Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-sxzjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T13:58:41.164Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Extending the Gaze: The Temporality of Astronomical Paperwork

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2013

Omar W. Nasim
Omar W. Nasim*
Affiliation:
Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (ETH-Zurich) E-mail: omar.nasim@wiss.gess.ethz.ch
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Argument

Keeping records has always been an essential part of science. Aside from natural history and the laboratory sciences, no other observational science reflects this activity of record-keeping better than astronomy. Central to this activity, historically speaking, are tools so mundane and common that they are easily overlooked; namely, the notebook and the pencil. One obvious function of these tools is clearly a mnemonic one. However, there are other relevant functions of paperwork that often go unnoticed. Among these, I argue, is the strategic use made of different procedures of record keeping to prolong observational time with a target object. Highlighting this function will help us to appreciate the supporting role played by the notebook and the pencil to extend the observational time spent with a target object. With objects as delicate, faint, and mysterious as the nebulae, the procedures used to record their observations helped nineteenth-century observers overcome the temporal handicaps and limitations of large and clumsy telescopes, mounted in the altazimuth manner. To demonstrate the importance of paper and pencil, I will closely examine the observing books, the drawings found therein, and the telescopes of three nineteenth-century observers of the nebulae: Sir John F. W. Herschel, Lord Rosse, and William Lassell.

Type
Research Article
Information
Science in Context , Volume 26 , Special Issue 2: Knowledge in the Making , June 2013 , pp. 247 - 277
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Airy, George. 1849. “Substance of the Lecture delivered by the Astronomer Royal on the large Reflecting Telescopes of the Earl of Rosse and Mr. Lassell . . .” Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 9:110–121.Google Scholar
Anonymous. 1850. “The Leviathan Telescope and its Revelations.” Fraser's Magazine December: 591–601.Google Scholar
Becker, Barbara J. 2011. Unravelling Starlight: William and Margaret Huggins and the Rise of the New Astronomy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, J. A. 1976. “‘On the Power of Penetrating into Space’: The Telescopes of William Herschel.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 7:75–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brush, Stephan G. 1996. Nebulous Earth: The Origin of the Solar System and the Core of the Earth from Laplace to Jeffreys. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chapman, Alan. 1988. “William Lassell (1799–1880): Practitioner, Patron and ‘Grand Amateur’ of Victorian Astronomy.” Vistas in Astronomy 32:341–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Alan. 1993. “An Occupation for an Independent Gentleman: Astronomy in the life of John Herschel.” Vistas in Astronomy 36:71–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapman, Alan. 1998. The Victorian Amateur Astronomer: Independent Astronomical Research in Britain 1820–1920. Chichester: Praxis Publishing.Google Scholar
Crowe, Michael. 1999. The Extraterrestrial Life Debate 1750–1900. New York: Dover Publications.Google Scholar
Dewhirst, David. 1983. “Early Drawings of Messier 1: Pineapple or Crab?” Observatory 103:114–116.Google Scholar
Edgerton, Samuel, and Lynch, Michael. 1988. “Aesthetics and Digital Image Processing: Representational Craft in Contemporary Astronomy.” In Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations, edited by Fyfe, Gordon and Law, John, 184–220. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gingerich, Owen. 1985. “The Discovery of the Spiral Arms of the Milky Way.” In The Milky Way Galaxy; Proceedings of the 106th Symposium, Groningen, Netherlands, edited by Van Woerden, Hugo, Allen, Ronald J., and Burton, William Butler, 59–70. Dordrecht: D. Reidel Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Griesemer, James, and Yamashita, Grant. 2005. “Zeitmanagement bei Modellsystemen Drei Beispiele aus der Evolutionsbiologie.” In Lebendige Zeit. Wissenskulturen im Werden, edited by Schmidgen, Henning, 213–241. Berlin: Kadmos.Google Scholar
Harrison, Thomas G. 1984. “The Orion Nebula: Where in History Is It?” Quarterly Journal for the Royal Astronomical Society 24:65–79.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Klaus, and Wittmann, Axel D. eds. 2000. The Role of Visual Representations in Astronomy: History and Research Practice. Thun and Frankfurt am Main: Verlag Harri Deutsch.Google Scholar
Hentschel, Klaus. 2002. Mapping the Spectrum: Techniques of Visual Representation in Research and Teaching. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herschel, John. 1826. “An Account of the Actual State of the Great Nebula in Orion Compared with Those of Former Astronomers.” Memoirs of the Astronomical Society of London 2:487–95.Google Scholar
Herschel, John. 1833. “Observations of Nebulae and Clusters of Stars, Made at Slough, with a Twenty-Feet Reflector, between the Years 1825 and 1833.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 123:359–505.Google Scholar
Herschel, John. 1847. Results of Astronomical Observations Made During the Years 1834, 5, 6, 7, 8, At the Cape of Good Hope: Being the Completion of a Telescopic Survey of the Whole Surface of the Visible Heavens, Commenced in 1825. London: Smith, Elder.Google Scholar
Herschel, John. [1849] 1857. “An Address Delivered at the Anniversary Meeting of the Astronomical Society, Feb. 9. 1849.” In Essays from the Edinburgh and Quarterly reviews with addresses and other pieces. London: Longman, Brown, Green, Longmans, & Roberts.Google Scholar
Hoskin, Michael. 2011a. “William Herschel and the Nebulae, Part 1: 1774–1784.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 42:177–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoskin, Michael. 2011b. “William Herschel and the Nebulae, Part 2: 1785–1818.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 42:321–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, Elizabeth. 2007. “Resolving the Nebulae: the Science and Art of Representing M51.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38:477–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King-Hele, D.G. ed. 1992. John Herschel 1792–1871: A Bicentennial Commemoration. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
Lassell, William. 1854a. “Observations of the Nebula of Orion, made at Valletta, with the Twenty-Foot Equatoreal.” Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society 23:53–57.Google Scholar
Lassell, William. 1854b. “Miscellaneous Observations, chiefly of Clusters and Nebulae.” Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society 23:59–62.Google Scholar
Lassell, William. 1867a. “Observations of Planets and Nebulae at Malta.” Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society 36:1–32.Google Scholar
Lassell, William. 1867b. “Miscellaneous Observations with the Four-foot Equatoreal at Malta.” Memoirs of the Royal Astronomical Society 36:33–44.Google Scholar
Nasim, Omar W. 2008. “Beobachtungen mit der Hand: Astronomische Nebelskizzen im 19. Jahrhundert.” In Daten sichern: Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren der Aufzeichnung, edited by Hoffmann, Christoph, 21–46. Zurich and Berlin: Diaphanes Verlag.Google Scholar
Nasim, Omar W. 2009. On Seeing an Image of a Spiral Nebula: From Whewell to Flammarion.” Nuncius: Journal of the History of Science 24:393–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasim, Omar W. 2010a. “Observation, Working Images, and Procedure: the ‘Great Spiral’ in Lord Rosse's Astronomical Record Books and Beyond.” British Journal for the History of Science 43:353–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasim, Omar W. 2010b. “Zeichnen als mittel der »Familiarization« zur Erkundung der Nebel im Lord Rosse-Projekt”. In Notieren, Skizzieren: Schreiben und Zeichnen als Verfahren des Entwurfs, edited by Nasim, Omar W. and Krauthausen, Karin, 159–188. Zurich & Berlin: Diaphanes Verlag.Google Scholar
Nasim, Omar W. 2011. “The ‘Landmark’ and ‘Groundwork’ of Stars: John Herschel, Photography and the Drawing of Nebulae.” Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science 42 (1):67–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasim, Omar. In press. Observing by Hand: Sketching the Nebulae in the 19th Century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oxmantown, Lord [the fourth Earl of Rosse]. 1868. “An Account of the Observations on the Great Nebula in Orion, Made at Birr Castle, with the 3-Feet and 6-Feet Telescopes, between 1848 and 1867, with a Drawing of the Nebula.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 158:57–73.Google Scholar
Rosse, Earl of. 1850. “Observations on the Nebulae.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 140:449–514.Google Scholar
Rosse, Earl of. 1861. “On the construction of specula of six-feet aperture; and a selection from the observations of nebulae made with them.” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 151:681–745.Google Scholar
Ruskin, Steven. 2004. John Herschel's Cape voyage: Private science, public imagination and the ambitions of Empire. Surrey: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Sanjek, Roger. 1990. “A Vocabulary for Fieldnotes.” In Fieldnotes: The Making of Anthropology, edited by Sanjek, Roger, 92–121. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1980. “Herschel in Bedlam: Natural History and Stellar Astronomy.” British Journal for the History of Science, 13:211–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1989. “The Nebular Hypothesis and the Science of Progress.” In History, Humanity and Evolution, edited by Moore, James R., 131–64. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1998a. “On Astronomical Drawing.” In Picturing Science, Producing Art, edited by Jones, Caroline A. and Galison, Peter, 441–474. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Simon. 1998b. “The Leviathan of Parsonstown: Literary Technology and Scientific Representation.” In Inscribing Science: Scientific Texts and Materiality of Communication, edited by Lenoir, Timothy, 182–222. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Robert. 2008. “Beyond the Galaxy: the Development of Extragalactic Astronomy 1885–1965, Part 1.” Journal for the History of Astronomy 39:91–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snyder, Laura J. 2007. “‘Lord only of the ruffians and fiends’? William Whewell and the plurality of worlds debate.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 38:584–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinicke, Wolfgang. 2010. Observing and Cataloguing Nebulae and Star Clusters: From Herschel to Dreyer's New General Catalogue. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steinicke, Wolfgang. 2012. “The M51 Mystery: Lord Rosse, Robinson, South and the Discovery of Spiral Structure in 1845.” Journal of Astronomical History and Heritage 15:19–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Brian. 1979. “Sir John Herschel's Description of His 20-Feet Reflector.” Vistas in Astronomy 23:75–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Brian, ed. 1992a. The John Herschel Bicentennial Symposium. Cape Town: Royal Society of South Africa.Google Scholar
Warner, Brian. 1992b. “Sir John Herschel at the Cape of Good Hope.” The John Herschel Bicentennial Symposium, edited by Warner, Brian, 19–55. Cape Town: Royal Society of South Africa.Google Scholar
Warner, Brian. 1992c. “The Years at the Cape of Good Hope.” John Herschel 1792–1871: A Bicentennial Commemoration, edited by King-Hele, D.G., 51–65. London: Royal Society.Google Scholar
Weekes, Trevor. 2010. “The Nineteenth-Century Spiral Nebula Whodunit.” Physics in Perspective 12:146–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar