References
Budden, A. E., Tregenza, T., Aarssen, L. W., Koricheva, J., Leimu, R., & Lortie, C. J. (2008). Double-blind review favours increased representation of female authors. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 23(1), 4–6.
Kmietowicz, Z. (2008). Double blind peer reviews are fairer and more objective, say academics. British Medical Journal, 336(7638), 241.
Moss-Racusin, C. A., Dovidio, J. F., Brescoll, V. L., Graham, M. J., & Handelsman, J. (2012). Science faculty’s subtle gender biases favor male students. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(41), 16474–16479.
Moustafa, K. (2014). The disaster of the impact factor. Science and Engineering Ethics. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9517-0.
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Moustafa, K. Blind Manuscript Submission to Reduce Rejection Bias?. Sci Eng Ethics 21, 535–539 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9547-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9547-7