Skip to main content
Log in

Information privacy and performance appraisal: An examination of employee perceptions and reactions

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Role-failure acts (Waters and Bird, 1989) have been described as a form of morally questionable activity involving a failure to perform the managerial role. The present study examined employee perceptions and reactions with regard to one form of role-failure act, failure to maintain adequate privacy of performance appraisal information. The study assessed employees' attitudes toward various performance appraisal facets as an invasion of privacy and determined the relationships between these privacy-related attitudes and employees' satisfaction with components of their appraisal system, the system as a whole, and their jobs. Responses that organizations might take to counteract appraisal privacy concerns were also discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Burack, E. H.: 1988, Creative Human Resource Planning and Applications: A Strategic Approach (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cary, F. T.: 1976, ‘IBM's Guidelines to Employee Privacy’, Harvard Business Review (September–October).

  • Dorfman, P. W., W. G. Stephan, and J. Loveland: 1986, ‘Performance Appraisal Behaviors: Supervisor Perceptions and Subordinate Reactions’, Personnel Psychology 39, 579–97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, D. W.: 1977, Freedom Inside the Organization (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferris, G. R., G. S. Russ, and P. M. Fandt: 1989, ‘Politics in Organizations’, in R. A. Giacalone and P. Rosenfeld (ed.), Impression Management in the Organization (Hillsdale, NJ, Erlbaum).

    Google Scholar 

  • Giles, W. F. and K. W. Mossholder: 1990, ‘Employee Reactions to Contextual and Session Components of Performance Appraisal’, Journal of Applied Psychology 75, 371–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J.: 1986, ‘Determinants of Perceived Fairness of Performance Evaluations’, Journal of Applied Psychology 71, 340–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, L. and A. F. Westin: 1981, The Dimensions of Privacy: A National Opinion Research Survey of Attitudes Toward Privacy (Garland, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg, M. S.: 1975, What to do About Performance Appraisal (rev. ed.) (AMACOM, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lanza, P.: 1985, ‘Team Appraisals’, Personnel Journal 64(3), 46–51.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker, C. O., H. P. Sims, and D. A. Gioia: 1987, ‘Behind the Mask: The Politics of Employee Appraisal’, Academy of Management Executive 1, 183–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, F. C. and T. R. Bagby: 1987, ‘Possible Dangers in Tape Recording or Other Monitoring of Employees’, Employment Relations Today, 173–79.

  • Newman, M. and G. Marks de Chabris: 1987, ‘Employment and Privacy: A Problem for our Time’, Journal of Business Ethics 6, 153–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead, W. E., D. L. Worrell, and J. G. Stead: 1990, ‘An Integrative Model for Understanding and Managing Ethical Behavior in Business Organizations’, Journal of Business Ethics 9, 233–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, E. F., H. G. Gueutal, D. G. Gardner, and S. McClure: 1983, ‘A Field Experiment Comparing Information-Privacy Values, Beliefs, and Attitudes Across Several Types of Organizations’, Journal of Applied Psychology 68, 459–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toffler, B. L.: 1986, Tough Choices, (John Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Waters, J. A., F. Bird, and P. D. Chant: 1986, ‘Everyday Moral Issues Experienced by Managers’, Journal of Business Ethics 5, 373–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Water, J. A. and F. Bird: 1989, ‘Attending to Ethics in Management’, Journal of Business Ethics 8, 493–97.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Kevin W. Mossholder is Lowder Professor of Management at Auburn University, Auburn, AL. His research interests include performance appraisal, dispositional/situational issues, and organizational behavior processes. He has published articles in Journal of Applied Psychology, Academy of Management Journal, Academy of Management Review, and Journal of Management, among others.

William F. Giles, is Professor of Management at Auburn University. His research interests include performance appraisal, career development, ethical behavior, and employee benefits. His articles have appeared in Journal of Applied Psychology, Academy of Management Journal, and Personnel Psychology among others.

Mark A. Wesolowski is a doctoral candidate at Auburn University. He is currently an instructor of human resource management at Miami University of Ohio. His research interests include human resource selection issues, performance appraisal, management development, and supervisor/subordinate work relationships.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mossholder, K.W., Giles, W.F. & Wesolowski, M.A. Information privacy and performance appraisal: An examination of employee perceptions and reactions. J Bus Ethics 10, 151–156 (1991). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383618

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383618

Keywords

Navigation