Abstract
The main arguments of Milton Friedman's famous and influential essay are unsuccessful: He fails to prove that the exercise of social responsibility in business is by nature an unfair and socialist practice.
Much of Friedman's case is based on a questionable paradigm; a key premise is false; and logical cogency is sometimes missing.
The author proposes a different paradigm for socially responsible action in business and argues that a commitment to social responsibility can be an integral element in strategic and operational business management without producing any of the objectionable results claimed by Friedman.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Thomas Mulligan is an Assistant Professor at The Fuqua School of Business, Duke University, in the areas of Manufacturing Management Systems and Business Ethics. He has a Ph.D. from Northwestern University in the field of Philosophy and has worked as an educator, manager, and consultant in the manufacturing and software industries.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Mulligan, T. A critique of Milton Friedman's essay ‘the social responsibility of business is to increase its profits’. J Bus Ethics 5, 265–269 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383091
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00383091