Abstract
Some points are made aboutsubstance properties in their role ofintroducing mass terms. In particular, twoconditions of distributivity and cumulativityof mass predicates expressing these propertiesare not the independent pair they first appearto be. A classification of macroscopicsubstance concepts is developed. This needs tobe complemented in some way by the introductionof a modal qualification reminiscent ofAristotle's distinction between actual andpotential presence of substances in a mixture. Consideration of the latter feature hasprompted Joe Earley to raise the question ofwhether there is any salt in the sea. I try toargue that there is.
Similar content being viewed by others
REFERENCES
F.A. Cotton, G. Wilkinson, C.A. Murillo and M. Bochmann. Advanced Inorganic Chemistry, 6th edn. New York: JohnWiley, 1999.
K. Denbigh. The Principles of Chemical Equilibrium, 4th edn., Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
J. Earley. Why There Is No Salt in the Sea. Abstract for an address to the Seventh Summer Symposium of the International Society for the Philosophy of Chemistry, Tartu, Estonia, 2003a.
J. Earley. Overheads from Talk, 'Why There Is No Salt in the Sea', delivered at the Summer meeting in Tartu, 2003b.
P. Needham. Duhem's Theory of Mixture in the Light of the Stoic Challenge to the Aristotelian Conception. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 33: 685–708, 2002.
P. Needham. Chemical Substances and Intensive Properties. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 988: 99–113, 2003.
F.A. Paneth. The Epistemological Status of the Chemical Concept of Element. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 13: 1–14 and 144-160, 1962.
W.V. Quine. Word and Object. Cambridge,MA: MIT Press, 1960.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Needham, P. Mixtures and Modality. Foundations of Chemistry 7, 103–118 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOCH.0000042889.36764.49
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/B:FOCH.0000042889.36764.49