Skip to main content

Rawls on Inequality, Social Segregation and Democracy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1444 Accesses

Part of the book series: AMINTAPHIL: The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice ((AMIN,volume 5))

Abstract

Latent in John Rawls’s discussion of envy, resentment and voluntary social segregation is a plausible (partial) explanation of two striking features of contemporary American life: (1) widespread complacency about inequality and (2) decreased political participation, especially by the least advantaged members of society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For helpful feedback on this paper, I thank Michael Doan, the participants in the 2012 AMINTAPHIL conference and the editors of this volume.

  2. 2.

    Cited in Stiglitz (2012, 8n27).

  3. 3.

    Stiglitz writes that “[o]nly 42 percent of Americans believe that inequality has increased in the past ten years…Several studies have confirmed that perceptions of social mobility are overly optimistic” (2012, 147). Consider, also, a recent experiment which showed that most Americans radically underestimate the amount of inequality in their society (Norton and Ariely 2011).

  4. 4.

    Rawls says that “the discrepancy between oneself and others is made visible by the social structure and style of life of one’s society. The less fortunate are therefore often forcibly reminded of their situation, sometimes leading them to an even lower estimation of themselves and their mode of living. And … they see their social position as allowing no constructive alternative to opposing the favored circumstances of the more advantaged” (1999, 469).

  5. 5.

    See Rawls (1999, 216) for the distinction between ideal and nonideal theory.

  6. 6.

    See Rawls (1999, 115) on the ‘publicity condition’.

  7. 7.

    For an instructive discussion of Rawls’s ‘congruence argument’, see Freeman (2002).

  8. 8.

    This is a provocative passage, but it has received almost no critical attention. A notable exception is Cohen (2008, 384).

  9. 9.

    For a general account of the aptness of (particular) affective responses to injustice or immorality, see Gibbard (1990) and Nussbaum (2001).

References

  • Alon, Sigal. 2009. The evolution of class inequality in higher education competition, exclusion, and adaptation. American Sociological Review 74: 731–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, Elizabeth. 2010. The imperative of integration. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, Ben. 2011. Attention deficit democracy: The paradox of civic engagement. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, Bill. 2009. The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Boston: Mariner Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, G.A. 2008. Rescuing justice and equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Congressional Budget Office. 2011. Trends in the distribution of household income between 1979 and 2007. Washington, DC: Congress of the United States, Congressional Budget Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditomaso, Nancy. 2013. The American non-dilemma: Racial inequality without racism. New York: The Russell Sage Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economic Policy Institute. 2012. State of working America. http://stateofworkingamerica.org/

  • Freeman, Samuel. 2002. Congruence and the good of justice. In The Cambridge companion to Rawls, ed. Samuel Freeman, 277–315. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbard, Allan. 1990. Wise choices, apt feelings: A theory of normative judgment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massey, Douglas, and Nancy Denton. 1993. American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mishel, Lawrence, Jared Bernstein, and Heidi Shierholtz. 2009. The state of working America 2008/2009. Ithaca: ILR Press, an imprint of Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noah, Timothy. 2012. The great divergence: America’s growing inequality crisis and what we can do about it. New York: Bloomsbury Publishing USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, Michael I., and Dan Ariely. 2011. Building a better America – One wealth quintile at a time. Perspectives on Psychological Science 6: 9–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 2001. Upheavals of thought: The intelligence of emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, R.D. 2001. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1999. A theory of justice, rev. ed. Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, Sean F., and Kendra Bischoff. 2011. Income inequality and income segregation. American Journal of Sociology 116: 1092–1153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saez, Emmanuel. 2008. Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States. Pathways Magazine: 6–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saez, Emmanuel. 2012. Striking it richer: The evolution of top incomes in the United States (Updated with 2009 and 2010 estimates). http://elsa.berkeley.edu/~saez/saez-UStopincomes-2010.pdf

  • Shapiro, Thomas, Tatjana Meschede, and Sam Osoro. 2013. The roots of the widening racial wealth gap: Explaining the black-white economic divide. Waltham, Mass: Institute on Assets and Social Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, Joseph E. 2012. The price of inequality: How today’s divided society endangers our future. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., and D.R. Fry. 2012. The rise of residential segregation by income. Social and demographic trends. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, P., D.R. Kochhar, R. Fry, G. Velasco, and S. Motel. 2011. Wealth gaps rise to record highs between Whites, Blacks and Hispanics. Social and demographic trends. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uslaner, Eric M. 2002. The moral foundations of trust. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkinson, R.G., and K. Pickett. 2009. The spirit level: Why greater equality makes societies stronger. New York: Bloomsbury Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Navin .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Navin, M. (2014). Rawls on Inequality, Social Segregation and Democracy. In: Cudd, A., Scholz, S. (eds) Philosophical Perspectives on Democracy in the 21st Century. AMINTAPHIL: The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice, vol 5. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02312-0_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics