Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

State Facilitated Economic Abuse: A Structural Analysis of Men Deliberately Withholding Child Support

  • Published:
Feminist Legal Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Economic abuse is well established as a widespread and damaging element of intimate partner violence. However research largely addresses cohabiting couples, with few detailed explorations of women’s longer-term experiences after separation. Further, researchers have not developed a gendered analysis of child support related economic abuse. Such an analysis requires understanding gender as a framework that organises institutions and relationships in ways that build and reproduce hierarchical relations of difference. In this paper, I present data from in-depth interviews with 37 single mothers to pursue a structural analysis of how men’s deliberate withholding of child support (termed child maintenance in some countries) can be a form of economic abuse that is facilitated through gendered state processes and institutions that order child support transfers. I argue that masculine financial discretion structures policy and organizational practices in ways that legitimate men’s financial agency at the expense of women’s financial autonomy. On-going compliance issues are not the result of a failure of Australia’s Child Support Program, but suggest that the state’s role can be one of regulation, not prevention, of economic abuse. Thus, Australia’s Child Support Program normalises the potential for post-separation economic abuse.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, Adrienne E., Cris M. Sullivan, Deborah Bybee, and Megan R. Greeson. 2008. Development of the scale of economic abuse. Violence Against Women 14: 563–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Kristin L. 2005. Theorizing gender in intimate partner violence research. Sex Roles 52: 853–865.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Kristin L. 2007. Who gets out? Gender as structure and the dissolution of violent heterosexual relationships. Gender & Society 21: 173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Kristin L. 2009. Gendering coercive control. Violence Against Women 15: 1444–1457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw, Jonathan, Carol Stimson, Christine Skinner, and Julie Williams. 1999. Absent fathers?. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bumiller, Kristin. 2010. The nexus of domestic violence reform and social science: From instrument of social change to institutionalized surveillance. Annual Review of Law and Social Science 6: 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownridge, Douglas A., Ko Ling Chan, Diane Hiebert-Murphy, Janice Ristock, Agnes Tiwari, Wing-Cheong Leung, and Susy C. Santos. 2008. The elevated risk for non-lethal post-separation violence in Canada: A comparison of separated, divorced, and married women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 23: 117–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Child Support Agency. 2010. Facts and figures 2008–09. Belconnen: Child Support Agency.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Kay. 2013. Child support compliance and tax return non-filing: A feminist analysis. Australian Review of Public Affairs 11: 43–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Kay, Hayley McKenzie, and Kristin Natalier. 2015a. Mothers’ experiences of child support: Qualitative research and opportunities for policy insight. Journal of Family Studies 21: 1–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Kay, Hayley McKenzie, Kristin Natalier, and Lisa Young. 2015b. Institutional processes and the production of gender inequalities: The case of Australian child support research and administration. Critical Social Policy 35: 512–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Kay, and Kristin Natalier. 2013. The gendered framing of Australia’s child support reforms. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 27: 28–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook, Kay, and Kristin Natalier. 2014. Selective hearing: The gendered construction and reception of Inquiry evidence. Critical Social Policy 34: 515–537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Commonwealth of Australia. 2014. Department of Social Services & Department of Human Services: Joint submission to the House of Representatives Standing Committee on Social Policy and Legal Affairs. Inquiry into the Child Support Program. Canberra: DSS and DHS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzolino, Elizabeth, and Christine L. Williams. 2017. Child support queens and disappointing dads: Gender and child support compliance. Social Currents 4: 228–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Human Services. 2017. Overdue child support payments. https://www.humanservices.gov.au/individuals/enablers/overdue-child-support-payments. Accessed 3 Dec 17.

  • Department of Social Services. 2018a. Family assistance guide: 3.1.5.70 Exemptions from the maintenance action test. Australian Government. http://guides.dss.gov.au/family-assistance-guide/3/1/5/70. Accessed 3 Dec 17.

  • Department of Social Services. 2018b. Child support guide. http://guides.dss.gov.au/child-support-guide/2/4. Accessed 3 Dec 17.

  • de Vaus, David, Matthew Gray, Qu Lixia, and David Stanton. 2014. The economic consequences of divorce in Australia. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 28: 26–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diduck, Alison. 1995. The unmodified family: The Child Support Act and the construction of legal subjects. Journal of Law and Society 22: 527–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edin, Kathryn, and Timothy J. Nelson. 2013. Doing the best I can: Fatherhood in the inner city. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edin, Kathryn. 1995. Single mothers and child support: The possibilities and limits of child support policy. Children and Youth Services Review 17: 203–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth, Vivienne. 2017. Custody stalking: A mechanism of coercively controlling mothers following separation. Feminist Legal Studies 25: 185–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth, Vivienne. 2015. From domestic violence to coercive control: Towards the recognition of oppressive intimacy in the family court. New Zealand Sociology 30: 26–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elizabeth, Vivienne, Nicola Gavey, and Julia Tolmie. 2012. The gendered dynamics of power in disputes over the post-separation care of children. Violence Against Women 18: 459–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fehlberg, Belinda, Rae Kaspiew, Jenni Millbank, Fiona Kelly, and Juliet Behrens. 2014. Australian family law: The contemporary context. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fehlberg, Belinda, and Mavis Mclean. 2009. Child support policy in Australia and the United Kingdom: Changing priorities but a similar tough deal for children? International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23: 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, Kathleen J. 1996. The dance of dependency: A genealogy of domestic violence discourse. Hypatia 11: 77–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harding, Sandra. 2009. Standpoint theories: Productively controversial. Hypatia 24: 192–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, Deborah A. 2015. “You just have to look at it as a gift”: Low-income single mothers’ experiences of the child support system. Journal of Poverty 19: 1–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, Brittany E. 2012. Abusive men’s indirect control of their partner during the process of separation. Journal of Family Violence 27: 333–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hearn, Jeff. 1998. The violences of men: How men talk about and how agencies respond to men’s violence to women. London: Sage.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Humphreys, Cathy, and Ravi K. Thiara. 2003. Neither justice nor protection: Women’s experiences of post-separation violence. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 25: 195–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen, Hilde. 2014. What’s gendered about gender-based violence? An empirically grounded theoretical exploration from Tanzania. Gender & Society 28: 537–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe, Peter G., Claire V. Crooks, and Samantha E. Poisson. 2003. Common misconceptions in addressing domestic violence in child custody disputes. Juvenile & Family Court Journal 54: 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laakso, Janice H., and Denise J. Drevdahl. 2006. Women, abuse, and the welfare bureaucracy. Affilia 21: 84–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, Karen. 2005. Stratified reproduction and poor women’s resistance. Gender & Society 19: 660–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie, Hayley, and Kay Cook. 2015. “It should be a big responsibility”: Separated low-income mothers’ evaluation of child support arrangements and the conduct of fathers. Australian Journal of Family Law 29: 135–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMahon, Marylin, and Paul McGorrery. 2016. Emotional abuse, intimidation and economic abuse in the context of family violence: The Tasmanian experience. University of Tasmania Law Review 35: 1–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, Susan L., and Nicole L. Smolter. 2011. “Paper abuse”: When all else fails, batterers use procedural stalking. Violence Against Women 17: 637–650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, John, Suellen Murray, Jenny Chalmers, Sonia Martin, and Greg Marston. 2011. Half a citizen: Life on welfare in Australia. Sydney: Allen and Unwin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natalier, Kristin. 2012a. Means and ends. Why child support money is not used to meet housing costs. Housing Studies 27: 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natalier, Kristin. 2012b. Descriptions of loss and resilience among fathers paying child support. Journal of Family Studies 18: 246–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natalier, Kristin. 2017. Micro-aggressions, single mothers and interactions with government workers: The case of Australia’s child support bureaucracy. Journal of Sociology 53: 622–636.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natalier, Kristin, Kay Cook, and Torna Pitman. 2016. Payee mothers’ interactions with the Department of Human Services-Child Support. Family Matters 97: 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natalier, Kristin, and Belinda Hewitt. 2010. “It’s not just about the money”: Non-resident fathers’ perspectives on paying child support. Sociology 44: 489–505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Natalier, Kristin, and Belinda Hewitt. 2014. Separated parents reproducing and undoing gender through defining legitimate uses of child support. Gender & Society 28: 904–925.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paradies, Yin, and Joan Cunningham. 2009. Experiences of racism among urban indigenous Australians: Findings from the DRUID study. Ethnic and Racial Studies 32: 548–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, Rebecca, Kay Cook, and Ann Taket. 2007. Multiple barriers to obtaining child support: Experiences of women leaving violent partners. Just Policy: A Journal of Australian Social Policy 45: 21–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patrick, Rebecca, Kay Cook, and Hayley McKenzie. 2008. Domestic violence and the exemption from seeking child support: Providing safety or legitimizing ongoing poverty and fear? Social Policy & Administration 42: 749–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Postmus, Judy L., Sara-Beth Plummer, N. Sarah McMahon, Shaanta Murshid, and Mi Sung Kim. 2012. Understanding economic abuse in the lives of survivors. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 27: 411–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qu, Lixia, Ruth Weston, Lawrie Moloney, Rae Kaspiew, and Jessie Dunstan. 2014. Post-separation parenting, property and relationship dynamics after five years. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reilly, Lyndon, and Susan Rees. 2018. Fatherhood in Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: An examination of barriers and opportunities to strengthen the male parenting role. American Journal of Men’s Health 12: 420–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridge, Tess. 2017. The ‘go-between’: Low-income children negotiating relationships of money and care with their separated parents. Children and Society 31: 87–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ridgeway, Cecilia L., and Shelley J. Correll. 2004. Unpacking the gender system. Gender & Society 18: 510–531.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Risman, Barbara J. 1999. Gender vertigo. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Risman, Barbara J. 2004. Gender as a social structure. Gender & Society 18: 429–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sanders, Cynthia K. 2015. Economic abuse in the lives of women abused by an intimate partner: A qualitative study. Violence Against Women 21: 3–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senate Community Affairs Legislation Committee. 2013. Additional budget estimates, 14 February 2013. Answers to questions on notice: Child Support Agency. http://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/Estimates/Live/clac_ctte/estimates/add_1213/DHS/Answers/027.ashx. Accessed 2 Dec 2014.

  • Skinner, Christine, Kay Cook, and Sarah Sinclair. 2017. The potential of child support to reduce lone mother poverty: Comparing population survey data in Australia and the UK. Journal of Poverty and Social Justice 25: 79–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, Christine, and Jacqueline Davidson. 2009. Recent trends in child maintenance schemes in 14 countries. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 23: 25–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smart, Carol, and Bren Neale. 1999. Family fragments?. Cambridge: Polity.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, Dorothy. 1987. The everyday world as problematic: A feminist sociology. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, Bruce, and Paul Henman. 2010. The distributional and financial impacts of the new Australian Child Support Scheme: A ‘before and day-after reform’ comparison of assessed liability. Journal of Family Studies 16: 5–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, Bruce, Maria Vnuk, Bryan Rodgers, and Vu Son. 2014. Can child support compliance be improved by the introduction of a “fairer” child support formula and more rigorous enforcement? The recent Australian experience. Journal of Family Studies 20: 204–220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Evan. 2007. Coercive control: How men entrap women in personal life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stark, Evan. 2009. Rethinking coercive control. Violence Against Women 15: 1509–1525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stylianou, Amanda Mathisen, Judy L. Postmus, and Sarah McMahon. 2013. Measuring abusive behaviors: Is economic abuse a unique form of abuse? Journal of Interpersonal Violence 28: 3186–3204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toews, Michelle L., and Autumn M. Bermea. 2017. “I was naive in thinking, ‘I divorced this man, he is out of my life’”: A qualitative exploration of post-separation power and control tactics experienced by women. Journal of Interpersonal Violence 32: 2166–2189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varcoe, Colleen, and Lori G. Irwin. 2004. “If I killed you, I’d get the kids”: Women’s survival and protection work with child custody and access in the context of woman abuse. Qualitative Sociology 27: 77–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter, Maggie, Belinda Hewitt, Kristin Natalier, Maryanne Wulff, and Margaret Reynolds. 2010. The implications of child support for housing after relationship dissolution. Journal of Family Studies 16: 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, Sarah, Dale Bagshaw, Lana Zannettino, and Valerie Adams. 2015. Financial abuse of older people: A case study. International Social Work 58: 287–296.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (Sociology), Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia

    Kristin Natalier

Authors
  1. Kristin Natalier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kristin Natalier.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Natalier, K. State Facilitated Economic Abuse: A Structural Analysis of Men Deliberately Withholding Child Support. Fem Leg Stud 26, 121–140 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9376-1

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-018-9376-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation