Skip to main content
Log in

Die deduktiv-nomologische Erklärung als hauptmotiv empirisch-wissenschaftlicher tätigkeit

  • Published:
Erkenntnis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper an attempt is made at developing the notion of a real and complete empirical explanation as excluding all forms of potential or incomplete explanations. This explanation is, however, no longer conceived as the proper aim of empirical science, for it can certainly be gleaned from recent epistemological publications that no comprehensive notion of a real and complete scientific explanation is likely to be constructed from within empirical science. Contrary to common understanding the empirical explanation, deductive-nomological as well as statistical explanation, is considered here only as motive of scientific activities, i.e., as common aim of a transcending cooperation of scientific and non-scientific social practice. Following from this the proper aim of empirical science now consists in the development of practically relevant explanatory theories.

This redetermination of the aim of scientific activities of empirical science also means criticism of the unification of deductive-nomological and statistical explanations, as it has been proposed by Wolfgang Stegmüller in his ‘pragmatisch-epistemische Wende’. For both forms of empirical explanation must be referred to fundamentally different kinds of practical relevance, the former playing a more important role in the advancement of social practice. Stegmüller's development of a comprehensive probabilistic notion of empirical explanation, as tied up to pragmatic knowledge-situations, in a way already transcends a scientifically immanent determination of it, but he seems to have stopped halfway on the road to practically relevant empirical explanations. Several insufficiencies with his probabilistic notion of empirical explanation are shown up in this paper as a consequence of his abiding by pragmatic, and not penetrating to practical, knowledge-situations. The final result of it, however, consists in a clarification and a modification of the concept of deductive-nomological explanation, originally developed by Hempel and Oppenheim.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Literaturverzeichnis

  • Achinstein, Peter: 1983, The Nature of Explanation, New York.

  • Achinstein, Peter: 1971, Law and Explanation, Oxford.

  • Albert, Hans: 1964, ‘Probleme der Theoriebildung. Entwicklung, Struktur und Anwendung sozialwissenschaftlicher Theorien’, in H. Albert (hgg.), Theorie und Realität, Tübingen, SS. 3–70.

  • Braithwaite, R. B.: 1953, Scientific Explanation, New York.

  • Fraassen, Bas C. van: 1977, ‘The Pragmatics of Explanation’, American Philosophical Quarterly 14, 143–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gärdenfors, Peter: 1980, ‘A Pragmatic Approach to Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 47, 404–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, B.: 1979(?), ‘Explanations-Of What?’, manuscript, Stanford University, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hempel, Carl G.: 1965, Aspects of Scientific Explanation, New York.

  • Hempel, C. G. and P. Oppenheim: 1948, ‘Studies in the Logic of Explanation’, Philosophy of Science 15, 135–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holzkamp, Klaus: 1973, Sinnliche Erkenntnis, Frankfurt.

  • Hume, David: 1964, A Treatise of Human Nature, 1739/40, Darmstadt.

  • Hume, David: 1955, Enquiries Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals, 1777, Oxford.

  • Kuhn, Thomas S.: 1962, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago.

  • Kummer, Werner: 1975, Grundlagen der Texttheorie-Zur handlungstheoretischen Begründung einer materialistischen Sprachwissenschaft, Hamburg.

  • Lenk, Hans: 1985, ‘Bemerkungen zur pragmatisch-epistemischen Wende in der wissenschaftstheoretischen Analyse der Ereigniserklärungen’, Erkenntnis 22, 461–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leontjew, A. N.: 1977, Probleme der Entwicklung des Psychischen, 1959, Kronberg/Ts.

  • Marx, Karl: 1953, Grundrisse der Kritik der politischen Ökonomie (Rohentwurf) 1857–8, Berlin

  • Maturana, H. R. and F. J. Varela: 1980, Autopoiesis and Cognition, Dordrecht.

  • Mill, John St.: 1974, A System of Logic Ratiocinative and Inductive, 1843, 2 Bde., Collected Works 7 and 8, Toronto.

  • Nagel, Ernest: 1961, The Structure of Science-Problems in the logic of scientific explanation, New York.

  • Newton, Isaac: 1872, Mathematische Prinzipien der Naturlehre, 1687, Darmstadt, 1963.

  • Newton, Isaac: 1898, Optik, 1704, Braunschweig, 1983.

  • Piaget, Jean: 1974, Understanding Causality, New York.

  • Popper, Karl R.: 1957, ‘Über die Zielsetzung der Erfahrungswissenschaft’, Ratio 1, 21–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rehbein, Jochen: 1977, Komplexes Handeln-Elemente zur Handlungstheorie der Sprache, Diss. FU Berlin.

  • Rescher, Nicholas: 1970, Scientific Explanation, New York.

  • Riedl, Rupert: 1980, Biologie der Erkenntnis, Berlin.

  • Salmon, W.: 1971, ‘Statistical Explanation’ in Salmon u. a., Statistical Explanation and Statistical Relevance, Pittsburgh, SS. 29–87.

  • Schäfer, Lothar: 1974, Erfahrung und Konvention-Zum Theoriebegriff der empirischen Wissenschaften, Stuttgart.

  • Schurz, Gerhard: 1983, Wissenschaftliche Erklärung — Ansätze zu einer logisch-pragmatischen Wissenschaftstheorie, Graz.

  • Sève, Lucien: 1972, Marxismus und Theorie der Persönlichkeit, Frankfurt.

  • Sintonen, Matti: 1984, The Pragmatics of Scientific Explanation, Helsinki.

  • Sneed, Joseph D.: 1971, The Logical Structure of Mathematical Physics, Dordrecht.

  • Stegmüller, Wolfgang: 1983, Erklärung-Begründung-Kausalität, Berlin.

  • Stegmüller, Wolfgang: 1973, Personelle und Statistische Wahrscheinlichkeit, 1. Halbband, Berlin.

  • Stegmüller, Wolfgang: 1969, Wissenschaftliche Erklärung und Begründung, Berlin.

  • Suppes, Patrick: 1970, A Probabilistic Theory of Causality, Amsterdam.

  • Tuomela, Raimo: 1980, ‘Explaining Explaining’, Erkenntnis 15, 211–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, Georg H. von: 1971, Explanation and Understanding, Ithaca, New York.

  • Wright, Georg H. von: 1963, Norm and Action, London.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nierlich, E. Die deduktiv-nomologische Erklärung als hauptmotiv empirisch-wissenschaftlicher tätigkeit. Erkenntnis 29, 1–33 (1988). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166364

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00166364

Navigation