Skip to main content
Log in

Naturalized metaphilosophy

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Traditional representations of philosophy have tended to prize the role of reason in the discipline. These accounts focus exclusively on ideas and arguments as animating forces in the field. But anecdotal evidence and more rigorous sociological studies suggest there is more going on in philosophy. In this article, we present two hypotheses about social factors in the field: that social factors influence the development of philosophy, and that status and reputation—and thus social influence—will tend to be awarded to philosophers who offer rationally compelling arguments for their views. In order to test these hypotheses, we need a more comprehensive grasp on the field than traditional representations afford. In particular, we need more substantial data about various social connections between philosophers. This investigation belongs to a naturalized metaphilosophy, an empirical study of the discipline itself, and it offers prospects for a fuller and more reliable understanding of philosophy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen, C., Buckner, C., & Niepert, M. (2008). InPhO on the web. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from the Indiana Philosophy Ontology project’s Web site: http://inpho.cogs.indiana.edu.

  • Antony L.M. (1991) Quine as feminist: The radical import of naturalized epistemology. In: Antony L.M., Witt C. (eds) A mind of one’s own. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 185–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Barabási A.-L. (2002) Linked: The new science of networks. Perseus, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Blatti, S. (2008). Placement data. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from De Dicto: http://dedicto.blogspot.com/2008/05/recent-placement-data-of-top-30.html.

  • Bloor D. (1976/1991) Knowledge and social imagery. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan M. (2002) Nexus: Small worlds and the groundbreaking science of networks. Norton, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (2008). Australasian philosophy family tree. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from David Chalmers’ Web site: http://consc.net/tree.html.

  • Cohen G. A. (2000) If you’re an egalitarian, how come you’re so rich. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins R. (1998) The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dever, J. (2008). The philosophy family tree. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from The University of Texas at Austin Web site: https://webspace.utexas.edu/deverj/personal/philtree/philtree.html.

  • Devitt M. (1991) Realism and truth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditto P. H., Lopez D. F. (1992) Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(4): 568–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ditto P. H., Scepansky J. A., Munro G. D., Apanovitch A. M., Lockhart L. K. (1998) Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(1): 53–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Festinger L. (1950) Informal social communication. Psychology Review 57(5): 271–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer P., Jonas E., Frey D., Schulz-Hardt S. (2005) Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology 35: 469–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fung Y. (1948) A short history of Chinese philosophy: A systematic account of Chinese thought from its origins to the present day. The Free Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafman J., Goel V. (2002) Neural basis of reasoning and thinking. Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hays-Gilpin K., Whitley D. (eds) (1998) Reader in gender archaeology. Routledge, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy S. (1981) The woman that never evolved. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull D. L. (1988) Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller E. F. (1983) A felling for the organism. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Keller E.F. (1985) The force of the pacemaker concept in theories of aggregation in cellular slime mold. In: Keller E.F. (eds) Reflections on gender and science. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp 150–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P. (1990) The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy 87: 5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitcher P. (1993) The advancement of science. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Kruglanski A. W., Pierro A., Mannetti L., De Grada E. (2006) Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Pychological Review 113(1): 84–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn T.S. (1977) Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In: Kuhn T.S. (eds) The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 320–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour B., Woolgar S. (1979/1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd E. (1993) Pre-theoretical assumptions in evolutionary explanations of female sexuality. Philosophical Studies 69: 139–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longino H., Doell R. (1983) Body, bias, and behavior: A comparative analysis of reasoning in two areas of biological science. Signs 9: 206–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morrow, D., & Sula, C. A. (2008). The phylosophy project (phylo). Retrieved May 31, 2008, from The Phylosophy Project’s Web site: http://www.phylosophy.net.

  • Nickerson R. S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2(2): 175–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam H. (1978) Meaning and the moral sciences. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosvall M., Bergstrom C.T. (2007) Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(4): 1118–1123. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706851105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell B. (1912/1997) Problems of philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sklar L. (1981) Do unborn hypotheses have rights. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62: 17–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon M. (2001) Social empiricism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Spanier B. (1995) Im/partial science: Gender ideology in molecular biology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN

    Google Scholar 

  • Strevens M. (2003) The role of the priority rule in science. Journal of Philosophy 100: 55–79

    Google Scholar 

  • The Biology and Gender Study Group (1989). Importance of feminist critiques for contemporary cell biology. In N. Tusana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 172–187). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

  • Waring M. (1990) If women counted. Harper Collins, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994) Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts D. J. (2003) Six degrees: The science of a connected age. Norton, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Alen Sula.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morrow, D.R., Sula, C.A. Naturalized metaphilosophy. Synthese 182, 297–313 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9662-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9662-1

Keywords

Navigation