Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Beyond the Line: Violence and the Objectification of the Karitiana Indigenous People as Extreme Other in Forensic Genetics

  • Published:
International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue internationale de Sémiotique juridique Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Utilizing social semiotic approaches, this article addresses how genetic researchers’ organizing narratives have involved extensive ontological and epistemological violence in their objectification Karitiana Indigenous people of Western Brazil. The paper analyses how genetic researchers have represented the Karitiana in the US and Canadian courts, post-9/11 forensic identification technology development, and patents. It also considers disputes over the sale of Karitiana cell lines by the US National Institutes of Health-funded Coriell Cell Repositories. These case studies reveal how the prominent population geneticist Kenneth K. Kidd of Yale University and other genetics researchers have constituted the Karitiana as Extreme Other; liminal figures who define the boundaries of humanity. Originally sampled in 1987 by a Yale University epidemiologist, forensic genetic researchers have since utilized Karitiana cell lines to metonymically represent the Karitiana. The practices of objectification have imposed a genetically distinct special status upon the Karitiana that restricts recognition of their self-determination, rights and dignity, and which imposes onerous obligations to serve as research objects for the greater good of Humanity. The Karitiana are included as biological labour, but excluded from decision-making or asserting any other claims. Scientists have organized and maintained biotechnologically-mediated colonial relationships in which they and their institutions extract nearly all immediate and tangible benefits. The fusing of genetic research’s ontological and epistemological violence with the violence of state legal institutions raises important questions about the scope and practices of sovereignty, particularly in determining and enforcing states of exception through violence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. SNPs stands for single nucleotide polymorphisms. A nucleotide at any location on the genome will have one of the four molecules G, C, A, or T. Therefore, there is a maximum of four possible variants (alleles) at any single location, but two variants are most common. An SNP is defined as a variant that occurs in at least one-percent of the population.

  2. As successors to earlier formal empires, settler states like the USA and Brazil assert sovereignty over Indigenous peoples, expropriate their territories, marginalize them from political decision making processes, violate their sovereignty, deny their rights, and denigrate their legal claims.

  3. A crucial consideration in the military dictatorship’s development of the Amazon was that it was supposed to provide the wealth needed to help alleviate Brazil’s inequality without redistributing land or other measures that would affect elite privilege [68: pp. 145–146].

  4. Systemic colonial genocide involves a broader definition of genocide that common concepts that narrowly focus on the intentional targeted physical murder of a people or group. This broader conception of genocide includes the long-term overdetermined systemic destruction of the means to survive as a people. I consider this definition in keeping with Raphael Lemkin’s original broad conceptions of genocide [48].

  5. When needed some cell lines are thawed and grown in 37 °C bovine calf serum (made from cow fetuses and other nutrients).

  6. Typically the narrative schema has been conceived as having four phases. However, Fairhurst and Cooren have five phases because they divide the manipulation phase into two phases, the manipulation and the commitment [21].

  7. The assemblages are also affected by the necessity of that genetic researchers obtain the cooperation of involved state and institutional actants like funding sources and ethics review boards [54].

  8. Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium calculates the proportions of alleles across a population. For example, a simple case with two alleles (p + q)2 = 1 or p2 + 2pq + q2 = 1. Its assumptions are idealized, and include random mating, no migration, and an infinite population size.

  9. This accounting also extended to the hijackers’ remains. Many victims’ families were adamant that the remains of their loved ones not be mixed with those of the hijackers, and extensive efforts were made to identify and separate the hijackers’ remains from those of the victims [19]. The recovered hijackers’ remains are still in storage at Dover Air Force Base and with the New York City Medical Examiner [17]. None of the hijackers’ remains have been claimed by their families [17].

  10. The NIJ program has so far granted the Kenneth Kidd-led team at Yale University a total of US$2,856,408 in three grants: US$824,540 in 2004 and US$680,516 in 2007, and US$1,351,352 in 2010 [2, 56]. The 2004 and 2007 grants were both under the original 5-year effort and were both entitled “Population Genetics of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) for Forensic Purposes.” The 2010 grant is entitled “Further Development of SNP Panels for Forensics” [2, 56].

  11. Conversely, the US patent application screening process specifies that it can deny applications deemed potentially threatening to US sovereignty, such as weapons or those which reveal knowledge detrimental to US government interests [79].

  12. In this case, John Moore sued the University of California, after a UCLA doctor obtained a patent on cancer cells taken from Moore without Moore’s consent or knowledge.

  13. The Visigen Consortium webpage states that the Consortium is, “dedicated to uncover[ing] the genetic foundations of visible traits. Visible traits are properties of human beings that can readily be seen in social interaction, such as hair or eye color, stature, facial morphology, etc.” [80].

  14. For example, the Havasupai of Arizona and the Nuu-chah-nulth of Vancouver Island both recovered their communities’ samples after sustained organizing efforts against researchers who had committed severe ethics violations against them [36, 54: pp. 48–49; 76].

  15. The final concern is vindicated, since the cell lines have been grown in fetal calf serum.

  16. Dr. Vander Velden is a Brazilian anthropologist at the Universidade Federal de São Carlos who has done fieldwork with the Karitiana and discussed their sampling by Black and the CCR case with them.

  17. If we consider Pierre Bourdieu’s forms of capital (financial, social, cultural etc.), US government funding underwrites an array of capital formation and transformations that involve the Karitiana cell lines.

References

  1. Advancing justice through DNA technology: Executive summary. 2003. United States Department of Justice Website. From: http://www.justice.gov/ag/dnapolicybook_exsum.htm. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.

  2. Alternative genetic markers. n.d. DNA initiative. US Government website. Archived version: https://web.archive.org/web/20090812230143/http://dna.gov/research/alternative_markers/. Accessed 6 May 2009.

  3. Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Anderson, Benedict. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London, New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Arnold, Kathleen R. 2005. Asceticism in contemporary political theory: Marx, Weber, Nietzsche and beyond. Theory & Event, 8(2).

  6. Arnold, Kathleen R. 2007. Domestic War: Locke’s concept of prerogative and implications for U.S. wars today. Polity 39: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Aronson, Jay D. 2007. Genetic Witness: Science, law, and controversy in the making of DNA profiling. New Brunswick, New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Atwood, Roger. 1988, May 20. Virus in Amazon Indians may hold clues to AIDS origin. Reuters News. Factiva Database Document lba0000020011203dk5k01qo1.

  9. Baird, D.M., Alec John Jeffreys AJ, Nicola Jane Royle NJ. 1998. US Patent 6,235,468: Method for characterising variability in telomere DNA by PCR. http://www.google.com/patents/US6235468?cl=en. Accessed 3 May 2014.

  10. Biesecker, L.G., J.E. Bailey-Wilson, J. Ballantyne, H. Baum, F.R. Bieber, C. Brenner, B. Budowle, J.M. Butler, G. Carmody, P.M. Conneally, B. Duceman, A. Eisenberg, L. Forman, K.K. Kidd, B. Leclair, S. Niezgoda, T.J. Parsons, E. Pugh, R. Shaler, S.T. Sherry, A. Sozer, and A. Walsh. 2005. DNA identifications after the 9/11 World Trade Center Attack. Science 310: 1122–1123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Black, F.L., J.P. Woodall, A.S. Evans, H. Liebhaber, and G. Henle. 1970. Prevalence of antibody against viruses in the Tiriyo, an isolated Amazonian tribe. Journal of Epidemiology 91: 430–438.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Black, Francis. 1991. Reasons for failure of genetic classifications of South Amerind populations. Human Biology 63(6): 763–774.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Borofsky, R. 2005. Yanomami: The Fierce Controversy and what we can learn from it. Berkeley, CA, and London: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Budniakiewicz, Therese. 1992. Fundamentals of story logic: Introduction to Greimassian semiotics. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Budowle, B. 1992. DNA fingerprint matches: Response. Science 256(5065): 1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Burke, K. 1969. A rhetoric of motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bryan, Alix. 2013, May 10. 9/11 hijacker remains still in FBI and medical examiner’s custody. WTVR website (Richmond Virginia). http://wtvr.com/2013/05/10/911-hijacker-remains-still-in-fbi-and-medical-examiners-custody/.

  18. Chakraborty, Ranajit, and Kenneth K. Kidd. 1991. The utility of DNA typing in forensic work. Science 254: 1735–1739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Conant, Eve. 2009. Terror: The remains of 9/11 hijackers. Newsweek. http://www.newsweek.com/terror-remains-911-hijackers-78327. Accessed 9 Apr 2014.

  20. Cooren, F. 2000. The organizing property of communication. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooren, F., and G.T. Fairhurst. 2004. Speech timing and spacing: The phenomenon of organizational closure. Organization 11: 793–824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Coriell Cell Repositories. Catalog ID: GM10965. Coriell Cell Repositories website. http://ccr.coriell.org/Sections/Search/Sample_Detail.aspx?Ref=GM10965&PgId=166.

  23. Cover, Robert M. 1986. Violence and the word. Faculty Scholarship Series. Paper 2708. http://digitalcommons.law.yale.edu/fss_papers/2708.

  24. Coulthard, Glen. 2007. Subjects of empire: Indigenous peoples and the ‘politics of recognition’ in Canada. Contemporary Political Theory 6(4): 437–460.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Cultural Survival. 2004. Brazil: Indians’ genetic material sold on internet. Cultural Survival website. Accessed 22 Apr 2014 http://www.culturalsurvival.org/news/brazil-indians-genetic-material-sold-internet.

  26. Dean, Mitchell. 2007. Governing societies: Political perspectives on domestic and international rule. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Early, John D., and John F. Peters. 2000. The Xilixana Yanomami of the Amazon: History, social structure, and population dynamics. Gainesville, FL: University Press of Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Fairhurst, G., and F. Cooren. 2009. Leadership as the hybrid production of presence(s). Leadership 5(4): 469–490.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fanon, Frantz. 1967. Toward an African revolution: Political essays. Haakon Chevalier (Trans.). New York: Grove Press.

  30. Fanon, Frantz. 1986. Black skins, white masks. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Foundation Jean Dausset. u.d. HGDP-CEPH human genome diversity cell line panel. Foundation Jean Dausset-CEPH website. http://www.cephb.fr/en/hgdp/diversity.php/. Accessed 16 Apr 2014.

  32. Foundation Jean Dausset. 2010. Geographic origins. Foundation Jean Dausset-CEPH website. http://www.cephb.fr/data/HGDP-summary-pops-H1063-13plates.xls. Accessed 17 Sep 2014.

  33. Foucault, Michel. 2003. In Society must be defended: Lectures at the College De France, 197576. Ed. Mauro Bertani and Alessandro Fontana, trans. David Macey. New York: Picador.

  34. Fox-Keller, Evelyn. 1995. Refiguring life: Metaphors of twentieth-century biology. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  35. Harry, Deborah. 1995. The human genome diversity project: Implications for Indigenous peoples. Hartford Web Publishing. http://www.hartford-hwp.com/.

  36. Harry, Deborah. 2009. Indigenous peoples and gene disputes. Chicago-Kent Law Review 84: 147–189.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Her Majesty the Queen v. Allan Joseph Legere. Voir Dire, Vol XIII, pp. 1–177, May 27, 1991. University of New Brunswick Law School website http://www.unb.ca/fredericton/law/library/_resources/pdf/legal-materials/allan-legere/voir_dire/legerevoirdire_volxiii_may27_opt.pdf.

  38. Her Majesty the Queen v. Allan Joseph Legere. Vol. XVIII pages 4421 to 4673 incl. October 21 and 22, 1991. University of New Brunswick Law School website. http://www.unb.ca/fredericton/law/library/_resources/pdf/legal-materials/allan-legere/trial_transcripts/020.pdf.

  39. Humes, Edward. 1992, November 29. THE DNA WARS: Touted as an infallible method to identify criminals, DNA matching has mired courts in a vicious battle of expert witness. Los Angeles Times. http://articles.latimes.com/print/1992-11-29/magazine/tm-2666_1_dna-war. Accessed 17 Feb 2014.

  40. Jones, David S. 2003. Virgin soils revisited. The William and Mary Quarterly, Third Series 60(4): 703–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Keating B, Bansal AT, Walsh S, Millman J, Newman J, Kidd K, Budowle B, Eisenberg A, Donfack J, Gasparini P, Budimlija Z, Henders AK, Chandrupatla H, Duffy DL, Gordon SD, Hysi P, Liu F, Medland SE, Rubin L, Martin NG, Spector TD, and Kayser M on behalf of the International Visible Trait Genetics (VisiGen) Consortium. 2013. First all-in-one diagnostic tool for DNA intelligence: Genome wide inference of biogeographic ancestry, appearance, relatedness and sex with the Identitas v1 Forensic Chip. International Journal of Legal Medicine, 127(3):559–572.

  42. Kidd, J., F. Black, K. Weiss, I. Balazs, and K. Kidd. 1991. Studies of three Amerindian populations using nuclear DNA polymorphisms. Human Biology 63: 775–794.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Kidd JR, Pakstis AJ, Kidd KK. 1993. Global levels of DNA variation. In Proceedings of the 4th international symposium on human identification 1993 (Promega). Yale University School of Medicine website. http://medicine.yale.edu/labs/kidd/www/302.pdf. Accessed 2 Mar 2014.

  44. Kidd, Kenneth. 2011. Population genetics of SNPs for forensic purposes (Updated). National Criminal Justice Reference Service website (USA). https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/236433.pdf. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.

  45. 47 population samples routinely studied at Kidd Lab. n.d. Kidd Lab website. Yale University School of Medicine. http://medicine.yale.edu/labs/kidd/www/populationstudy.html. Accessed 21 Aug 2014.

  46. Landin, R. M. 1989. Kinship and naming among the Karitiana of northwestern Brazil. MA thesis, The University of Texas at Arlington. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses. http://search.proquest.com/docview/193891876. Accessed 10 Apr 2014.

  47. Latour, B. 1987. Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Lemkin, Raphael. 1944. Axis rule in occupied Europe: Laws of occupation, analysis of government, proposals for redress. Washington: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. From: http://www.preventgenocide.org/lemkin/AxisRule1944-1.htm. Accessed 17 Sep 2014.

  49. Lewontin, R.C., and Daniel L. Hartl. 1991. Science, New Series, Vol. 254, No. 5039: 1745–1750.

  50. Mbembe, A. 2003. Necropolitics. Public Culture 15(1): 11–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Miller, Robert J., and D’Angelis, Micheline. 2011. Brazil, Indigenous peoples, and the international law of discovery. Brooklyn Journal of International Law, 37(1):1–99. http://practicum.brooklaw.edu/sites/default/files/print/pdfs/journals/brooklyn-journal-international-law/volume-37/issue-1/bjil_v37i.pdf.

  52. Moore v. Regents of University of California, 793 P.2d 479 (Cal. 1990). Supreme Court of California. http://biotech.law.lsu.edu/cases/consent/Moore_v_Regents.htm. Accessed 14 Apr 2014.

  53. Munsterhjelm, Mark. 2013. The political economy of hope and authoritarian liberalism in genetics research. Borderlands e-journal 12(1). http://www.borderlands.net.au/vol12no1_2013/munsterhjelm_political.pdf.

  54. Munsterhjelm, Mark. 2014. Living dead in the Pacific: Contested sovereignty and racism in genetic research on Taiwan Aborigines. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  55. National Institute of Justice. 2006. 2006 National Institute of Justice DNA grantees meeting presenter biographies. United States National Institute of Justice website. http://www.nij.gov/topics/forensics/documents/events/dnagrantees/2006/2006_dna_bios.pdf.

  56. National Institute of Justice. 2012. Forensic DNA: Alternative genetic markers. United States National Institute of Justice website. http://nij.gov/topics/forensics/evidence/dna/research/pages/alternative-markers.aspx. Accessed 15 Sep 2014.

  57. Nussbaum, Martha. 1995. Objectification. Philosophy & Public Affairs 24(4): 249–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Oefner P.J., and P. A. Underhill. 1995. US 5795976 Patent: Detection of nucleic acid heteroduplex molecules by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography and methods for chromatography and methods for comparative sequencing. United States Patent and Trademark Office. http://www.google.com/patents/US5795976. Accessed 20 Apr 2014.

  59. Oefner, Peter. J. 2002. United States patent 6453244: Detection of polymorphisms by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. United States Patent and Trademark Office website. http://www.uspto.gov/.

  60. Olson, John Stuart. 1991. The Indians of Central and South America: An ethnohistorical dictionary. New York: Greenwood Press.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Ong, Aihwa. 2007. Neoliberalism as a mobile technology. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 32(1): 3–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Reardon, J., and K. TallBear. 2012. Your DNA is our history: Genomics, anthropology, and the construction of whiteness as property. Current Anthropology 53(S12): S233–S245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Risch, Neil, and B. Devlin. 1992. DNA fingerprint matches: Response. Science 256(5065): 1744–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Rohter, Larry. 2007. In the Amazon, giving blood but getting nothing. New York Times, June 20. http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/20/world/americas/20blood.html?pagewanted=all. Accessed 2 May 2014.

  65. Santos, Ricardo Ventura. 2002. Indigenous people, postcolonial context, and genomic research in the late 20th century: a view from Amazonia (1960–2000). Critique of Anthropology 22(1): 81–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Sassen, S. 2006. Territory, authority, rights: From medieval to global assemblages. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Schmitt, C. 1985. Political theology: Four chapters on the concept of sovereignty. Trans. From German and with an introduction by George Schwab. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  68. Skidmore, Thomas E. 1988. The politics of military rule in Brazil, 1964–85. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  69. Smith, Anthony D. 2000. The “sacred” dimension of nationalism. Millennium: Journal of International Studies 29(3): 791–814.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Smith, L.T. 1999. Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples. London: Zed Books.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Storto, Luciana and Felipe F. Vander Velden. 2005. Biopiracy and the unauthorized collection of biomedical samples. Indigenous Peoples in Brazil website. http://pib.socioambiental.org/en/povo/karitiana/389. Accessed 22 Apr 2014.

  72. Contact history. Indigenous Peoples in Brazil website. http://pib.socioambiental.org/en/povo/karitiana/386.

  73. Sullivan, P.J. 1992. DNA fingerprint matches. Science 256(5065): 1743–1746.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Teo, T. 2008. From speculation to epistemological violence in psychology: A critical hermeneutic reconstruction. Theory and Psychology 18(1): 47–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Thompson, William C. 1993. Evaluating the admissibility of new genetic identification tests: Lessons from the DNA War. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 84(1): 22–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Tsosie, Rebecca. 2011. Indigenous peoples and epistemic injustice: Science, Ethics, and Human Rights. Washington Law Review 87: 1133–1201.

    Google Scholar 

  77. Underhill, P.A., L. Jin, A.A. Lin, S.Q. Mehdi, T. Jenkins, D. Vollrath, R.W. Davis, L.L. Cavalli-Sforza, and P.J. Oefner. 1997. Detection of numerous Y chromosome biallelic polymorphisms by denaturing high-performance liquid chromatography. Genome Research 7: 996–1005. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press. http://genome.cshlp.org/content/7/10/996.full.pdf.

  78. Underhill, P., and Oefner, P. 2005. United States Patent 6929911: Method for determining genetic affiliation, substructure and gene flow within human populations. United States Patent and Trademark Office website.

  79. United States Patent and Trademark Office. 2014. Review of applications for national security and property rights issues. United States Patent and Trademark Office website. http://www.uspto.gov/web/offices/pac/mpep/s115.html. Accessed 26 Aug 2014.

  80. Visigen Consortium. u.d. https://sites.google.com/site/visigenconsortium/home. Accessed 18 Sep 2014.

  81. Walker, Polly O. 2004. Decolonizing conflict resolution: Addressing the ontological violence of Westernization. American Indian Quarterly 28(3 and 4): 527–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. Yale University. 2014. Kenneth K. Kidd Profile. Yale University School of Medicine website. http://medicine.yale.edu/genetics/people/kenneth_kidd-2.profile. Accessed 20 Apr 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Munsterhjelm.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Munsterhjelm, M. Beyond the Line: Violence and the Objectification of the Karitiana Indigenous People as Extreme Other in Forensic Genetics. Int J Semiot Law 28, 289–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-014-9395-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-014-9395-4

Keywords

Navigation