Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Ethical, Virtuous, and Charismatic Leadership: An Examination of Differential Relationships with Follower and Leader Outcomes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several alternative leadership approaches have been introduced to supplement the long-standing transformational leadership (TL) model (Bass in Leadership and performance beyond expectations, New York, Free Press, 1985; Bass and Avolio in Multifactor leadership questionnaire, 2000) as concerns have grown that it did not place enough emphasis on leader ethics. Nonetheless, to establish the value of the newer approaches, evidence of conceptual and empirical distinctiveness is required. Though meta-analysis has been somewhat helpful in this regard (e.g., Bedi et al. in J Bus Ethics 139(3):517–536, 2016), we conducted two within-study comparisons of ethical leadership (Brown et al. in Org Behav Human Decis Process 97:117–134, 2005), virtuous leadership (Wang and Hackett in J Bus Ethics 137:321–345, 2016) and key components of TL (idealized influence and inspirational motivation; Bass and Avolio 2000) reflected by socialized charismatic leadership. We predicted that these alternative models differ in the strength of their ties to a range of valued outcomes. Our analyses of 230 leader–follower dyads based predominately in North America (Sample 1) and US-based 131 dyads (Sample 2) left many hypotheses unsupported; nonetheless, there was evidence of differential associations. For example, across both samples, in the context of all three models, follower-rated ethical leadership (Brown et al. 2005) was the only significant predictor of follower-rated leader effectiveness, leader-rated subordinate in-role performance, and leader-rated follower ethicality. As hypothesized, virtuous leadership (Wang and Hackett 2016) was the strongest predictor of self-rated leader happiness in Sample 1, but contrary to expectations, in Sample 2, only the TL components (Bass and Avolio 2000) were related to happiness and life satisfaction among both leaders and followers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arnold, K. A., Turner, N. A., Barling, J., Kelloway, E. K., & McKee, M. (2007). Transformational leadership and well-being: The mediating role of meaningful work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashkanasy, N. M., & Tse, B. (2000). Transformational leadership as management of emotion: A conceptual review. In N. M. Ashkanasy & C. E. Härtel (Eds.), Emotions in the workplace: Research, theory and practice (pp. 221–235). Westport: Quorum Books/Greenwood Publishing Group Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Avey, J., Wernsing, T., & Palanski, M. (2012). Exploring the process of ethical leadership: The mediating role of employee voice and psychological ownership. Journal of Business Ethics, 107, 21–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., Bass, B. M., & Jung, D. I. (1999). Re-examining the components of transformational and transactional leadership using the multifactor leadership questionnaire. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 72, 441–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avolio, B. J., & Luthans, F. (2006). High impact leader: Moments matter in authentic leadership development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1976). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Banks, G. C., Gooty, J., Ross, R., Wiliams, C., & Harrison, N. (2018). Construct redundancy in leader behaviors: A review and agenda for the future. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 236–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M. (1985). Leadership and performance beyond expectations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2000). Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire. Retrieved on April 19, 2018, from: https://www.mindgarden.com.

  • Bass, B. M., & Riggio, R. E. (2006). Transformational leadership. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bearden, W. O., & Netemeyer, R. G. (1999). Handbook of marketing scales: Multi-item measures for marketing and consumer behavior research (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bedi, A., Alpaslan, C. M., & Green, S. (2016). A meta-analytic review of ethical leadership outcomes and moderators. Journal of Business Ethics., 139(3), 517–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10551-01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bensigner, G., & Farrell, M. (2017). Uber's backers force out leader. The Wall Street Journal, June 22, 2017, A1.

  • Boston, W. (2020). Mitsubishi motors faces emissions probe in Germany. The Wall Street Journal, January 22, 2020, B3.

  • Braun, S., Peus, C., Weisweiler, S., & Frey, D. (2013). Transformational leadership, job satisfaction, and team performance: A multilevel mediation model of trust. The Leadership Quarterly, 24, 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brebner, J., Donaldson, J., Kirby, N., & Ward, L. (1995). Relationships between happiness and personality. Personality and Individual Differences, 19, 251–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17, 595–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, M. E., Treviño, L. K., & Harrison, D. A. (2005). Ethical leadership: A social learning perspective for construct development and testing. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 117–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bycio, P. (1992). Job performance and absenteeism: A review and meta-analysis. Human Relations, 45, 193–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreyrou, J. (2018). Theranos and CEO punished for fraud. The Wall Street Journal, March 15, 2018, A1.

  • Charbonnier-Voirin, A., El Akremi, A., & Vandenberghe, C. (2010). A multilevel model of transformational leadership and adaptive performance and the moderating role of climate for innovation. Group & Organization Management, 35, 699–726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Methodology for business and management. Modern methods in business research (pp. 295–336). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chun, J. U., Yammarino, F. J., Dionne, S. D., Sosik, J. J., & Moon, H. K. (2009). Leadership across hierarchical levels: Multiple levels of management and multiple levels of analysis. The Leadership Quarterly, 20, 698–707.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway, J. M., & Lance, C. E. (2010). What reviewers should expect from author regarding common method bias in organizational research. Journal of Business Psychology, 25, 325–334.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M., Mazutis, D., & Seijts, G. (2013). In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 113, 567–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damen, F., van Knippenberg, D. L., & van Knippenberg-Wisse, B. (2008). Leader affective displays and attributions of charisma: The role of arousal. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(10), 2594–2614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Nisi, A. S., & Peters, L. H. (1996). Organization of information in memory and the performance appraisal process: Evidence from the field. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 717–737.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Rue, D. S., Nahrgang, J. D., Wellman, N. E. D., & Humphrey, S. E. (2011). Trait and behavioral theories of leadership: An integration and meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Personnel Psychology, 64, 7–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Den Hartog, D. N. (2015). Ethical leadership. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 2, 409–434.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 611–628.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emmons, R. A., & Diener, E. (1985). Personality correlates of subjective well-being. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 11, 89–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ensign, R. L., & Eisen, B. (2020). Wells fargo ex-ceo is banned for life. The Wall Street Journal, January 24, 2020, A1.

  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2004). Implicit leadership theories in applied settings: Factor structure, generalizability and stability over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O., & Martin, R. (2005). From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of Implicit leadership theories on leader–member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90, 659–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eva, N., Robin, M., Sendjaya, S., van Dierendonck, D., & Liden, R. C. (2019). Servant Leadership: A systematic review and call for future research. Leadership Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2018.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, J. M. (1981). Beyond attribution theory: Cognitive processes in performance appraisal. Journal of Applied Psychology, 66, 127–148.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (2013). Social cognition: From brains to culture (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • FluidSurveys. (2016). FluidSurveys. Retrieved on April 19, 2018 from, https://fluidsurveys.com

  • Flynn, G. (2008). The virtuous manager: A vision for leadership in business. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 359–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foti, R. J., Hansbrough, T. K., Epitropaki, O., & Coyle, P. T. (2017). Dynamic viewpoints on implicit leadership and followership theories: Approaches, findings, and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galvin, B., Waldman, D., & Balthazard, P. (2010). Visionary communication qualities as mediators of the relationship between narcissism and attributions of leader charisma. Personnel Psychology, 63, 509–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenleaf, R. K. (1977). Servant-leadership: A journey into the nature of legitimate power and greatness. Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R. D., Wang, A. C., Chen, Z., Cheng, B. S., & Farh, J. L. (2018). Transformational Leadership and organizational citizenship behaviour: A moderated mediation model of leader-member-exchange and subordinate’s gender. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 67(4), 617–644.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, R. D., & Wang, Q. (2012). Virtues and leadership: An integrating conceptual framework founded in Aristotelian and Confucian perspectives on virtues. Management Decision, 50, 868–899.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansbrough, T. K., Lord, R. G., & Schyns, B. (2015). Reconsidering the accuracy of follower leadership ratings. The Leadership Quarterly, 26, 220–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harms, P. D., & Credé, M. (2010). Emotional intelligence and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17, 5–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, M. M. (1994). Rater motivation in the performance appraisal context: A theoretical framework. Journal of Management, 20, 735–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartman, E. M. (1998). The role of character in business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly, 8, 547–559.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoch, J. E., Bommer, W. H., Dulebohn, J. H., & Wu, D. (2018). Do ethical, authentic, and servant leadership explain variance above beyond transformational leadership? A meta-analysis. Journal of Management, 44, 501–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howell, J. M. (1988). Two faces of charisma: Socialized and personalized leadership in organizations. In J. A. Conger & R. N. Kanungo (Eds.), Charismatic leadership (pp. 213–236). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Inceoglu, I., Thomas, G., Chu, C., Plans, D., & Gerbasi, A. (2018). Leadership behavior and Employee well-being: An integrated review and a future research agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 29, 179–202.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Judge, T. A., & Watanabe, S. (1993). Another look at the job–life satisfaction relationship. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 939–948.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kark, R., Shamir, B., & Chen, G. (2003). The two faces of transformational leadership: Empowerment and dependency. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E. K., Turner, N., Barling, J., & Loughlin, C. (2012). Transformational leadership and employee psychological well-being: The mediating role of employee trust in leadership. Work and Stress, 26, 39–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kostov, N. (2019). France’s orange convicted of harassment. The Wall Street Journal, December 21–22, 2019. B3.

  • Krouse, S. (2020). WorldCom chief was imprisoned over fraud. The Wall Street Journal, February 4, 2020, B5.

  • Levy, P. E., & Williams, J. R. (2004). The social context for performance appraisal: A review and framework for the future. Journal of Management, 30, 881–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G. (1985). An information processing approach to social perceptions, leadership and behavioral measurement in organizations. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7, 87–128.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., & Dinh, J. E. (2014). What have we learned that is critical in understanding leadership perceptions and leader-performance relations? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 158–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lord, R. G., & Maher, K. J. (1990). Alternative information-processing models and their implications for theory, research and practice. Academy of Management Review, 15, 9–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, P., Eisenberger, R., & Armeli, S. (1999). Perceived organizational support: Inferior versus superior performance by wary employees. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(4), 467–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue. Notre Dame, IA: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinko, M. J., Mackey, J. D., Moss, S. E., Harvey, P., & Brees, J. R. (2018). An exploration of the role of subordinate affect in leader evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 103(7), 738–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Yarker, J., Brenner, S.-O., Randall, R., & Borg, V. (2008). The importance of transformational leadership style for the well-being of employees working with older people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63, 465–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, K., Yarker, J., Randall, R., & Munir, F. (2009). The mediating effects of team and self-efficacy on the relationship between transformational leadership, and job satisfaction and psychological well-being in healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 1236–1244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ng, T. W. H., & Feldman, D. C. (2015). Ethical leadership: Meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100(3), 948–965. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, P. G., Foti, R. J., Hauenstein, N. M., & Bycio, P. (2009). Are the best leaders both transformational and transactional? A pattern-oriented analysis. Leadership, 5, 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S. (2014). Motivation of public managers as raters in performance appraisal: Developing a model of rater motivation. Public Personnel Management, 43, 387–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, D. (2020). Weinstein gets 23 years in sexual-assault case. The Wall Street Journal, March 12, 2020.

  • Pew Research Center. (2013). Public esteem for military still high. Retrieved on April 19, 2018 from, https://www.pewforum.org/2013/07/11/public-esteem-for-military-still-high/

  • Riggio, R. E., Zhu, W., Reina, C., & Maroosis, J. A. (2010). Virtue-based measurement of ethical leadership: The leadership virtues questionnaire. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 62, 235–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rode, J. C. (2004). Job satisfaction and life satisfaction revisited: A longitudinal test of an integrated model. Human Relations, 57, 1205–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz-Palomino, P., Ruiz-Amaya, C., & Knörr, H. (2011). Employee organizational citizenship behaviour: The direct and indirect impact of ethical leadership. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 244–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, T. L., Sparks, T. E., Campbell, J. P., Handy, K., Ramsberger, P., & Grand, J. A. (2017). Situating ethical behavior in the nomological network of job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32, 253–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher, D. J., Baumann, H. M., Sullivan, D. W., Levy, P. E., Hargrove, D. C., & Barros-Rivera, B. A. (2018). Putting the system into performance management systems: A review and agenda for performance management research. Journal of Management, 44, 2209–2245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, J. A. (in press). Do trends matter? The effects of dynamic performance trends and personality traits on performance appraisals. Academy of Management Discoveries.

  • Scullen, S. E., Mount, M. K., & Goff, M. (2000). Understanding the latent structure of job performance ratings. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 956–970.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, B., House, R. J., & Arthur, M. B. (1993). The motivational effects of charismatic leadership: A self-concept based theory. Organizational Science, 4, 577–594.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shondrick, S. J., Dinh, J. E., & Lord, R. G. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: Applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 21, 959–978.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singer, M. (2000). Ethical and fair work behavior: A normative empirical dialogue Concerning ethics and justice. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 187–209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinnicks, M. (2018). Leadership after virtue: MacIntyre’s critique of management reconsidered. Journal of Business Ethics, 147(4), 735–746. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-016-3381-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sison, A. J. G. (2003). The moral capital of leaders: Why virtue matters. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sturm, R. E., Vera, D., & Crossan, M. M. (2017). The entanglement of leader character and leader competence and its impact on performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 28, 349–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thun, B., & Kelloway, K. E. (2011). Virtuous leadership: Assessing character strengths in the workplace. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 28, 270–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tziner, A., Fein, E. C., & Birati, A. (2014). Tempering hard times: Integrating well-being metrics into utility analysis. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 7, 554–568.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vriens, D., Achterbergh, J., & Gulpers, L. (2018). Virtuous structures. Journal of Business Ethics, 150, 671–690.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, G., Oh, I.-S., Courtright, S. H., & Colbert, A. E. (2011). Transformational leadership and performance across criteria and levels: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of research. Group & Organization Management, 36, 223–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Q., & Hackett, R. D. (2016). Conceptualization and measurement of virtuous leadership: Doing well by doing good. Journal of Business Ethics, 137, 321–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woehr, D. J., & Feldman, J. (1993). Processing objective and question order effects on the causal relation between memory and judgment in performance appraisal: Tip of the iceberg. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 232–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, C. (2014). Does ethical leadership lead to happy workers? A study on the impact of ethical leadership, subjective well-being, and life happiness in the Chinese culture. Journal of Business Ethics, 123, 513–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Dr. Peter Bycio for his critical review and input into the various drafts of this manuscript, and Mojan Naisani for her assistance in both preparing the Qualtrics survey and independently verifying the Study 2 data analyses. We also gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (SSHRC, Grant# 435-2014-1151).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business, University of Washington - Bothell, 18115 Campus Way NE, Box 358533, Bothell, WA, 98011-8246, USA

    Afif G. Nassif

  2. DeGroote School of Business, Ron Joyce Centre, McMaster University, 4350 S Service Rd, Room 424, Burlington, ON, L7L 5R8, Canada

    Rick D. Hackett

  3. The Centre for Business, George Brown College, 200 King St. E., Room 607, Toronto, ON, M5A 3W8, Canada

    Gordon Wang

Authors
  1. Afif G. Nassif
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rick D. Hackett
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gordon Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Afif G. Nassif.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nassif, A.G., Hackett, R.D. & Wang, G. Ethical, Virtuous, and Charismatic Leadership: An Examination of Differential Relationships with Follower and Leader Outcomes. J Bus Ethics 172, 581–603 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04491-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04491-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation