Abstract
Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality is G.A. Cohen‘s attempt to rescue something of the socialist outlook on society from the challenge of libertarianism, which Cohen identifies with the work of Robert Nozick in his famous book, Anarchy, State, and Utopia. Sympathizing with the leading idea that a person must belong to himself, and thus be unavailable for forced redistribution of his efforts, Cohen is at pains to reconcile the two. This cannot be done – they are flatly contrary. Moreover, equality is a nonsense principle, calling for such things as ’’equal distribution of natural resources.‘‘ But resources, as goods, are not “natural”: all require work to utilize. The only thing exchanged on markets is services, and estimates of value received are relevantly made only by those party to the exchanges in question. Imposition from above on voluntary exchange can only be socially counterproductive.
Similar content being viewed by others
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Narveson, J. Libertarianism vs. Marxism: Reflections on G. A. Cohen‘s Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality. The Journal of Ethics 2, 1–26 (1998). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009749215043
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009749215043