Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Multiple Communities and Controlling Corruption

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corruption presents an assurance problem to businesses: all businesses are best off if none act corruptly but in the event that corruption occurs are better off if they act corruptly than if they do not, and because there is no assurance that other actors are not cheating a business does not know how to act. The usual solution to an assurance problem – criminal sanctions imposed on cheaters – does not work in a corrupt system. Integrative Social Contract Theory suggests a solution to the assurance problem. Application of Integrative Social Contract Theory to corruption demonstrates that in the case of corruption it has advantages over international law, and that the theory’s elegance lies in its recognition of norms generated by multiple communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akçay, S.: 2006, “Corruption and Human Development” CATO Journal, 26(1), 29-48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod, R.: 1984, The Evolution of Cooperation, (Basic Books, NY).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader, M.B. and B. Shaw: 1983, “Amendment of the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,” New York University Journal of International Law & Politics 15, 627-652.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruhl, A.P.: 2003, “Public Reason as a Public Good,” 4 The Journal of Law in Society 4, 217-274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleary, J.C. and P. Higonnet: 1987, “Plasticity Into Power: Two Crises in the History of France and China,” Northwestern University Law Review 81, 664-692.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delaney, P.X.: 2007, “Transnational Corruption: Regulation Across Borders,” Virginia Journal of International Law 47, 413-461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dhammaratana, U.: 1972, “The Social Philosophy of Buddhism,” in S. Rinpoche (ed.), The Social Philosophy of Buddhism (Central Institute of Higher Tibetan Studies, Varanasi, India) pp. 1-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T.W. Dunfee 1994, “Toward a Unified Conception of Business Ethics: Integrative Social Contracts Theory,” Academy of Management Review 19(2) 252-284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T.W. Dunfee 1995, Integrative Social Contracts Theory: A Communitarian Conception of Economic Ethics,” Economics & Philosophy 11(1), 85-112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T. and T.W. Dunfee: 1999, Ties that Bind: A Social Contracts Approach to Business Ethics, (Harvard Business School Press, Boston, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W. 1993, “The Role of Ethics in International Business,” in T.W. Dunfee and Y. Nagayasu (eds.), Business Ethics: Japan and the Global Economy (Kluwer Academic, Boston, MA), pp.63-80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W.: 1999, “Challenges to Corporate Governance: Corporate Governance in a Market Without Morality,” Law & Contemporary Problems 62(3), 129-157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunfee, T.W., N.C. Smith and W.T. Ross.: 1999, “Social Contracts and Marketing Ethics,” Journal of Marketing 63(3), 14-32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getz, K.A. 1990, “International Codes of Conduct: An Analysis of Ethical Reasoning,” Journal of Business Ethics 9(7), 567-577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, C.W. and W.W. Jarosz.: 1995, “Law and the Regulation of Foreign Direct Investment: The Experience from Central and Eastern Europe,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 33, 1-39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harsanyi, J.C.: 1986, “Advances in Understanding Rational Behavior,” in J. Elster (ed.), Rational Choice (New York University Press, New York, NY), pp.82-107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, D.: 2009. ‘Catalyzing Corporate Commitment to Combating Corruption’, Journal of Business Ethics 85

  • Hess, D. and T. W. Dunfee: 2000, ‘Fighting Corruption: A Principled Approach; The C2 Principles (Combating Corruption)’, Cornell International Law Journal 33, 593–626

  • Jackson, R.H.: 1987, “Quasi-States, Dual Regimes, and Neoclassical Theory: International Jurisprudence and the Third World,” International Organization 41(4), 519-549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katyal, N.K.: 2003, “Conspiracy Theory,” Yale Law Journal 112, 1307-1398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeley, M.: 1995, “Continuing the Social Contract Condition,” Business Ethics Quarterly 5(2), 241-255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, Jr., C.H.: 2007, “The Devolution of Implementing Policymaking in Network Governments,” Emory Law Journal 57, 167-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koh, H.H.: 1991, “Transnational Public Law Litigation,” Yale Law Journal 100, 2347-2402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Küng, H.: 1997, “A Global Ethic in an Age of Globalization,” Business Ethics Quarterly 7(3), 17-31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lacey, K.A., B. Crutchfield George and C. Stoltenberg.: 2005, “Assessing the Deterrent Effect of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act’s Certification Provisions: A Comparative Analysis Using the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act,” Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law 38, 397-440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lao Tzu, L.: [168 b.c.e.] 1989, Te-Tao Ching, trans. Robert G. Henricks (Ballantine, New York, NY)

  • Nichols, P. M.: 1997, ‘Outlawing Transnational Bribery through the World Trade Organization’, Law and Policy in International Business 28, 305–381

  • Nichols, P.M.: 2004. “Corruption as an Assurance Problem,” American University International Law Review 19, 1307-1349.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nye, J.S.: 1967, “Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis, American Political Science Review 61(2), 417-427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Higgins, E.: 2006, “Corruption, Underdevelopment, and Extractive Resource Industries: Addressing the Vicious Cycle,” Business Ethics Quarterly 16(2), 235-254.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J.: 1971, A Theory of Justice (Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA).

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, O.L.: 2001, “Law, the Rule of Law, and Property: A Foundation for the Private Market and Business Study,” American Business Law Journal 38, 441-473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richman, D.: 2003, “Prosecutors and Their Agents, Agents and Their Prosecutors,” Columbia Law Review 103, 749-832.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, S.B.: 2008, “The World Bank Voluntary Disclosure Program (VDP): A Distributive Justice Critique,” Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 46, 709-731.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman, S.: 2001, The Political Economy of Corruption, (Routledge, London and New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J.: [1775] 1983, On the Social Contract; Discourse on the Origin of Inequality; Discourse on Political Economy, trans. and ed. D. A. Cress (Hackett Publishing Company, Indianapolis, IN)

  • Salbu, S.R.: 1999, “Battling Global Corruption in the New Millennium,” Law & Policy in International Business 31, 47-78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandbu, Martin E.: 2007. “Valuing Processes,” Economics and Philosophy 23(2), 205–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.. 1967, “Isolation, Assurance and the Social Rate of Discount,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 81(1), 112-124.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.K.: 1977, “Rational Fools: A Critique of the Behavioural Foundations of Economic Theory,” Philosophy and Public Affairs 6(4), 317–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, Harbans.: 1986, Degh, Tegh, Fateh: Socio-Economic and Religio-Political Fundamentals of Sikhism (Alam Publishing House, Chandigarh, India).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skyrms, B.: 2004, The Stag Hunt and Evolution of Social Structure (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK).

    Google Scholar 

  • Thakur, U.: 1979, Corruption in Ancient India (Abhinav Publications, Delhi, India).

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations: 2003, ‘United Nations Convention Against Corruption’, General Assembly Resolution 58/4 of 31 October 2003

Download references

Acknowledgments

Tom Dunfee, as a scholar, created an intellectual framework that accounts for multiple communities, in disciplines that often seem preoccupied with simplification and universality. Tom Dunfee, as a colleague, person and friend, exemplified community. He contributed to the growth of dozens of young scholars; he nurtured the creation and growth of academies of business law and of business ethics. His kind words and wry smile irresistibly invited friendship; in conversation he found that which was held in common; he shared what he loved and wanted to share in the joy of others. The impact that Tom Dunfee has had on the academy is self-evident. I would like to gratefully acknowledge the profound impact of Tom Dunfee in my own life and growth.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Philip M. Nichols.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nichols, P.M. Multiple Communities and Controlling Corruption. J Bus Ethics 88 (Suppl 4), 805–813 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0320-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0320-9

Key words

Navigation