Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Anthropomorphism in the Context of Scientific Discovery: Implications for Comparative Cognition

  • Published:
Foundations of Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mentalist view began to lose its standing among psychologists mainly during the first half of the twentieth century. As a result, the enthusiasm to build an objective science began to grow among behaviourists and ethologists. The rise of cognitive sciences around the 1960s, however, revived the debates over the importance of cognitive intervening variables in explaining behaviours that could not be explained by clinging solely to a pure behavioural approach. Nevertheless, even though cognitive functions in nonhuman animals have been identified in many studies, attributing human mental properties to animals is still being criticized as anthropomorphism. Such anthropomorphic attributions have been considered as an open door to the return of subjective methodology. Representation of anthropomorphic attributions as scientific activities within the context of discovery as opposed to the context of justification casts a new light on this problem. The present analysis proposes that anthropomorphic attributions are formed based on top-down idiosyncratic intuitions on the cusp of hypothesis building, outside the context of scientific justification. In other words, an anthropomorphic attribution is a potential creative link between pure observations of behaviours and building testable hypotheses about cognition in the process of scientific discovery. Thus, serving a function within the context of discovery, anthropomorphism does not motivate the return of subjective methodology, simply because it is not inconsistent with the rule-governed path in the context of scientific justification.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Article Open access 19 December 2018

Bence Nanay

Availability of Data and Material:

Not applicable.

Code Availability:

Not applicable.

References

  • Allen, C. (1998). Assessing animal cognition: ethological and philosophical perspectives. Journal of animal science, 76(1), 42–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, K. (2015). “A Role for Folk Psychology in Animal Cognition Research” Experimentation Collection. 66. http://animalstudiesrepository.org/acwp_arte/66

  • Andrews, K., & Huss, B. (2014). Anthropomorphism, anthropectomy, and the null hypothesis. Biology & Philosophy, 29(5), 711–729

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arabatzis, T. (2006). On the inextricability of the context of discovery and the context of justification. Revisiting discovery and justification (pp. 215–230). Dordrecht: Springer

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs, 132, 355–429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, L. (1995). The Evolutionary Contingency Thesis. In G. Wolters & J. Lennox (Eds) Concepts, Theories, and Rationality in the Biological Sciences: The Second Pittsburgh–Konstanz Colloquium in the Philosophy of Science. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press

  • Bekoff, M. (2000). Animal emotions: Exploring passionate natures. Bioscience, 50, 861–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumberg, M. S. (2007). Anthropomorphism and evidence. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 2, 145–146

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolhuis, J. J., & Wynne, C. D. (2009). Can evolution explain how minds work? Nature, 458(7240), 832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boring, E. G. (1953). A history of introspection. Psychological bulletin, 50(3), 169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brent, P. (1981). Charles Darwin: A man of enlarged curiosity. New York: Harper & Row

    Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, P. W. (1927). The logic of modern physics (3 vol.). New York: Macmillan

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruni, D., Perconti, P., & Plebe, A. (2018). Anti-anthropomorphism and its limits. Frontiers in psychology, 9, 2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. (2007). Critical anthropomorphism, uncritical anthropocentrism, and naïve nominalism. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 2, 136–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. (1991). Cognitive ethology and critical anthropomorphism: A snake with two heads and hognose snakes that play dead. In Ristau, C. A. (Ed.), Cognitive ethology: The minds of other animals: Essays in honor of Donald R. Griffin (pp. 53–90). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates

    Google Scholar 

  • Burghardt, G. M. (1985). Animal awareness: Current perceptions and historical perspective. American psychologist, 40(8), 905

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cantlon, J. F., & Brannon, E. M. (2007). Basic math in monkeys and college students. PLoS biology, 5(12), e328

  • Cenami Spada, E., (1997). Amorphism, mechanomorphism, and anthropomorphism. In R.W. Mitchell, N.S. Thompson, & H.L. Miles (Eds), Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes and Animals. (Albany Ž. pp. 37–50). SUNY Press

  • Chomsky, N. (1959). A review of BF Skinner’s Verbal behavior. Language, 35(1), 26–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crist, E. (2002). The inner life of earthworms: Darwin’s argument and its implications. The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition, 1985, 3

  • Darwin, C. (1872). The Expression of the Emotions in Man and Animals. London: Murray; (Reprinted Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1965 with Preface by Konrad Lorenz)

  • de Waal, F. B., & Ferrari, P. F. (2010). Towards a bottom-up perspective on animal and human cognition. Trends in cognitive sciences, 14(5), 201–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. (1999). Anthropomorphism and anthropodenial: consistency in our thinking about humans and other animals. Philosophical Topics, 27(1), 255–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal, F. B. (1997). Are we in anthropodenial. Discover, 18(7), 50–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Duckworth, R. A. (2009). The role of behavior in evolution: A search for mechanism. Evolutionary Ecology, 23(4), 513–531

  • Eaton, T., Hutton, R., Leete, J., Lieb, J., Robeson, A., & Vonk, J. (2018). Bottoms-up! Rejecting top-down human-centered approaches in comparative psychology. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 31

  • Estany, A. (2001). The thesis of theory-laden observation in the light of cognitive psychology. Philosophy of Science, 68(2), 203–217

  • Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 290–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. (1962). Explanation, reduction and empiricism. In Feigl, H., & Maxwell, G., Minnesota studies in philosophy of science (3 vol.). University of Minnesota Press

  • Fitzpatrick, S. (2008). Doing away with Morgan’s canon. Minds Lang, 23, 224–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1978). Prospects for a cognitive ethology. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1(4), 527–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffin, D. R. (1976). The question of animal awareness: Evolutionary continuity of mental experience. Rockefeller Univ. Press

  • Goodrich, G., & Allen, C. (2007). Conditioned anti-anthropomorphism. Comparative Cognition & Behaviour Reviews, 2, 147–150

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, N. R. (1958). Patterns of Discovery: An Inquiry into the Conceptual Foundations of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hausman, D. M. (1997). Causation, agency, and independence. Philosophy of Science, 64, S15–S25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, C. G. (1959). “The logic of functional analysis,” in Symposium on Sociological Theory. New York, NY: Hempel

  • Jaakkola, K. (2014). Do animals understand invisible displacement? A critical review. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 128(3), 225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jimenez-Buedo, M., & Miller, L. M. (2010). Why a trade-off? The relationship between the external and internal validity of experiments. Theoria. Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia, 25(3), 301–321

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamil, A. C. (1998). On the proper definition of cognitive ethology. In Balda, R. P., Pepperberg, I. M., & Kamil, A. C. (Eds.), Animal cognition in nature (pp. 1–29). San Diego: Academic Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Karin-D’Arcy, M. R. (2005). The modern role of Morgan’s canon in comparative psychology. International Journal of Comparative Psychology, 18, 179–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeler, J. F., & Robbins, T. W. (2011). Translating cognition from animals to humans. Biochemical pharmacology, 81(12), 1356–1366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, J. S. (1992). The New Anthropomorphism. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Kintsch, W. (2005). An overview of top-down and bottom-up effects in comprehension: The CI perspective. Discourse processes, 39(2–3), 125–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago press

  • Lakatos, I. (1978). The Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes: Philosophical Papers (I vol.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Langley, P., Simon, H. A., Bradshaw, G. L., & Zytkow, J. M. (1987). Scientific discovery: Computational explorations of the creative processes. MIT press

  • Lieberman, D. A. (1979). Behaviorism and the mind: A (limited) call for a return to introspection. American Psychologist, 34(4), 319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsay, P. H., & Norman, D. A. (2013). Human information processing: An introduction to psychology. Academic press

  • Losee, J. (2001). A historical introduction to the philosophy of science. Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (1960). The integration of plans. In Miller, G. A., Galanter, E., & Pribram, K. H. (Eds.), Plans and the structure of behavior (pp. 95–102). Henry Holt and Co

  • Mitchell, R. W., Thompson, N. S., & Miles, H. L. (1997). Taking anthropomorphism and anecdotes seriously. In Mitchell, R. W., Thompson, N. S., & Miles, H. L. (Eds.), Anthropomorphism, anecdotes, and animals (pp. 3–11). Albany, NY: SUNY Press

    Google Scholar 

  • McClelland, J. L., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1981). An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological review, 88(5), 375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNaughton, B. L., Battaglia, F. P., Jensen, O., Moser, E. I., & Moser, M. B. (2006). Path integration and the neural basis of the ‘cognitive map’. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 7(8), 663–678

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J. (2013). Mentalism as a radical behaviorist views it—Part 1. The Journal of Mind and Behavior, 133–164

  • Morgan, C. L. (1903). An Introduction to Comparative Psychology. (rev. ed.). New York: Scribner

  • Munck, G. L., & Verkuilen, J. (2005). Research designs. Encyclopedia of social measurement, 3, 385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nersessian, N. J. (1992). How do scientists think? Capturing the dynamics of conceptual change in science. Cognitive models of science, 15, 3–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Nemati, F. (2019). The Role of Nature and Brain in Demystifying the “Unreasonable Effectiveness of Mathematics”. Philosophical Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2019.1646895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati, F. (2017). A theoretical framework to explain the superior cognitive competence in humans: A role for the division of labour in the brain. Archives of Neuroscience, 4(1), e36107. https://doi.org/10.5812/archneurosci.36107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati, F. (2015). From parallel mathematical description of action to unparalleled outcome of abstraction: A comparative analysis. Archives of Neuroscience, 2, e2257. https://doi.org/10.5812/archneurosci.22573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati, F., Kolb, B., & Metz, G. A. (2013). Stress and risk avoidance by exploring rats: implications for stress management in fear-related behaviours. Behavioural processes, 94, 89–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nemati, F., & Whishaw, I. Q. (2007). The point of entry contributes to the organization of exploratory behavior of rats on an open field: An example of spontaneous episodic memory. Behavioral Brain Research, 182, 119–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nickles, T. (1985). Beyond divorce: Current status of the discovery debate. Philosophy of Science, 52(2), 177–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norton, J. (2013). Chasing the light: Einstein’s most famous thought experiment. In Brown, J. R., Frappier, M., & Meynell, L. (Eds.), Thought experiments in philosophy, science and the arts (pp. 123–140). New York: Routledge

    Google Scholar 

  • O’keefe, J., & Nadel, L. (1987). The hippocampus as a cognitive map. Oxford, UK: Claredon Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, K. (1911). The Grammar of Science. London: Adam & Charles Black

    Google Scholar 

  • Penn, D. C., & Povinelli, D. J. (2007). On the lack of evidence that non-human animals possess anything remotely resembling a ‘theory of mind’. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1480), 731–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pepperberg, I. M. (2015). Reply to Jaakkola (2014): “Do animals understand invisible displacement? A critical review”. Journal of Comparative Psychology, 129(2), 198–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pflüger, H. J., & Menzel, R. (1999). Neuroethology, its roots and future. Journal of Comparative Physiology A, 185(4), 389–392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1978). Behavior and evolution. New York: Pantheon Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Piaget, J. (1971). Biology and knowledge: An essay on the relations between organic regulations and cognitive processes. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press

  • Piaget, J., & Inhelder, B. (1969). The psychology of the child. London: Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1963). Conjectures and refutations: the growth of scientific knowledge. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, M. I., & Shulman, G. L. (1979). Cognitive science. In Hearst, E. (Ed.), The first century of experimental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum

    Google Scholar 

  • Povinelli, D. J. (2004). Behind the ape’s appearance: Escaping anthropocentrism in the study of other minds. Daedalus, 133(1),29–41

  • Povinelli, D. J., & Bering, J. M. (2002). The mentality of apes revisited. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11(4), 115–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Redish, A. D. (1999). Beyond the cognitive map: From place cells to episodic memory. Cambridge: MIT Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Reichenbach, H. (1966). The rise of scientific philosophy. Berkeley: University of California Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, J., & Sprenger, J. (2014). Scientific objectivity. In Zalta, E. N. (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford: Stanford Universityhttp://plato.stanford.edu/entries/scientific-objectivity

    Google Scholar 

  • Rocke, A. J. (2015). It began with a daydream: the 150th anniversary of the Kekulé benzene structure. Angewandte Chemie, International Edition, 54(1), 46–50. https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.201408034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristau, C. A. (1992). Cognitive ethology: Past, present and speculations on the future. In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association (Vol. 1992, No. 2, pp. 125–136). Philosophy of Science Association

  • Ristau, C. (Ed.). (1991). Cognitive Ethology: The Minds of Other Animals. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publisher

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivas, J. A., & Burghardt, G. M. (2002). Crotalomorphism: A metaphor to understand anthropomorphism by omission. In Bekoff, M., Allen, C., & Burghardt, G. M. (Eds.), The cognitive animal: Empirical and theoretical perspectives on animal cognition (pp. 9–18). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Rollin, B. (1997). “Anecdote, Anthropomorphism, and Animal Behavior.” In R. W. Mitchell, N. Thompson, & H. L. Miles (Eds.), In Anthropomorphism, Anecdotes, and Animals (pp. 125–33). Albany: State University of New York Press

  • Ruse, M. (1973). The Philosophy of Biology. London: Hutchinson & Co

    Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, K. F. (1967). Approaches to reduction. Philosophy of science, 34(2), 137–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schouten, M. K. D., & De Jong, H. L. (1999). Reduction, elimination, and levels: The case of the LTP-learning link. Philosophical Psychology, 12(3), 237–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shettleworth, S. J. (1993). Varieties of learning and memory in animals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 19(1), 5

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F. (1984). The operational analysis of psychological terms. Behavioral and brain sciences, 7(4), 547–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sober, E. (2005). Comparative psychology meets evolutionary biology: Morgan’s canon and cladistics parsimony. In Mitman, G., & Datson, L. (Eds.), Thinking with animals: new perspectives on anthropomorphism ( (pp. 85–99). New York: Columbia University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, S. S. (1935). The operational definition of psychological concepts. Psychological Review, 42, 517–527

  • Suppe, F. (1977). The search for philosophic understanding of scientific theories. In Suppe, F. (Ed.), The structure of scientific theories (2nd ed., pp. 3–241). Urbana: University of Illinois Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, N. S. (1994). The many perils of ejective anthropomorphism. Behavior and Philosophy, 22(2), 59–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, W. (2007). Anthropomorphism revisited. Comparative Cognition & Behavior Reviews, 2, 139–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Timberlake, W. (1997). An animal-centered, causal-system approach to the understanding and control of behavior. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 53, 107–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological review, 55(4), 189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watrin, J. P., & Darwich, R. (2012). On behaviorism in the cognitive revolution: Myth and reactions. Review of General Psychology, 16(3), 269–282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson, J. B., & McDougall, W. (1929). The battle of behaviorism: An exposition and an exposure. WW Norton & Company

  • Watson, J. B. (1913). Psychology as the behaviorist views it. Psychological review, 20(2), 158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, C. D. (2007). What are animals? Why anthropomorphism is still not a scientific approach to behavior. Comparative Cognition and Behavior Reviews, 2, 125–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynne, C. D. (2004). The perils of anthropomorphism. Nature, 428(6983), 606–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The research was not funded by any agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Neuroscience, University of Lethbridge, 4401 University Drive, T1K 3M4, Lethbridge, AB, Canada

    Farshad Nemati PhD

Authors
  1. Farshad Nemati PhD
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Not applicable.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Farshad Nemati PhD.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests:

The author has no conflict of interest to disclose.

Ethics Approval:

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate:

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication:

I, Farshad Nemati, thereby give consent for publication of the manuscript.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nemati, F. Anthropomorphism in the Context of Scientific Discovery: Implications for Comparative Cognition. Found Sci 28, 927–945 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09821-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10699-021-09821-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation