Skip to main content
Log in

What Can Be Learned from DuPont and the Freon Ban: A Case Study

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Between 1974 and 1988, executives of DuPont, the world's largest producer of CFCs, were confronted with emerging evidence that CFCs were destroying the stratospheric ozone layer. The difficulty that executives face in such cases is that scientific knowledge develops over time and does not necessarily proceed in a straight line toward true conclusions. At the beginning of a new field of research, there is much uncertainty and disagreement among the experts. The solution of the ozone problem required a remarkable cooperation among science, business, and international governments. After looking at the role of DuPont executives in this drama, and the difficulties facing any executive dealing with uncertain science, the paper turns to an evaluation of the field of Business Ethics to see what light it might throw on this and analogous problems. Finally, the paper offers specific suggestions in terms of principles in dealing with uncertain science, and concludes that the course of action that DuPont followed, including some mistakes, can serve as a model for analogous crises.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Barkley, Michael B. (ed.): 2000, ‘The Cornwall Declaration on Environmental Stewardship’, in Environmental Stewardship in the Judeo-Christian Tradition(Acton Institute, Grand Rapids, Michigan).

  • Benedick, Richard Elliot: 1991, Ozone Diplomacy: New Directions in Saving the Planet(Harvard University Press, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Botzler, Richard and Susan Armstrong: 1998, Environmental Ethics: Divergence and Convergence, second edition (McGraw-Hill, Boston).

    Google Scholar 

  • Charen, Mona: 1999, ‘Media Bias Toward Environmentalist’, Wheeling Intelligencer.

  • Chisholm, Anne: 1972, Philosophers of the Earth(E. P. Dutton Co., New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Foreman, Dave: 1998, ‘Putting the Earth First’, in Botzler and Armstrong.

  • Goodpaster, Kenneth and Laura Nash: 1998, ‘DuPont Freon Division’, in Instructor's Manual to Accompany Policies and Persons: A Casebook in Business Ethics, third edition (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Gribben, John: February 1979, ‘Disappearing Threat to the Ozone’, New Scientist 81.

  • Jackall, Robert: 1998, Moral Mazes: The World of Corporate Managers(Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Litfin, Karen T.: 1994, Ozone Discourses: Science and Politics in Global Environmental Cooperation(Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, Sandra and Rogene Buchholz: 1999, Rethinking Business Ethics: A Pragmatic Approach(Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowlands, Ian H.: 1995, The Politics of Global Economic Change(Manchester University Press, Manchester and New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Andrew: 1999, ‘What's the Matter With business Ethics’, in Jennings Marianne Moody (ed.), Case Studies in Business Ethics(West Publishing Co., St. Paul Minnesota).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stolarski, R. S.: Jan 1988, ‘The Antarctic Ozone Hole’, Scientific American 258, 30-36.

Download references

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mullin, R.P. What Can Be Learned from DuPont and the Freon Ban: A Case Study. Journal of Business Ethics 40, 207–218 (2002). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020511815499

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1020511815499

Navigation