Abstract
This article contributes to the body of stakeholder literature by providing an in-depth analysis of the dynamics of stakeholder relationships as a part of change in value creation. The article presents an argument that the stakeholder salience model as a tool for analyzing stakeholder relationships is not sufficient for understanding business value creation. In the recent stakeholder literature, understanding business value creation has become an important theme. Through an analysis of an empirical case, the article shows how the three stakeholder relationship attributes, legitimacy, power and urgency help to reveal the definitive stakeholders and to capture dynamics of stakeholder relations. However, in the case of strategic change, where the value creation of a firm is in transition, a more profound understanding of stakeholder relationships is needed. As a result of our empirical analysis, six characteristics of stakeholder relationships were identified. To conclude, the question of who and what really counts should be replaced by the question of how value is created in stakeholder relationships.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aaltonen, K., Kujala, J., & Oijala, T. (2008). Stakeholder salience in global projects. International Journal of Project Management, 26(5), 509–516.
Barringer, B. R., & Harrison, J. S. (2000). Walking a tightrope: Creating value through interorganizational relationships. Journal of Management and Governance, 9, 5–32.
Boesso, G., & Kumar, K. (2009). Stakeholder prioritization and reporting: Evidence from Italy and the US. Accounting Forum, 33(2), 162–175.
Calton, J. M., & Payne, S. L. (2003). Coping with paradox. Business and Society, 42, 7–42.
Co, H. C., & Barro, F. (2009). Stakeholder theory and dynamics in supply chain collaboration. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 29(6), 591–611.
de Vries, J. (2009). Assessing inventory projects from a stakeholder perspective: Results of an empirical study. International Journal of Production Economics, 118(1), 136–145.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Introduction: The discipline and practice of qualitative research. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 1–28). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Dyer, J. F., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: Cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.
Eesley, C., & Lenox, M. J. (2006). Firm responses to secondary stakeholder action. Strategic Management Journal, 27(8), 765–781.
Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pittman.
Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J., & Wicks, A. (2007). Managing for stakeholders. Survival, reputation, and success. London: Yale University Press.
Freeman, R. E., & Liedtka, J. (1997). Stakeholder capitalism and the value chain. European Management Journal, 15(3), 286–296.
Freeman, R. E., Wicks, A. C., & Parmar, B. (2004). Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organization Science, 15(3), 364–369.
Friedman, A. L., & Miles, S. (2002). Developing stakeholder theory. Journal of Management Studies, 39, 1–21.
Frooman, J. (1999). Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review, 24(2), 191–205.
Goyder, M. (1999). Value and values: Lessons for tomorrow’s company. Long Range Planning, 32(2), 217–224.
Harvey, B., & Schaefer, A. (2001). Managing relationships with environmental stakeholders: A study of U. K. water and electricity utilities. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(3), 243–260.
Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: What’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 125–139.
Jawahar, I. M., & Mclaughlin, G. L. (2001). Toward a descriptive stakeholder theory: An organizational life-cycle approach. Academy of Management Review, 26(3), 397–414.
Kyngäs, H., & Vanhanen, L. (1999). Sisällön analyysi. Hoitotiede, 11, 3–12.
Magness, V. (2008). Who are the stakeholders now? An empirical examination of the Mitchell, Agle, and Wood theory of stakeholder salience. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(2), 177–192.
Mintzberg, H., & Waters, J. (1982). Tracking strategy in an entrepreneurial company. Academy of Management Journal, 25(3), 465–499.
Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853–886.
Näsi, J. (1995). What is stakeholder thinking? In J. Näsi (Ed.), Understanding stakeholder thinking (pp. 19–32). Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
Neill, J. D., & Stovall, O. S. (2005). Stakeholder salience and corporate social responsibility: Evidence from three companies. Journal of Applied Business Research, 21(3), 71–78.
Neville, B., & Menguc, B. (2006). Stakeholder multiplicity: Toward an understanding of the interactions between stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 66(4), 377–391.
Pajunen, K. (2006). Living in agreement with a contract: The management of moral and viable firm-stakeholder relationships. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(3), 243–258.
Parent, M., & Deephouse, D. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(1), 1–23.
Post, J. E., Preston, L. E., & Sachs, S. (2002). Managing the extended enterprise: The new stakeholder view. California Management Review, 45, 6–28.
Ramírez, R. (1999). Value co-production: Intellectual origins and implications for practise and research. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 49–65.
Rowley, T. J. (1997). Moving beyond dyadic ties: A network theory of stakeholder influences. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 887–910.
Rowley, T. J., & Moldoveanu, M. (2003). When will stakeholder groups act? An interest- and identity-based model of stakeholder group mobilization. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 204–219.
Svendsen, A., Boutlier, R., Abbott, R., & Wheeler, D. (2002). Measuring the business value of stakeholder relationships. Vancouver: The Centre for Innovation in Management, Simon Fraser University.
Tuomi, J., & Sarajärvi, A. (2006). Laadullinen tutkimus ja sisällönanalyysi. Jyväskylä: Gummerus.
Wheeler, D., & Davies, R. (2004). Gaining goodwill: Developing stakeholder approaches to corporate governance. Journal of General Management, 30, 51–74.
Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research. Design and methods (Revised ed.). London: Sage.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
An illustration of the inductive qualitative content analysis
Two photos from the analysis phase of the research
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Myllykangas, P., Kujala, J. & Lehtimäki, H. Analyzing the Essence of Stakeholder Relationships: What do we Need in Addition to Power, Legitimacy, and Urgency?. J Bus Ethics 96 (Suppl 1), 65–72 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0945-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0945-3