and management of domestic water in Zimbabwean urban areas? J Sustain Dev 5(5):65–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nixon R (2015) Neoliberalism, Genre and “The Tragedy of the Commons”. In: Bernard A, Elmarsafy Z, Murray S (eds) What postcolonial theory doesn’t say. Routledge: Collection “Routledge Research in Postcolonial Literatures”

  • North DC (1991) Institutions. J Econ Perspect 5(1):97–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak A, Rychwalska A, Borkowski W (2013) Why simulate? To develop a mental model. J Artif Soc Soc Simul 16(312):1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson M (1971) The logic of collective action: public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pinho PF, Orlove B, Lubell M (2012) Overcoming barriers to collective action in community-based fisheries management in the Amazon. Hum Organ 71(1):99–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarker A, Ikeda T, Abe T, Inoue K (2015) Design principles for managing coastal fisheries commons in present-day Japan. Ecol Econ 117:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmid AA (2007) Conflict and cooperation: institutional and behavioural economics. Land Econ 83(2):280–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuler D (2008) Civic intelligence and the public sphere. In: Toovey M (ed) Collective intelligence: creating a prosperous world at peace. Earth Intelligence Network, Oakton

    Google Scholar 

  • Toyokawa W, Kim H, Kameda T (2014) Human collective intelligence under dual exploration-exploitation dilemmas. PLoS One 9(4):e95789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uhrmacher AM (1996). Object-oriented, agent-oriented simulation: implications for social science applications. In: Troitzsch KG et al. (Org.). Social science micro simulation: a challenge for computer science. Berlin: Springer Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems

  • Wang H, Shao J, Cai M (2014) Is self-governance of the commons feasible in the PRC? A case study of pasture governance in Zhua Xixiulong township, Gansu province. Asia Pac J Pub Adm 36(3):211–219

    Google Scholar 

  • Woolley AW, Chabris CF, Pentland A, Hashmi N, Malone TW (2010) Evidence for a collective intelligence factor in the performance of human groups. Science 330(6004):686–688

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zagonel AA, Rohrbaugh J, Richardson GP, Andersen DF (2004) Using simulation models to address “what if” questions about welfare reform. J Pol Anal Manag 23(4):890–901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang W, Zeng W, Fu X, Pan J (2011) Economic analysis on the tragedy of the river. J Manag Sustain 1(1):124–132

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rogerio Scabim Morano.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Morano, R.S., de Moraes, E.A. & Jacomossi, R.R. Can small groups avoid the tragedy of the commons?. AI & Soc 33, 71–80 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0720-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0720-9

Keywords

Navigation