Abstract
The aim of this paper is to analyze an Intensive Care Unit case that required ethics consultation at a University Hospital in Northern Italy. After the case was resolved, a retrospective ethical analysis was performed by four clinical ethicists who work in different healthcare contexts (Italy, the United States, and Switzerland). Each ethicist used a different method to analyze the case; the four general approaches provide insight into how these ethicists conduct ethics consultations at their respective hospitals. Concluding remarks examine the similarities and differences among the various approaches and offer a reflection concerning the possibility of a shared resolution to the case. The authors’ efforts to come to a tentative consensus may serve as an example for professionals working in medical contexts that reflect an increasing pluralism of values. This article aims to respond to some of these concerns by illustrating how different methods in clinical ethics would be used when considering a real case. The goal is not to establish the best model (if there is one) on a theoretical level, but to learn from actual practice in order to see if there are common elements in the different methods, and to validate their pertinence to clinical ethics consultation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Albrecht, G. L., and P. J. Devlieger. 1999. The Disability Paradox: High Quality of Life Against All Odds. Social Science and Medicine 48 (8): 977–988.
American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. 2009. Improving Competencies in Clinical Ethics Consultation. Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.
American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. 2011. Core Competencies Update Task Force. Core competencies for health care ethics consultation: A report of the American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. Glenview: American Society for Bioethics and Humanities.
Ausilio, M. P., R. M. Arnold, and S. G. Youngner. 2000. Health Care Ethics Consultation: Nature, Goals and Competencies. A Position Paper from the Society for Health and Human Values-Society for Bioethics Consultation Task Force on Standards for Bioethics Consultation. Annals on Internal Medicine 133 (1): 59–69.
Beauchamp, T. L., and J. Childress. 2012. Principles of Biomedical Ethics. 7th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Beauchamp, T. L., L. Walters, J. P. Kahn, and A. C. Mastroianni. 2008. Contemporary Issues in Bioethics. Belmont: Thomson Wadsworth.
Berlinger, N., B. Jennings, and S. M. Wolf. 2013. The Hastings Center Guidelines for Decision on Life-Sustaining Treatment and Care Near the End of Life, revisited and expanded. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Bravo, G., M. Sene, and M. Arcand. 2018. Making Medical Decisions for an Incompetent Older Adult When Both a Proxy and an Advance Directive are Available: Which is More Likely to Reflect the Older Adult’s Preferences? Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (7): 498–503.
Brody, H., and M. Clark. 2014. Narrative Ethics: A Narrative. Narrative Ethics: The Role of Stories in Bioethics, special report. Hastings Center Report 44 (1): S7–S11.
Deledda, G., F. Moretti, M. Rimondini, and C. Zimmermann. 2013. How Patients Want Their Doctor to Communicate. A Literature Review on Primary Care Patients’ Perspectives. Patient Education and Counseling 90: 297–306.
DeMartino, E. S., D. M. Dudzinski, and C. K. Doyle, et al. 2017. Who Decides When a Patient Can't? Statutes on Alternate Decision Makers. New England Journal of Medicine 376 (15): 1478–1482.
Engelhardt, H. T. Jr. 2010. Beyond the Best Interests of Children: Four Views of the Family and of Foundational Disagreements Regarding Pediatric Decision Making. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35: 499–517.
Family Health Care Decisions Act. Public Health Law Article 29-CC, Sess. 2010 (New York 2010): https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/laws/PBH/A29-C.
Feder-Kittay, E. 2006. The Concept of Care Ethics in Biomedicine: The Case of Disability. In Bioethics in Cultural Contexts. Reflections on Methods and Finitude, eds. Christoph Rehmann-Sutter, Marcus Düwell, Dietmar Mieth, 319–340. Dordrecht: Springer.
Frank, A. W. 2014. Narrative Ethics as Dialogical Storytelling. Narrative Ethics: The Role of Stories in Bioethics, Special Report. Hastings Center Report 44 (1): S16–S20.
Giannini, A., A. Pessina, and E. Tacchi. 2003. End-of-Life Decisions in Intensive Care Units: Attitudes of Physicians in an ITALIAN Urban Setting. Intensive Care Medicine 29: 1902–1910.
Jansen, L. A., and D. P. Sulmasy. 2002. Proportionality, Terminal Suffering and the Restorative Goals of Medicine. Theoretical Medicine 23: 321–337.
Jonsen, A. R., M. Siegler, and W. J. Winslade. 2010. Clinical Ethics, a Practical Approach to Ethical Decisions in Clinical Medicine. New York: McGraw Hill.
Kopelman, L. M. 1997. The Best-Interests Standard as Threshold, Ideal, and Standard of Reasonableness. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 22 (3): 271–289.
Kopelman, L. M., and A. E. Kopelman. 2007. Using a New Analysis of the Best Interests Standard to Address Cultural Disputes: Whose Data, Which Values? Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 28: 373–391.
Lang, F., and T. Quill. 2004. Making Decisions with Families at the End of Life. American Family Physician 70 (4): 719–723.
Montello, M. 2014. Narrative Ethics. Narrative Ethics: The Role of Stories in Bioethics, Special Report. Hastings Center Report 44 (1): S2–S6.
Nicoli, F., and M. Picozzi. 2017. Killing or Allowing Someone to Die: A Difference Defined Exclusively by the Criteria of “Terminal? Making Decisions Regarding a Patient’s Death. Medicina Historica 1/1: 41–48.
Parker, S. M., J. M. Clayton, K. Hancock, P. N. Butow, S. Carrick, D. Currow, D. Ghersi, P. Glare, R. Hagerty, and M. H. Tattersall. 2007. A Systematic Review of Prognostic/End- of-Life Communication with Adults in the Advanced Stages of a Life-Limiting Illness: Patient/Caregiver Preferences for the Content, Style, and Timing of Information. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management 34 (1): 81–93.
Pellegrino, E. D., and D. C. Thomasma. 1988. For the Patient’s Good: The Restoration of Beneficence in Health Care. New York: Oxford University Press.
Perkins, H. S. 2016. A Guide to Psychosocial and Spiritual Care at the End of Life. New York: Springer.
Porz, R. 2016. Ethische Theorien als gedankliche Tools—Die Care Ethics. Teil 4 der Serie. Klinische Ethik neu Gedacht. Schweizerische Ärztezeitung 97 (7): 262–265.
Rhodes, R. 2008. The Professional Responsibilities of Medicine. eds. R. Rhodes, L. P. Francis, and A. Silvers. The Blackwell Guide to Medical Ethics, 71–87. Hoboken: Blackwell.
Rhodes, R., and D. Alfandre. 2007. A Systematic Approach to Clinical Moral Reasoning. Clinical Ethics 2 (2): 66–70.
Rhodes, R., and I. R. Holzman. 2004. The Not Unreasonable Standard for Assessment of Surrogates and Surrogate Decisions. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 25 (4): 367–385.
Salter, E. K. 2012. Deciding for a Child: A Comprehensive Analysis of the Best Interest Standard. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 33(3): 179–198.
Shalowitz, D. I., E. Garrett-Mayer, and D. Wendler. 2006. The Accuracy of Surrogate Decision Makers: A Systematic Review. Archives of Internal Medicine 166 (6): 493–497.
Sulmasy, D. P., K. Haller, and P. B. Terry. 1994. More Talk, Less Paper: Predicting the Accuracy of Substituted Judgments. American Journal of Medicine 96 (5): 432–438.
Sulmasy, D. P., P. B. Terry, C. S. Weisman, D. J. Miller, R. Y. Stallings, M. A. Vettese, and K. B. Haller. 1998. The Accuracy of Substituted Judgments in Patients with Terminal Diagnoses. Annals of Internal Medicine 128 (8): 621–629.
Swidler, R. N. 2010. The Family Health Care Decisions Act: A Summary of Key Provisions. Health Law Journal 15 (1): 32–35.
Tarzian, A. J., and L. D. Wocial, ASBH Clinical Ethics Consultation Affairs Committee. 2015. A Code of Ethics and Professional Responsibilities for Health Care Ethics Consultants: Journey to the Present and Implications for the Field. American Journal of Bioethics 15(5): 38–51.
Tomlinson, T. 1999. Ethics Consultant: Problem Solver or Spiritual Counselor? Human Studies 22 (1): 43–52.
Tong, R. 1997. Feminist Approaches to Bioethics: Theoretical Reflections and Practical Applications. Boulder: Westview Press.
Tronto, J. C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
Welie, J. V. M., and A. M. J. ten Have. 2014. The Ethics of Forgoing Life-Sustaining Treatment: Theoretical Considerations and Clinical Decision Making. Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine 9: 14.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nicoli, F., Cummins, P., Raho, J.A. et al. “If an acute event occurs, what should we do?” Diverse ethical approaches to decision-making in the ICU. Med Health Care and Philos 22, 475–486 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09887-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09887-6