Skip to main content
Log in

Relevance and verisimilitude

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

Popper's definition looked initially promising provided that the restriction of classical logic was removed. As we have seen, this promise is not fulfilled. The search for a satisfactory verisimilitude ordering must therefore be pursued along more mainstream lines. The present exercise ought, however, to make us aware of the possibility that breakdowns of proposed definitions might only occur because of strictly classical assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Bibliography

  1. Alan Ross Anderson and Nuel D. Belnap, Entailment, Princeton, 1975.

  2. Ross Brady, ‘The Non-Triviality of Dialectical Set Theory’, in [8].

  3. Imre Lakatos, ‘Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes’, in I. Lakatos and A. Musgrave (eds.), Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge U.P., 1970 (especially section 3C2).

  4. David lewis, Counterfactuals, Harvard U.P., 1973.

  5. Robert K. Meyer, The Consistency of Arithmetic, Australian National University, 1975; also ‘Relevant Arithmetic’, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 5, 1976, 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  6. David Miller, ‘Popper's Qualitative Theory of Verisimilitude’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 1974, 166–178.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chris Mortensen, ‘A Theorem on Verisimilitude’, Bulletin of the Section of Logic 7, 1978, 34–43.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Richard Routley, Robert K. Meyer, et al., Relevant Logics and Their Rivals, Australian National University, 1981 (forthcoming).

  9. Richard Routley, ‘The Choice of Logical Foundations: Non-classical Logics and the Ultralogical Choice’, Studia Logica 38, 1979, 76–96.

    Google Scholar 

  10. J. J. C. Smart, ‘Science as an Approximation to Truth’, Papers of the Australasian Association for History and Philosophy of Science Annual Conference 1976.

  11. Pavel Tichy, ‘On Popper's Definitions of Verisimilitude’, British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25, 1974, 155–160.

    Google Scholar 

  12. R. Hilpinen, ‘Approximate Truth and Truthlikeness’, in M. Przełecki et al. (eds), Formal Methods in the Methodology of the Empirical Sciences, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  13. I. Niiniluoto, ‘Truthlikeness in First Order Languages’, in J. Hintikka et al. (eds.) Essays on Mathematical and Philosophical Logic, D. Reidel, Dordrecht, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mortensen, C. Relevance and verisimilitude. Synthese 55, 353–364 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485829

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00485829

Keywords

Navigation