Skip to main content
Log in

What Makes Work Meaningful?

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prior scholarly approaches to meaningful work have largely fallen into two camps. One focuses on identifying how work can contribute to a meaningful life. The other studies the antecedents and outcomes of workers experiencing their work as meaningful. Neither of these approaches, however, captures what people look for when they seek meaningful work—or so I argue. In this paper, I give a new, commitment-based account of meaningful work by focusing on the reasons people have to choose meaningful work over other options. I draw on philosopher Ruth Chang’s account of voluntarist reasons (reasons that arise from an act of the will) to argue that commitments can create distinctive reasons to pursue certain work. It is the presence of these distinctive reasons that makes work meaningful.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

There are no data used in this theoretical article.

Notes

  1. Rosso et al. elsewhere distinguish between the terms ‘meaning’ and ‘meaningfulness,’ but here they are referring to both (2010: 95): “Following tradition, we also use the broad phrase ‘meaning of work’ to encompass both meaning and meaningfulness.” In other words, their point here is that the empirical literatures on both meaning and meaningfulness at work center on individuals’ perceptions of their work.

  2. A similar argument is made by William MacAskill (2014), who argues that if one wants to support certain charitable causes, it is in general better to pursue a lucrative career that will enable one to pay multiple other people to do the relevant charitable work than to become a charitable worker oneself. After all, if one only cares about the charitable goal, it should not matter who accomplishes it, and if one can make enough in a non-charitable role to pay the salaries of multiple charity workers, then one can do more to achieve the goal by donating a large proportion of one’s earnings to support those workers than by merely becoming one such worker.

  3. The notion of being on a par I borrow from Chang (2017), and I will discuss Chang’s account in detail in the next section.

  4. Note that this commitment need not be lifelong for it to make the disability activism position a more meaningful job to choose now than the mosquito net job.

  5. I am assuming that if it is objectively worthwhile for someone to participate in some work, then they have objective reasons to participate.

  6. That there is an objective reason to pursue certain work does not mean that there is always, on balance, greater reason to pursue that work. Even if an option has some value, there may be stronger reasons to avoid choosing it.

  7. Chang suggests that we can only generate voluntarist reasons when the relevant normative criteria do not allow fully determinate measurement of the difference in choice-worthiness between the options. However, Chang and others have argued that this is likely to obtain in many, if not most, of the decision-making scenarios we face (Parfit, 2016; Chang, 2013, p. 178; but c.f. Dorr, Nebel, & Zuehl, 2022).

  8. On the other hand, some philosophical discussions of flourishing emphasize the importance of pursuing one’s interests, suggesting that meaningful work may in at least some cases also contribute to a meaningful life (e.g., Feinberg, 1974).

References

  • Achor, S., Reece, A., Kellerman, G.R., Robichaux, A.: 9 out of 10 people are willing to earn less money to do more-meaningful work. Harvard Business Review (2018). https://hbr.org/2018/11/9-out-of-10-people-are-willing-to-earn-less-money-to-do-more-meaningful-work

  • Arthur, M. B., & Rousseau, D. M. (Eds.). (2001). The Boundaryless Career: A New Employment Principle for a New Organizational Era. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ​​Ashforth, B.E., Kreiner, G.E. (1999). “How can you do it?”: dirty work and the challenge of constructing a positive identity. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 413–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E. (1998). A Kantian theory of meaningful work. J. Business Ethics, 17(9–10), 1083–1092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowie, N. E. (2019). Dignity and Meaningful Work. In R. Yeoman, C. Bailey, A. Madden, & M. Thompson (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Meaningful Work (pp. 36–50). Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J.R., Fehige, Y.: Thought experiments. The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (2019). https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2019/entries/thought-experiment/

  • Bughin, J., Hazan, E., Lund, S., Dahlström, P., Wiesinger, A., & Subramaniam, A. (2018). Skill shift: Automation and the future of the workforce. McKinsey Glob. Inst., 1, 3–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunderson, J. S., & Thompson, J. A. (2009). The call of the wild: Zookeepers, callings, and the double-edged sword of deeply meaningful work. Admin. Sci. q., 54(1), 32–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calhoun, C. (2009). What good is commitment? Ethics, 119(4), 613–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Care, N. S. (1984). Career choice. Ethics, 94(2), 283–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R. (2013). Grounding practical normativity: going hybrid. Philosophical Studies, 164(1), 163–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R. (2017). Hard choices. J. Am. Philos. Assoc., 3(1), 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, R. (2020). Do we have normative powers? Aristotelian Soc. Suppl., 94(1), 275–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cinque, S., Nyberg, D., & Starkey, K. (2021). ‘Living at the border of poverty’: How theater actors maintain their calling through narrative identity work. Human Relations; Studies towards the Integration of the Social Sciences, 74(11), 1755–1780.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ciulla, J. B. (2000). The Working Life: The Promise and Betrayal of Modern Work. Three Rivers Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyter, A., Brown, M., & Burgess, J. (2018). Gig work and the fourth industrial revolution. J. Int. Affairs, 72(1), 37–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorr, C., Nebel, J. M., & Zuehl, J. (2022). The case for comparability. Noûs. https://doi.org/10.1111/nous.12407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, J. (1974). The Rights of Animals and Unborn Generations. In W. T. Blackstone (Ed.), Philosophy and Environmental Crisis (pp. 43–68). University of Georgia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankl, V. E. (2000). Man’s Search for Meaning: An Introduction to Logotherapy (4th ed.). Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geurts, B. (2018). Making sense of self talk. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 9(2), 271–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, D. T. (2004). The protean career: a quarter-century journey. J. Vocation. Behav., 65, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haque, U.: Wanting Meaningful Work Is Not a First World Problem. Harvard Business Review (2012). https://hbr.org/2012/10/is-meaning-a-first-world-probl

  • Hirschi, A. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution: issues and implications for career research and practice. Career Dev. q., 66(3), 192–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaros, S. J., Jermier, J. M., Koehler, J. W., & Sincich, T. (1993). Effects of continuance, affective, and moral commitment on the withdrawal process: an evaluation of eight structural equation models. Academy of Management Journal, 36(5), 951–995.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacAskill, W. (2014). Replaceability, career choice, and making a difference. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 17(2), 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J. P., & Herscovitch, L. (2001). Commitment in the workplace: toward a general model. Human Resource Management Review, 11(3), 299–326.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyers, D. (1987). Work and self-respect. In G. Ezorsky (Ed.), Moral Rights in the Workplace (pp. 18–27). State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michaelson, C. (2021). A normative meaning of meaningful work. J. Business Ethics, 170, 413–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1986). The View From Nowhere. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, O. (1989). Constructions of Reason: Explorations of Kant’s Practical Philosophy. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parfit, D. (2016). Can we avoid the repugnant conclusion? Theoria, 82(2), 110–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt, M. G., & Ashforth, B. E. (2003). Fostering meaningfulness in working and at work. In K. Cameron & J. Dutton (Eds.), Positive Organizational Scholarship: Foundations of a New Discipline (pp. 309–327). Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rodell, J. B. (2013). Finding meaning through volunteering: why do employees volunteer and what does it mean for their jobs? Academy of Management Journal, 56(5), 1274–1294.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roessler, B. (2012). Meaningful work: arguments from autonomy. Journal of Political Philosophy, 20(1), 71–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosso, B. D., Dekas, K. H., & Wrzesniewski, A. (2010). On the meaning of work: a theoretical integration and review. Res Org Behav, 30, 91–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon, T. M. (1975). Preference and urgency. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(19), 655–669.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schabram, K., & Maitlis, S. (2017). Negotiating the challenges of a calling: emotion and enacted sensemaking in animal shelter work. Academy of Management Journal, 60(2), 584–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwab, K. (2017). The Fourth Industrial Revolution. Crown Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, A. (1982). Meaningful work. Ethics, 92(4), 634–646.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, R. (1970). Good and Evil. Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veltman, A. (2016). Meaningful Work. Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wiggins, D. (1988). Truth, invention, and the meaning of life. In G. Sayre-McCord (Ed.), Essays on Moral Realism (pp. 127–165). Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf, S. (2010). Meaning in Life and Why It Matters. Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Yeoman, R. (2014). Conceptualising meaningful work as a fundamental human need. J. Business Ethics, 125(2), 235–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

There are many people to whom I owe my gratitude for helping me develop this paper. Special thanks go to Rob Hughes for his mentorship, encouragement, and critical comments at every stage of this paper’s development. I am also deeply grateful to Amy Sepinwall, Katherine Klein, Alan Strudler, Brian Berkey, Christopher Michaelson, three anonymous reviewers, and audiences at the Society for Business Ethics Annual Meeting, the Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management, and the British Academy of Management Annual Conference for their invaluable comments. Any errors remain my own.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Samuel A. Mortimer.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mortimer, S.A. What Makes Work Meaningful?. J Bus Ethics 185, 835–845 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05356-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05356-6

Keywords

Navigation