Skip to main content
Log in

Confucianism and organ donation: moral duties from xiao (filial piety) to ren (humaneness)

  • Scientific Contribution
  • Published:
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There exists a serious shortage of organs for transplantation in China, more so than in most Western countries. Confucianism has been commonly used as the cultural and ethical reason to explain the reluctance of Chinese and other East-Asian people to donate organs for medical purposes. It is asserted that the Confucian emphasis on xiao (filial piety) requires individuals to ensure body intactness at death. However, based on the original texts of classical Confucianism and other primary materials, we refute this popular view. We base our position on the related Confucian norms of filial piety and ren (humaneness, humanity or benevolence), the tension between differentiated love and universal love, and belief in the goodness of human nature. In light of this, we argue that the Confucian ethical outlook actually calls for organ donation at an individual level, and supports an opt-out (presumed consent) system at the level of social policy. Furthermore, because the popular view is based on a number of dominant but misleading modes of thinking about cultural differences, our revisionist account of Confucian moral duties regarding organ donation has implications for developing a more adequate transcultural and global bioethics. These will be discussed and expanded upon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Literature on Jewish ethics is vast and there are always disagreements, just as it is the case with Confucian ethics or any other major moral tradition. According to Tana D’Bei Eliyahu 27, “If a person has enough food in their house and wishes to use it for charitable purposes to support others, they should first support their father and mother; if there is anything left, they should support their brothers and sisters; if there is anything left, they should support other relatives; if there is anything left, they should support their neighbor; if there is anything left, they should support those who live on the same street. Thereafter, they should distribute charity liberally to the rest of Israel.” And according to Babylonian Talmud Bava Metzia 71a, “Rabbi Yosef taught [about the verse in the Torah that says]: ‘If you lend money to any of my people that are poor with you.’ [This verse teaches that if you have to choose between:] a Jew and a non-Jew, give to the Jew first; a poor person and a rich person, give to the poor person first; a poor relative and poor people in your town, give to your poor relative first; poor people in your town and poor people in another town, give to the poor people of your own town first.” There are of course critical voices within Judaism: Arukh HaShulkhan Yoreh Deah 251:4 questions the above moral position by pointing out that the consequence is that “those poor who have no wealthy relatives will starve” and advocates instead that “Every wealthy man or householder must allocate a portion to poor who are not his relatives, but he should give a larger allocation to those who are his relatives; other categories of priority should be treated the same way.” (Bar-Ilan 2000).

References

(1) Primary Sources

  • Li, S. (1982. edition) 1596. Bencao Ganmu (Compendium of Materia Medica). vol. 2. Beijing: People’s Health Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, Y. 2009. [1812] (ed.) Shisan Jing Zhushu (The Thirteen [Confucian] Classics with Commentaries and Subcommentaries). Vols 5. Beijing, China Bookstore.

(2) Other Chinese and English References

  • Bar-Ilan, University. 2000. The responsa project. Ramat Gan: Bar-Ilan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cai, Y. 2013. On the impacts of traditional Chinese culture on organ donation. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38: 149–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ch’en, Ch’un. 1986. Neo-confucian terms explained [trans. and ed. W. T. Chan]. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan, W. T. 1963. A source book in Chinese philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, Y. P., and L. He. 2011. Million patients for organ transplantation. New Fast Press, C2 (in Chinese). November 14 (quoted in Cai 2013).

  • Chen, J. X., T. M. Zhang, F. L. Lim, H. C. Wu, T. F. Lei, and P. K. Yeong, et al. 2006. Current knowledge and attitudes about organ donation and transplantation among Chinese university students. Tranplantation Proceedings 38 (9): 2761–2765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper, W. C., and N. Sivin. 1973. Man as a medicine: Pharmacological and ritual aspect of traditional therapy using drugs derived from the human body. In Chinese science: Explorations of an ancient tradition, eds. Shigeru Nakayama, and Nathan Sivin, 203–272. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuo, Q., and T. Cui. 2012. The value of Confucian benevolence and the universality of the Confucian way of extending Love. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 7 (1): 20–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding, S. Q., H. Lei, and J. S. Xu. 2010. The study on legal system of organ transplantation and donation. China Healthy Affair Management 5: 325–326. (in Chinese, quoted in Cai 2013).

    Google Scholar 

  • Döring, O. 2009. Körper und Schuldigkeit in der chinesischen Bioethik: Zur philosophischen und practischen Bedeutung von Xiao (“kindliche Pietät”) in der aktuellen Debatte. In Kultur and Bioethik, eds. C. Steineck and O. Döring, 103–122. Baden-Baden: Nomos.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • DTE (Down To Earth) Staff. 2015. Confucian beliefs hindering organ donation in China. Down To Earth, 13 July 2015. https://www.downtoearth.org.in/news/confucian-beliefs-hindering-organ-donation-in-china-48183. Accessed 11 Oct 2018.

  • Ebrey, P. D., ed. 1993 Chinese civilization: A sourcebook, 2nd Ed. The Free Press, New York.

  • Fei, X. 1992. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society (trans. G. G. Hamilton, and Z. Wang). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordign, B., and H. ten Have. 2018. The trilemma of designing international bioethics curricula. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 21: 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ikels, C. 1997. Ethical issues in organ procurement in Chinese societies. China Journal 38: 95–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. G., and J. B. Nie. 2018. Does Confucianism allow body donation? Anatomical Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1771.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, D. G., and M. I. Whitaker. 2009. Speaking for the Dead: The human body in biology and medicine. 2nd ed. Surrey: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lam, W. A., and L. B. McCulough. 2000. Influence of religious and spiritual values on the willingness of Chinese–Americans to donate organs for transplantation. Clinical Transplantation 14: 449–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J. B. 1999. “Human Drugs” in Chinese medicine and the Confucian view: An interpretative study. In Confucian bioethics, eds. Ruiping Fan, 167–210. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J. B. 2011. Medical ethics in China: A transcultural interpretation. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J. B., and R. Fitzgerald. 2016. Connecting the east and the west, the local and the universal: The methodological elements of a transcultural approach to bioethics. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 26 (3): 219–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nie, J. B., and D. G. Jones. 2019. Confucian ethics on the commercial use of human bodies and body parts: yi (righteousness) or/and li (profit)? Anatomic Sciences Education. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1876.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M., A. Woyodt, A. Ahmed, and I. Saif. 2010. Organ donation, transplantation and religion [Editorial Review]. Nephrology Dialysis Transplant 11 (1): 437–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramzy, A. 2013. No quick fixes for china’s overwhelmed organ transplant system.

  • Roetz, H. 1993. Confucian ethics of the axial age. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, W., M. P. Robertson, A. Ballantyne, B. Blakely, R. Catsanos, R. Clay-Williams, and M. F. Singh. 2019. Compliance with ethical standards in the reporting of donor sources and ethics review in peer-reviewed publications involving organ transplantation in China: a scoping review. BMJ Open 9: e024473. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai, M. C. 2009. An Asian perspective on organ donation. Wien Med Wochenschr 159: 452–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, H. 2016. The encyclopedia of global bioethics. Cham: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, D. F. C. 1999. Ancient Chinese medical ethics and the four principles of biomedical ethics. Journal of Medical Ethics 25: 315–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, D. F. C. 2005. The bioethical principles and Confucius’ moral philosophy. Journal of Medical Ethics 31: 159–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, M., ed. 2015. Medical ethics. Beijing: People’s Medical Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X. 2016. Record high for organ donations. China Daily 3 August 2016. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/china/2016-03/08/content_23788169.htm. Accessed 14 Sep 2016.

  • Wang, M., and X. Wang. 2010. Organ donation by capital prisoners in China: Reflections in Confucian ethics. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35: 197–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., L. Bo, and M. Yi. 2015. An analysis of impasse of cadaveric organ donation in our country [China]. Medicine and Philosophy 36 (4A): 13–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T., ed. 2013. Medical ethics. Beijing: Higher Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, K. 2013. The Dao and reasons of the classic of filial piety. Hong Kong: Huizhi Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, L., J. Wang, S. Kwauk, Q. Wu, K. Nielson, F. Zeng, M. Bai, and C. Wang. 2011. Preliminary analysis of factors influencing organ donation rates in China. Transplantation Proceeding 43: 1421–1424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to Arthur Kleinman and David Jones, the paper was presented (by Nie) at the Department of the History of Science, Harvard University, in September 2018. The comments and questions from the audience proved stimulating for the revision of this paper. We thank Ted Kaptchuk and Rabbi Dani Passow for the material on Jewish ethics. The advice by the anonymous reviewer of this journal has also been helpful for revising this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jing-Bao Nie.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nie, JB., Jones, D.G. Confucianism and organ donation: moral duties from xiao (filial piety) to ren (humaneness). Med Health Care and Philos 22, 583–591 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09893-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-019-09893-8

Keywords

Navigation