Abstract
Our question is whether technicality can institute, and thus create a new power, or even legitimize and maintain institutions. It claims to do so, all haloed by sacredness or religiosity with the development of computers, networks and the Internet. But this would presuppose that technology could symbolize, i.e. embody an instance of Truth, an irrational core of beliefs or myths that would answer the question of 'why' we live in society. It claims to do so as an ‘applied science’ or technoscience, science having become the authority of truth in Western societies. But technicity cannot symbolize and remains locked in the "how", in the order of rational action, utility and efficiency.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
All quotes without references to official translations were translated by Pierre Musso and Lila Roussel.
Anthony Levandowski with Mark Harris, Inside the First Church of Artificial Intelligence. Wired, 15 November 2017. https://www.wired.com/story/anthony-levandowski-artificial-intelligence-religion/. Accessed 18 November 2021.
References
Balandier, G. 2001. Le Grand Système. Paris: Fayard.
Balandier, G. 1986. Un regard sur la société de communication. In Actes du colloque du CNCA Nouveaux programmes et communication audiovisuelle, eds. Éric Duckaerts, Pierre Musso et Jean-Marc Vernier, 161. Paris: Centre Georges Pompidou.
Burdeau, G. 1970. L’État. Paris: Éd. du Seuil, coll. « Points ».
Castoriadis, Cornelius. 1975. L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Éd. du Seuil.
Ellul, Jacques. 2012. Le système technicien. Paris: Éd. du Cherche-Midi. (Original work published in 1977).
Ferguson, Charles H. 2005. What’s next for Google? Technology Review 108 (1): 38–46.
Heidegger, Martin. 1958. La question de la technique. In Essais et Conférences. Paris: Gallimard.
Heidegger, Martin. 1976. Nur ein Gott kann uns noch retten. (Interview held in 1966). Der Spiegel 23: 193.
Hottois, Gilbert. 1984. Le Signe et la technique. Paris: Aubier.
Kissinger, Henry A. 2018. How the Enlightenment Ends. The Atlantic. https ://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2018/06/henry-kissinger-ai-could-mean-the-end-of-human-history/559124/. Accessed May 5, 2021
Lardellier, Pascal. 2013. Un anthropologue à l’Apple Store: notes de terrain sur le millénarisme d’Apple. Questions De Communication 23 (23): 121–144.
Lebrun, Jean-Pierre. 2009. Le monde et ses limites. Toulouse: Erès.
Legendre, Pierre. 1998. La 901ème conclusion. Étude sur le théâtre de la Raison. Paris : Fayard.
Leroi-Gourhan André (1964). Le geste et la parole, Technique et Langage, Vol. 1. Paris, Albin Michel. [Gesture and speech ; translated from the French by Anna Bostock Berger ; and introduced by Randall White) Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, c1993].
Lessig, Lawrence. 2000. Code is Law: On Liberty in Cyberspace, Harvard Magazine. https://www.harvardmagazine.com/2000/01/code-is-law-html. Accessed May 10, 2021.
Lévi-Strauss, Claude. 1974. Anthropologie structurale, Paris, Plon (1958). [Structural anthropology ; translated from the French by Claire Jacobson and Brooke Grundfest Schoepf. New York : Basic Books c1963].
Lexcellent, Christian. 2019. Artificial Intelligence versus Human Intelligence. Are Humans Going to be Hacked? Basel: Springer International Publishing.
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1979. La condition post-moderne. Paris: Éd. de Minuit.
Marcuse, Herbert. 1968. L’Homme unidimensionnel. Paris: Ed. de Minuit [One-dimensional man; studies in the ideology of advanced industrial society. Boston: Beacon Press, c1964].
Mauss, Marcel. 1973. Techniques of the Body. Economy and Society 2 (1): 70–88.
Mauss, Marcel. 1978. Les techniques du corps. In Sociologie et Anthropologie. Paris: P.U.F. (Original publication in 1934).
Roco, Michail C. and Bainbridge William Sims (eds.). 2002. Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nanotechnology, biotechnology, information technology and cognitive science. Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation (NSF).
Rossi, Paolo. 1999. Aux origines de la science moderne. Paris: Éd. du Seuil, coll. « Sciences ».
Sfez, Lucien. 1995. La Santé Parfaite. Critique d’une nouvelle utopie. Paris: Éd. du Seuil.
Sfez, Lucien. 2002. Technique et idéologie. Un enjeu de pouvoir. Paris: Éd. du Seuil.
Simondon, Gilbert. 1958. Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier.
Simondon, Gilbert. 2014. Sur la Technique. Paris: P.U.F.
Testard, Alain. 2021. Essai d’épistémologie pour les sciences sociales. Paris: Biblis, CNRS éditions.
Tosel, André. 2014. Essai pour une culture du futur. Bellecombe-en-Bauges: Éditions du Croquant.
Turner, Fred. 2012. Aux sources de l’utopie numérique, De la contre-culture à la cyberculture: Steward Brand, un homme d’influence. Caen: C&F editions. [2008. From Counterculture to Cyberculture: Stewart Brand, the Whole Earth Network, and the Rise of Digital Utopianism. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press].
Wiener, Norbert. 1964. God and Golem, inc.; a comment on certain points where cybernetics impinges on religion. Cambridge: M.I.T. Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Musso, P. Technicity and the Power of Institution. Law Critique 33, 131–139 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-021-09318-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-021-09318-7