Abstract
Online education lacks the moral and ethical engagement as well as the empathic interactions that are essential and integral to true liberal education, including business. While the online venue can provide useful information and put libraries at the hands of the student or employee, there is an implicit lack of focus on the sacredness and centrality of the person, his or her values, attitudes, needs, and expectations. The focus of online education is on the delivery of data, not the student’s engagement with the material or the process. Critically absent from online education is the ability to explore the transformation of data as it changes, first to information, then to knowledge, and finally to wisdom, within each person. Finally, absent is the ability to raise the level of abstraction. Since all needs to be measurable in concrete terms in online education, we are left with the language of metrics, such as deliverables, outcomes, inputs, and outputs. Where is the person in all of this? Where is the focus on the moral compass that is so necessary in any type of education?
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adams, J., & DeFleur, M. (2006). The acceptability of online degrees earned as a credential for obtaining employment. Communication Education, 55(1), 32–45.
Bart, M. (Ed.). (2012, February 1). Online student engagement tools and strategies. Retrieved December 29, 2014, from www.facultyfocus.com/wp-content/uploads/images/FF-Online-Student-Engagement-Report.pdf.
Batson, C.D., R.R. Klein, L. Highberger, and L.L. Shaw, 1995. Immorality from empathy-induced altruism: When compassion and justice conflict. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 1042 Perso.
Bejerano, A. (2008). Face-to-face or online instruction? Face-to-face is better. Communication Currents, 3(3).
Bolman, L., & Deal, T. (1997). Reframing organizations: Artistry, choice, and leadership (2nd ed.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Briskin, A. (1998). The stirring of soul in the workplace. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Brockman, J. (1996). Digerati: Encounters with the cyber elite. San Francisco: HardWired.
Brown, S. P. (1996). A meta-analysis and review of organizational research on job involvement. Psychological Bulletin, 120, 235–255.
Community vs. Culture. (2011, January 3). Retrieved December 29, 2014, from http://memexplex.com/meme/203/.
Floyd, L., Xu, F., Atkins, R., & Caldwell, C. (2013). Ethical outcomes and business ethics: Toward improving business ethics education. Journal of Business Ethics, 117, 753–776.
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. New York: Bantam.
Graham, C., Cagiltay, K., Lim, B. R., Craner, J., & Duffy, T. (2001). Seven principles of effective teaching: A practical lens for evaluating online courses. The technology source. Retrieved October 15, 2014 from http://www.technologysource.org/article/274/.
Kahn, W. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724.
Kelly, R. (2010, February 1). Enhance learning opportunities with just-in-time instructional support. Retrieved July 7, 2014, from http://www.facultyfocus.com/articles/instructional-design/enhance-learning-opportunities-with-just-in-time-instructional-support/.
Natale, S. (1972). An experiment in empathy. Slough: National Foundation for Educational Research.
Natale, S., Libertella, A., & Doran, C. (2014). Empathy: A leadership quintessential. In K. Pavlovich & K. Krahnke (Eds.), Organizing through empathy. New York: Routledge.
Natale, S., & Sora, S. (2010). Ethics in strategic thinking: Business processes and the global market collapse. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 309–316.
Oelsner, J., Lippold, M., & Greenberg, M. (2011). Factors influencing the development of school bonding among middle school students. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 31(3), 463–487.
Pfeil, U., & Zaphiris, P. (2007). Patterns of empathy in online communication. CHI 2007 reach beyond : Conference proceedings : Conference on human factors in computing systems, San Jose, California, USA, April 28–May 3, 2007 (pp. 919–928). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
Roberto, M.A., & Edmondson, A.C. (2008). Everest leadership and team simulation. Simulation and Teaching Note. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing. Electronic. (Product number 2650.).
Solis, B. (2013, July 6). YOU are at the center of The Conversation Prism. Retrieved December 30, 2014, from http://www.briansolis.com/2013/07/you-are-at-the-center-of-the-conversation-prism/.
Straughan, R. (2000). Revisiting wilson MA, April 28–May 3. Journal of Moral Education, 29(3), 367–370.
Useem, J. (2014, May 31). Business School, Disrupted. NY Times. Retrieved October 1, 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/01/business/business-school-disrupted.html?_r=0.
WK Kellogg Foundation. (2001). Characteristics of vibrant partnerships between communities and institutions of higher education. Available at www.wkkf.org. Accessed July 18, 2014).
Wu, M. (2010, June 6). Community vs. social network. Retrieved July 18, 2014, from http://community.lithium.com/t5/Science-of-Social-blog/Community-vs-Social-Network/ba-p/5283.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Natale, S.M., Libertella, A.F. Online Education: Values Dilemma in Business and the Search for Empathic Engagement. J Bus Ethics 138, 175–184 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2566-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2566-8