Abstract
Traditional representations of philosophy have tended to prize the role of reason in the discipline. These accounts focus exclusively on ideas and arguments as animating forces in the field. But anecdotal evidence and more rigorous sociological studies suggest there is more going on in philosophy. In this article, we present two hypotheses about social factors in the field: that social factors influence the development of philosophy, and that status and reputation—and thus social influence—will tend to be awarded to philosophers who offer rationally compelling arguments for their views. In order to test these hypotheses, we need a more comprehensive grasp on the field than traditional representations afford. In particular, we need more substantial data about various social connections between philosophers. This investigation belongs to a naturalized metaphilosophy, an empirical study of the discipline itself, and it offers prospects for a fuller and more reliable understanding of philosophy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen, C., Buckner, C., & Niepert, M. (2008). InPhO on the web. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from the Indiana Philosophy Ontology project’s Web site: http://inpho.cogs.indiana.edu.
Antony L.M. (1991) Quine as feminist: The radical import of naturalized epistemology. In: Antony L.M., Witt C. (eds) A mind of one’s own. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, pp 185–225
Barabási A.-L. (2002) Linked: The new science of networks. Perseus, Cambridge, MA
Blatti, S. (2008). Placement data. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from De Dicto: http://dedicto.blogspot.com/2008/05/recent-placement-data-of-top-30.html.
Bloor D. (1976/1991) Knowledge and social imagery. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Buchanan M. (2002) Nexus: Small worlds and the groundbreaking science of networks. Norton, New York, NY
Chalmers, D. (2008). Australasian philosophy family tree. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from David Chalmers’ Web site: http://consc.net/tree.html.
Cohen G. A. (2000) If you’re an egalitarian, how come you’re so rich. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Collins R. (1998) The sociology of philosophies: A global theory of intellectual change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Dever, J. (2008). The philosophy family tree. Retrieved May 31, 2008, from The University of Texas at Austin Web site: https://webspace.utexas.edu/deverj/personal/philtree/philtree.html.
Devitt M. (1991) Realism and truth. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Ditto P. H., Lopez D. F. (1992) Motivated skepticism: Use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 63(4): 568–584
Ditto P. H., Scepansky J. A., Munro G. D., Apanovitch A. M., Lockhart L. K. (1998) Motivated sensitivity to preference-inconsistent information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 75(1): 53–69
Festinger L. (1950) Informal social communication. Psychology Review 57(5): 271–282
Fischer P., Jonas E., Frey D., Schulz-Hardt S. (2005) Selective exposure to information: The impact of information limits. European Journal of Social Psychology 35: 469–492
Fung Y. (1948) A short history of Chinese philosophy: A systematic account of Chinese thought from its origins to the present day. The Free Press, New York, NY
Grafman J., Goel V. (2002) Neural basis of reasoning and thinking. Encyclopedia of cognitive science. Macmillan, London
Hays-Gilpin K., Whitley D. (eds) (1998) Reader in gender archaeology. Routledge, New York, NY
Hrdy S. (1981) The woman that never evolved. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA
Hull D. L. (1988) Science as a process: An evolutionary account of the social and conceptual development of science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL
Keller E. F. (1983) A felling for the organism. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco, CA
Keller E.F. (1985) The force of the pacemaker concept in theories of aggregation in cellular slime mold. In: Keller E.F. (eds) Reflections on gender and science. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, pp 150–157
Kitcher P. (1990) The division of cognitive labor. Journal of Philosophy 87: 5–22
Kitcher P. (1993) The advancement of science. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Kruglanski A. W., Pierro A., Mannetti L., De Grada E. (2006) Groups as epistemic providers: Need for closure and the unfolding of group-centrism. Pychological Review 113(1): 84–100
Kuhn T.S. (1977) Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In: Kuhn T.S. (eds) The essential tension: Selected studies in scientific tradition and change. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, pp 320–339
Latour B., Woolgar S. (1979/1986) Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Sage, Beverly Hills, CA
Lloyd E. (1993) Pre-theoretical assumptions in evolutionary explanations of female sexuality. Philosophical Studies 69: 139–153
Longino H., Doell R. (1983) Body, bias, and behavior: A comparative analysis of reasoning in two areas of biological science. Signs 9: 206–227
Morrow, D., & Sula, C. A. (2008). The phylosophy project (phylo). Retrieved May 31, 2008, from The Phylosophy Project’s Web site: http://www.phylosophy.net.
Nickerson R. S. (1998) Confirmation bias: A ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Review of General Psychology 2(2): 175–220
Putnam H. (1978) Meaning and the moral sciences. Routledge & Kegan Paul, London
Rosvall M., Bergstrom C.T. (2007) Maps of random walks on complex networks reveal community structure. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 105(4): 1118–1123. doi:10.1073/pnas.0706851105
Russell B. (1912/1997) Problems of philosophy. Oxford University Press, New York, NY
Sklar L. (1981) Do unborn hypotheses have rights. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 62: 17–29
Solomon M. (2001) Social empiricism. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
Spanier B. (1995) Im/partial science: Gender ideology in molecular biology. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN
Strevens M. (2003) The role of the priority rule in science. Journal of Philosophy 100: 55–79
The Biology and Gender Study Group (1989). Importance of feminist critiques for contemporary cell biology. In N. Tusana (Ed.), Feminism and science (pp. 172–187). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
Waring M. (1990) If women counted. Harper Collins, San Francisco, CA
Wasserman S., Faust K. (1994) Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
Watts D. J. (2003) Six degrees: The science of a connected age. Norton, New York, NY
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Morrow, D.R., Sula, C.A. Naturalized metaphilosophy. Synthese 182, 297–313 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9662-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-009-9662-1