Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Numbers and Arithmetic: Neither Hardwired Nor Out There

  • Published:
Biological Theory Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What is the nature of number systems and arithmetic that we use in science for quantification, analysis, and modeling? I argue that number concepts and arithmetic are neither hardwired in the brain, nor do they exist out there in the universe. Innate subitizing and early cognitive preconditions for number— which we share with many other species—cannot provide the foundations for the precision, richness, and range of number concepts and simple arithmetic, let alone that of more complex mathematical concepts. Numbers and arithmetic, and mathematics in general, have unique features—precision, objectivity, rigor, generalizability, stability, symbolizability, and applicability to the real world—that must be accounted for. They are sophisticated concepts that developed culturally only in recent human history. I suggest that numbers and arithmetic are realized through precise combinations of non-mathematical everyday cognitive mechanisms that make human imagination and abstraction possible. One such mechanism, conceptual metaphor, is a neurally instantiated inference-preserving cross-domain mapping that allows the conceptualization of abstract entities in terms of grounded bodily experience. I analyze how the inferential organization of the properties and “laws” of arithmetic emerge metaphorically from everyday meaningful actions. Numbers and arithmetic are thus—outside of natural selection—the product of the biologically constrained interaction of individuals with the appropriate cultural and historical phenotypic variation supported by language, writing systems, and education.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Antell SE, Keating DP (1983) Perception of numerical invariance in neonates. Child Development 54: 695–701.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bächtold D, Baumöller M, Brugger P (1998) Stimulus-response compatibility in representational space. Neuropsychologia 36: 731–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates E, Benigni L, Bretherton I, Camaioni L, Volterra V (1979) The Emergence of Symbols: Cognition and Communication in Infancy. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates E, Dick F (2002) Language, gesture, and the developing brain. Developmental Psychobiology 40: 293–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bates E, Snyder LS (1987) The cognitive hypothesis in language development. In: Infant Performance and Experience: New Findings with the Ordinal Scales (Ina E, Uzgiris C, McVicker Hunt EJ, eds), 168–204. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bates E, Thal D, Whitesell K, Fenson L, Oakes L (1989) Integrating language and gesture in infancy. Developmental Psychology 25: 1004–1019.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bideaud J (1996) La construction du nombre chez le jeune enfant: Une bonne raison d’affûter le rasoir d’Occam. Bulletin de Psychologie 50: 19–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijeljac-Babic R, Bertoncini J, Mehler J (1991) How do four-day-old infants categorize multisyllabic utterances? Developmental Psychology 29: 711–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boroditski L (2000) Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition 75: 1–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brannon E (2002) The development of ordinal numerical knowledge in infancy. Cognition 83: 223–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butterworth B (1999) What Counts: How Every Brain is Hardwired for Math. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carey S (2004) Bootstrapping and the origin of concepts. Daedalus 133: 59–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caselli MC (1990) Communicative gestures and first words. In: From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children (Volterra V, Erting C, eds), 56–68. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Changeux J-P, Connes A (1998) Conversations on Mind, Matter, and Mathematics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Connes A, Lichnerowicz A, Schötzenberger MP (2000) Triangle de pensées. Paris: Odile Jacob.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider K, Núñez R (2009). Across time, across the body: Transversal temporal gestures. Gesture 9: 181–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis H, Pérusse R (1988) Numerical competence in animals: Definitional issues, current evidence, and new research agenda. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11: 561–615.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S (1997) The Number Sense: How the Mind Creates Mathematics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S (2002) Single-neuron arithmetic. Science 297: 1652–1653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S (2003) The neural basis of the Weber-Fechner law: A logarithmic mental number line. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 145–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Cohen L (1994) Dissociable mechanisms of subitizing and counting: Neuropsychological evidence from simultanagnosic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 20: 958–975.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Izard V, Spelke E, Pica P (2008a) Log or linear? Distinctintuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures. Science 320: 1217–1220.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehaene S, Izard V, Spelke E, Pica P (2008b) Supplementary material to “Log or linear? Distinct intuitions of the number scale in Western and Amazonian indigene cultures.” Science online www.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/320/5880/1217/DC1.

  • Dehaene S, Piazza M, Pinel P, Cohen L (2003) Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 487–506.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier G, Turner M (1998) Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22: 133–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauconnier G, Turner M (2002) The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer MH (2006) The future for SNARC could be stark. Cortex 42: 1066–1068.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler DH, Robson ER (1998) Square root approximations in Old Babylonian mathematics: YBC 7289 in context. Historia Mathematica 25: 366–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gallistel CR, Gelman R, Cordes S (2006) The cultural and evolutionary history of the real numbers. In: Evolution and Culture (Levinson SC, Jaisson P, eds), 247–274. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelman R, Gallistel CR (1978) The Child’s Understanding of Number. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gentner D (2001) Spatial metaphors in temporal reasoning. In: Spatial Schemas and Abstract Thought (Gattis M, ed), 203–222. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs R (ed) (2008) The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaufmann EL, Lord MW, Reese TW, Volkmann J (1949) The discrimination of visual number. American Journal of Psychology 62: 498–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G (1993) The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: Metaphor and Thought (Ortony A, ed), 2nd ed, 201–251. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Johnson M (1999) Philosophy in the Flesh. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Núúez R (1997) The metaphorical structure of mathematics: Sketching out cognitive foundations for a mind-based mathematics. In: Mathematical Reasoning: Analogies, Metaphors, and Images (English L, ed), 267–280. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff G, Núñez R (2000) Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandler G, Shebo BJ (1982) Subitizing: An analysis of its component processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 111: 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menninger K (1969) Number Words and Number Symbols. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes T, Schliemann AL, Carraher D (1993) Street Mathemathics and School Mathematics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (1995) What brain for God’s-eye? Biological naturalism, ontological objectivism, and Searle. Journal of Consciousness Studies 2: 149–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (1997) Eating soup with chopsticks: Dogmas, difficulties, and alternatives in the study of conscious experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies 4: 143–166.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (1999) Could the future taste purple? Reclaiming mind, body, and cognition. In: Reclaiming Cognition: The Primacy of Action, Intention, and Emotion (Núñez R, Freeman WJ, eds), 41–60. Thorverton, UK: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (2005) Creating mathematical infinities: The beauty of transfinite cardinals. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1717–1741.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (2006) Do real numbers really move? Language, thought, and gesture: The embodied cognitive foundations of mathematics. In: 18 Unconventional Essays on the Nature of Mathematics (Hersh R, ed), 160–181. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (2008a) Proto-numerosities and concepts of number: Biologically plausible and culturally mediated top-down mathematical schemas. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 665–666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (2008b) Reading between the number lines. Science 231: 1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (2008c) Mathematics, the ultimate challenge to embodiment: Truth and the grounding of axiomatic systems. In: Handbook of Cognitive Science: An Embodied Approach (Calvo P, Gomila T, eds), 333–353. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R (in press) Enacting infinity: Bringing transfinite cardinals into being. In: Enaction: Towards a New Paradigm in Cognitive Science (Stewart J, Gapenne O, Di Paolo E, eds). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • Núñez R (submitted) No innate number line in the human brain.

  • Núñez R, Lakoff G (1998) What did Weierstrass really define? The cognitive structure of natural and ε-δ continuity. Mathematical Cognition 4(2): 85–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R, Lakoff G (2005) The cognitive foundations of mathematics: The role of conceptual metaphor. In: Handbook of Mathematical Cognition (Campbell J, ed), 109–124. New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R, Motz B, Teuscher U (2006) Time after time: The psychological reality of the ego- and time-reference-point distinction in metaphorical construals of time. Metaphor and Symbol 21: 133–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Núñez R, Sweetser E (2006) With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the cross-linguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science 30: 401–450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rips LJ, Bloomfield A, Asmuth J (2008) From numerical concepts to concepts of number. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 31: 623–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ristic J, Wright A, Kingstone A (2006) The number line effect reflects top-down control. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review 13: 862–868.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robson E (2008) Mathematics in Ancient Irak. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rotman B (1987) Sygnifying Nothing: The Semiotics of Zero. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santens S, Gevers W (2008) The SNARC effect does not imply a mental number line. Cognition 108: 263–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard, R (2001) Perceptual-cognitive universals as reflections of the world. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 581–601.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shore C, Bates E, Bretherton I, Beeghly M, O’Connell B (1990) Vocal and gestural symbols: Similarities and differences from 13 to 28 months. In: From Gesture to Language in Hearing and Deaf Children (Volterra V, Erting C, eds), 79–91. New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss MS, Curtis LE (1981) Infant perception of numerosity. Child Development 52: 1146–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweetser E (1990) From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Talmy L (1988) Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science 12: 49–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Talmy L (2003) Toward a Cognitive Semantics. Vol. 1: Concept Structuring Systems. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Loosbroek E, Smitsman AW (1990) Visual perception of numerosity in infancy. Developmental Psychology 26: 916–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilden A (1972) System and Structure: Essays in Communication and Exchange. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wynn K (1992) Addition and subtraction by human infants. Nature 358: 749–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu F, Spelke E (2000) Large number discrimination in 6-month-old infants. Cognition 74: B1–B11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rafael Núñez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Núñez, R. Numbers and Arithmetic: Neither Hardwired Nor Out There. Biol Theory 4, 68–83 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.1.68

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/biot.2009.4.1.68

Keywords

Navigation