Skip to main content
Log in

In defense of Methodological Solipsism: A reply to Noonan

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Blackburn, Simon: 1979, ‘Thoughts and Things’, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume LIII, pp. 23–41.

  • Dennett, D. C.: 1982, ‘Beyond Belief’, in Woodfield (ed.), Thought and Object, pp. 1–96.

  • Evans, Gareth: 1982, The Varieties of Reference (ed.) John McDowell (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fodor, J. A.: 1980, ‘Methodological Solipsism Considered as a Research Strategy in Cognitive Psychology’, Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, pp. 63–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, Colin: 1982, The Character of Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noonan, H. W.: 1981, ‘Methodological Solipsism’, Philosophical Studies 4, pp. 269–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Hilary: 1975, ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”,’ in Putnam, Mind, Language and Reality, pp. 215–71.

  • Putnam, Hilary: 1975, Mind, Language and Reality: Philosophical Papers, Vol. 2 (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodfield, Andrew (ed.): 1982, Thought and Object (Clarendon Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morris, K.J. In defense of Methodological Solipsism: A reply to Noonan. Philosophical Studies 45, 399–411 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355446

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00355446

Keywords

Navigation