Skip to main content
Log in

The problem of self in Nāgārjuna’s philosophy: a contemporary perspective

  • Open Forum
  • Published:
AI & SOCIETY Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, I would like to examine Nāgārjuna’s idea of the self and its contemporaneity interpretations in philosophy. As we know, Nāgārjuna examines the emptiness (Śūnyatā) of various things in which the emptiness of the self occupies an important position in the Buddhist philosophical tradition. The main aim of this paper is to understand the meaning of emptiness to explain the nature of the self and to show how it is different from the substantial notion of self. However, Nāgārjuna’s idea of the self is not identical with the contemporary materialistic notion of self. The paper is divided into five sections. In the first section, I would like to explain the nature of emptiness in relation to self and how it is different from the substantial self. The second section will focus on the constituents of the self. The third section will bring out the nature of self. In the fourth section and last section, I would like to bring out Nāgārjuna’s idea of the emptiness of the self with respect to the contemporary debates on the nature of self.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bimal M (1989) Nyāya critique of the Buddhist doctrine of non-soul. J Indian Philos 17(1989):76

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore S (2005) Conversations on consciousness. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarti A (1982) The Nyāya proofs for the existence of the soul. J Indian Philos X:222–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandrakirti (1995) Guide to the Middle Way, VI.151. In: Kelsang Gyatso (Translated) Ocean of Nectar: Wisdom and Compassion in Mahayana Buddhism. Thrapa Publication

  • Chatterjee S, Datta D (2008) An introduction to indian philosophy, 8th edn. University of Calcutta, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Christopher G (2003) Philosophy of the Buddha. Routledge, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins S (1982) Selfless persons, imaginary and thought in Therāvāda Buddhim. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • David H (1896) A treatise of human nature. Clarendon Press, England

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett Daniel C (1991) Consciousness explained. Little, Brown and Co, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett DC (1998) Quining Qualia. In: Ned B, Owen F, Güven G (eds) The nature of consciousness. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Devitt M (1991) Realism and truth. Princeton University Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelglass W, Garfield Jay L (2009) Buddhist philosophy: essential readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield JL (1994) Dependent co-origination and the emptiness of emptiness: why did Nāgārjuna begin with causation? Philosophy East and West 44(II):219–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garfield JL (2002) Empty words: buddhist philosophy and cross-cultural interpretation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Garfield JL (2009) Nāgārjuna’s Mulamādhyakārikā (Fundamental Verses of the Middle Way): Chap. 24: Examination of the Four Nobel Truth. In: William E, Garfield JL (eds) Buddhist philosophy: essential readings. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Huntington CW (1989) The emptiness of emptiness. a study of early Indian Mādhyamika. University of Hawaii Press, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalupahana David J (1991) Mulamādhyamakārika of Nāgārjuna: the philosophy of the middle way. Motilal Banrsidass Publishers Private Limited, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagao GM (1991) Mādhyamaka and Yogāchara: A Study of Mahāyana Philosophies. (translated by L. S. Kawamura and G. M. Nagao) New York University Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Narain H (1997) The Madhyamika Mind. Motilal Banarsidass Publishers Private Limited, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Pradhan RC (2005) Rediscovering the metaphysical self. In: Chattopadhyaya DP (ed) Society and Science: Theoretical and Historical Perspectives, Vol. X, Part 2, History of Science, Philosophy and Culture in Indian Civilization. Centre for Studies in Civilization

  • Shoemaker S (1984) Identity, cause and mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson G (1997) The self. J Conscious Stud 4(5–6):405–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerhoff J (2009) Nāgārjuna’s Mādhyamaka: A Philosophical Introduction. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein L (1976) Philosophical Investigations, Part I, (Trans. by Anscombe GEM). Basil Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood Thomas E (1994) Nagarjunian disputations: a philosophical journey through an indian looking-glass. University of Hawaii Press, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi D, Parnas J (1999) Phenomenal consciousness and self-awareness: a phenomenological critique of representational theory. In: Shaun G, Shear J (eds) Models of the self. Imprint Academic, UK

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajakishore Nath.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nath, R. The problem of self in Nāgārjuna’s philosophy: a contemporary perspective. AI & Soc 33, 537–543 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0702-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-017-0702-y

Keywords

Navigation