Skip to main content
Log in

The Human Nature of the Economic Mind

  • Thematic Issue Article: How Evolutionary is Evolutionary Economics?
  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a historical overview of cognitive psychology and computational theories in cognitive science. Critiques of the computational model are discussed. The perspective of the evolution of mind and brain provides an alternative model such as that presented by Merlin Donald in terms of the “Hybrid Mind.” This “naturalist” model is also consistent with what we know of cognitive development in childhood. It provides a better understanding of cognition in situated context than the computational alternatives and is a better fit as a model of mind for the social sciences, including for economic decision making.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Some would put its death closer to 1960 in response to the devastating review of Skinner’s (1957) work by Chomsky (1959), but established fields of theory and experiment do not die so easily or quickly. Many departments of psychology were dominated by learning and only ceded dominance as they began to fragment into different sub-disciplines such as social, personality, developmental, as well as cognitive, all of which had been subsumed within the field of experimental psychology and dominated by learning before 1970.

  2. Extending the model from the Turing machine to artificial intelligence (AI) and then to the symbolic computations of the brain is implicit in the general model, but some recent commentators have denied that this is or ever was the goal (see Oaksford and Chater 2009 for extensive discussion).

  3. The quotation is taken from an early chapter in this work. Edelman’s long postscript lays out the assumptions of the computer model, their reliance on the objectivist view of science, and their inadequacy to explain human cognition in great detail. It is the best clear summary description of the computational model of mind and its fallacies that I know of.

  4. There are many excellent critiques of the EP approach (see especially Buller 2005; Richardson 2007) as well as defenses (see Confer et al. 2010).

  5. Blind infants must attain knowledge of facial configuration through the touch rather than the visual modality, while profoundly deaf infants are shut off from the patterns of oral language but readily tune to the patterns of sign language when these are used by parents or other caregivers. Neither disability restricts the development of normal intelligence.

  6. Whether other animals have episodic memories (in Tulving’s 1983 sense) is not the issue here. That some have memory, both general and specific “one-time” seems indisputable. Donald’s theory states that at Level 1 memory is not recallable voluntarily, only under appropriate environmental conditions.

  7. In this connection much speculation surrounds the discovery of mirror neurons in monkeys later observed in apes and humans, some scholars suggesting that these neurons constitute a mechanism for understanding others’ intentions. Mirror neurons are activated when an animal carries out an action and also when the animal observes such an action carried out by another actor. For example, when an observer monkey watches a man lift a cup to drink, the exact neurons in the monkey’s brain are activated as are active when he lifts his own cup. In a sense this is “backward imitation,” suggesting a mechanism for understanding or predicting the behavior of another. At this point, however, there is no evidence for the utility of such neurons in imitating the other; nor for learning a novel action from observation of the other. That is, they may be used primarily in interpreting the actions of the other.

  8. A dramatic example of this is the common gene for the construction of eyes, which in different species from fruit flies to humans directs “make eye here” even though what an eye is exactly is vastly different in the different species, and where the eye is placed may depend on when the gene is called on (for relatively accessible accounts see Carroll 2005; Blumberg 2009).

  9. Although a strong genetic attachment inheritance may come with that as well, specifically the genetic disposition of mother and child to form an emotional bond as proposed by Bowlby (1982).

  10. On the other hand, oral communication (think of all the cell-phone conversations going on around the world at present) seems to be increasing in its influence rather than withering away.

References

  • Barkow JH, Cosmides L, Tooby LJ (eds) (1992) The adapted mind: evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg MS (2009) Freaks of nature: what anomalies tell us about development and evolution. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowlby J (1982) Attachment and loss. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago University Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown R (1958) Words and things. The Free Press of Glencoe, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner JS, Goodnow JJ, Austin G (1956) A study of thinking. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Buller DJ (2005) Adapting minds: evolutionary psychology and the persistent quest for human nature. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Callaghan EC, Moll H, Rakoczy H, Warneken F, Liszkowski U, Behne T, Tomasello M (2011) Early social cognition in three cultural contexts. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 76(2), Serial Number 299

  • Carroll SB (2005) Endless forms most beautiful: the new science of Evo Devo. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1959) Review of Verbal Behavior by B. F. Skinner. Language 35:26–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chomsky N (1965) Aspects of a theory of syntax. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark A (1997) Being there: putting brain, body, and world together again. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Confer JC, Easton JA, Fleischman DS, Goetz CD, Lewis DMG, Perilloux C, Buss DM (2010) Evolutionary psychology: controversies, questions, prospects, and limitations. Am Psychol 65(2):110–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donald M (1991) Origins of the modern mind. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald M (2000) The central role of culture in cognitive evolution: a reflection on the myth of the “Isolated Mind”. In: Nucci LP, Saxe G, Turiel E (eds) Culture, thought, and development. Erlbaum, Mahwah, pp 19–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald M (2001) A mind so rare: the evolution of human consciousness. Norton, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar R (1996) Grooming, gossip and the evolution of language. Faber and Faber, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Durham WH (1991) Coevolution: genes, culture, and human diversity. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman GM (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire: on the matter of the mind. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank MJ, Cohen MX, Sanfey AG (2009) Multiple systems in decision making. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 18(2):73–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy SB (1999) Mother nature: a history of mothers, infants, and natural selection. Pantheon Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hrdy S (2009) Mothers and others: the evolutionary origins of mutual understanding. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • James W (1890/1950) The principles of psychology. Dover Publications, New York

  • Hutchins E (1996) Cognition in the wild. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller GA (1956) The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol Rev 63:81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (1986) Event knowledge: structure and function in development. Erlbaum, Hillsdale

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (1996) Language in cognitive development: the emergence of the mediated mind. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K (2007) Young minds in social worlds: experience, meaning, and memory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson K, Nelson RR (2002) On the nature and evolution of human know-how. Res Policy 31:719–733

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson RR, Winter SG (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Newell A, Simon HA (1972) Human problem solving. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs

    Google Scholar 

  • Oaksford M, Chater N (2009) Precis of bayesian rationality: the probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Brain Behav Sci 32(1):69–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget J (1970) Piaget’s theory. In: Mussen PH (ed) Carmichaels’ handbook of child development. Wiley, New York, pp 703–732

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin HC (1988) An evolutionary epistemological approach to the evolution of intelligence. In: Jerison HJ, Jerison I (eds) Intelligence and evolutionary biology. Springer-Verlag, New York, pp 73–91

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Posner MI (ed) (1989) Foundations of cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack D (2010) Why humans are unique. Perspect Psychol Sci 5(1):22–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson RC (2007) Evolutionary psychology as maladapted psychology. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart DE (1990) The architecture of mind: a connectionist approach. In: Posner MI (ed) Foundations of cognitive science. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 133–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon HA (1957) Models of man. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner BF (1957) Verbal behavior. Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (1999) The cultural origins of human cognitions. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (2003) Constructing a language: a usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M (2008) The origins of human communication. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello M, Herrmann E (2010) Ape and human cognition: what’s the difference? Curr Dir Psychol Sci 19(1):3–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tulving E (1983) Elements of episodic memory. Oxford University Press, New York

  • Tversky B, Kahneman D (1983) Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: the conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychol Rev 90(4):293–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vygotsky L (1962) Thought and language. MIT Press, Cambridge. Originally published in Russian 1934

  • Vygotsky L (1986) Thought and language, Revised Edition. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson JB (1913) Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychol Rev 20:158–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler MA (2005) Reconstructing the cognitive world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to Richard Nelson for helpful suggestions on this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Katherine Nelson.

Additional information

Dr. Nelson is Distinguished Professor of Psychology Emerita.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nelson, K. The Human Nature of the Economic Mind. Biol Theory 6, 377–387 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0037-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13752-012-0037-3

Keywords

Navigation