Skip to main content
Log in

The argumentative impact of causal relations — An exemplary analysis of the free predicate in the promotional discourse

  • Published:
Argumentation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The semantic relations between and within utterances are marked by the use of connectors and adverbials. One type of semantic relations is causal relations expressed by causal markers such as because, therefore, so, for, etc. Some of these markers cover different types of causal relations such as causality, explanation and justification. In certain types of discourse, causal relations also imply an intentional element. This paper describes the way in which the semantic and pragmatic functions of causal markers can be accounted for in terms of linguistic and rhetorical theories of argumentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anscombre, J.-C.: 1984, lsLa représentation de la notion de cause dans langue’, Cashiers de grammaire no 8. Université de Toulouse-Le Mirail, 1–53.

  • Ducrot, O. and J.-C. Anscombre: 1983a, L'Argumentaions dans la langue, Piere Mardaga, Bruxelles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ducrot, O.: 1983b, ‘Puisque: Essai de description polyphonique’, Revue Romane no spécial 24. Université de Copenhague, 166–185.

  • Ducrot, O.: 1991, ‘Opérateurs argumentatifs et analyses de texte’, 21e congrès de la LSRL, Santa Barbara.

  • Lyons, J.: 1977, Semantics, Cambridge University Press.

  • Nielsen Ellerup, A. and H. Nølke: 1990, ‘Persuasion Disguised as Description. An Example of Argumentation in the Company Brochure’, Speech Acts: Fiction or Reality?. Proceedings of the International Conference, Ljubljana, Yugoslavia, 89–105.

  • Nielsen Ellerup, A.: 1994, ‘L'argumentation articulée par grâce à’, Actes du 12e congrès des Romanistes Scandinaves, Aalborg University Press, 2, 395–406.

  • Nølke, H.: 1983, ‘Les adverbes paradigmatisants: fonction et analyse’, Revue Romane, 23, numéro spécial, Romansk Institut, København.

  • Perelman, C. and L. Olbrechts-Tyteca: 1988, Traité de l'argumentation — la nouvelle rhétorique, 5. ed. Editions de l'Université de Bruxelles.

  • Plantin, C.: 1990, Essais sur l'argumentation — Introduction linguistique à l'étude de la parole argumentative, Edition Kimé, Paris.

  • Toulmin, S.: 1969, The uses of argument, Cambridge University Press [1st edn. 1958].

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nielsen, A.E. The argumentative impact of causal relations — An exemplary analysis of the free predicate in the promotional discourse . Argumentation 10, 329–345 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182199

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00182199

KEY WORDS

Navigation