Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Epistemic semantics for counterfactuals

  • Published:
Journal of Philosophical Logic Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1986. ‘Belief Revisions and the Ramsey Test for Conditionals’, Philosophical Review 95.

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1987. ‘Variations on the Ramsey Test: More Triviality Results’, Studia Logica 46.

  • Gärdenfors, P.: 1988. Knowledge in Flux, Bradford Books, MIT Press.

  • Hansson, S.: 1989. ‘New Operators for Theory Change’, Theoria 55 (2).

  • Lewis, D.: 1976. ‘Probabilities of Conditionals and Conditional Probabilities’, Philosophical Review 85.

  • Makinson, D.: 1990. ‘The Gärdenfors Impossibility Theorem in Nonmonotonic Contexts’, Studia Logica.

  • Segerberg, K.: 1989. ‘A Note on an Impossibility Theorem of Gärdenfors’, Noûs XXIII (3).

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1968. ‘A theory of conditionals’, in N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series, 2, Basil Blackwell, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stalnaker, R.: 1976. ‘Indicative Conditionals’, in A. Kasher (ed.), Language in Focus, Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tichy, P.: 1976. ‘A Counterexample to the Stalnaker-Lewis Analysis of Counterfactuals’, Philosophical Studies 29.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institut für Maschinelle Sprachverarbeitung, Universität Stuttgart, Keplerstrasse 17, D-7000, Stuttgart 1, Germany

    Michael Morreau

Authors
  1. Michael Morreau
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morreau, M. Epistemic semantics for counterfactuals. J Philos Logic 21, 33–62 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126496

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00126496

Search

Navigation