Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-25wd4 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-25T10:50:50.285Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Li (禮), or Ritual Propriety: A Preface to a Confucian Philosophy of Human Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2024

Kyung-Hee Nam*
Affiliation:
Ewha Womans University, South Korea
*
Kyung-Hee Nam, Ewha Womans University, 52 Ewhayeodae-gil, Seodaemoon-goo, Seoul 120-750, South Korea. Email: namkh@ewha.ac.kr

Abstract

In this paper, I propose an interpretation of the Confucian concept of li or Ritual Propriety, and suggest a new philosophy of action and mind on the basis of the concept. To achieve this aim, I focus upon and analyze passages in The Analects, and try to establish major Confucian theses on human action. By comparing Confucian views on human action with Western ones, I shed light on the originality of the concept of li.

Major theses on li in The Analects are as follows: (1) As an essential characteristic of human behavior, li is ordinary and ubiquitous. (2) Li is a socialized form of our mind, is the outside of an inside, and as such presupposes the unity of the mind and body. (3) Li is a social medium through which we interact with others in order to achieve common values and to turn our society into a harmonious and aesthetic space. To argue for the above theses, I focus on the centrality of language in our life, and utilize Russian psychologist Vygotsky's theory of language learning as well as Wittgenstein's concept of language game, together with the Confucian theory of correct names.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © ICPHS 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ames, RT, Rosemont, R, eds (1998) Confucius’ Analects: A Philosophical Translation. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Renhou, Cai (1994) 孔孟荀哲學, trans. into Korean by Cheon, B-D. Seoul: Yemoonseowon.Google Scholar
Fingarette, H (1972) Confucius: The Secular as Sacred. New York: Harper and Low.Google Scholar
Geertz, C (1973) The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hansen, C (1992) A Daoist Theory of Chinese Thought: A Philosophical Interpretation. Oxford: OUP.Google Scholar
Knoblock, J, ed. (19881994) Xunzi: A Translation and Study of the Complete Works. Stanford, CA: Stanford UP.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Owen, S (1992) Readings in Chinese Literary Thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard UP.Google Scholar
PKU Library, ed. (1992) 論語索引. Beijing: Beijing UP.Google Scholar
Saussure, F (1966) Course in General Linguistics, trans. by Baskin, W. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, LS (1963) Thought and Language, ed. by Cole, M, et al. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Vygotsky, LS (1978) Mind in Society, trans. by Kozulin, A. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L (1922) Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L (1953) Philosophical Investigations, trans. by Anscombe, E. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar