What do numbers measure?: A new approach to fundamental measurement

https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4896(92)90063-BGet rights and content

Abstract

Unlike the standard representational theory of measurement, which takes the real numbers as a pregiven numerical domain, the approach presented in this paper is based on an abstract concept of a procedure of measurement, and ‘values of measurement’ are understood in terms of such procedures. The resulting ‘type approach’ makes use of elementary model-theoretic notions and emphasizes the constructibility of scales. It provides a natural starting point for a systematic discussion of issues that tend to be neglected in the standard framework (such as the relation between measurement and computation). At the same time it is perfectly compatible with the modern representational theory of measurement and helps elucidate a number of issues central to that theory (e.g. the role of Archimedean axioms).

References (39)

  • R. Dedekind
    (1969)
  • T.L. Health

    A History of Greek Mathematics

    (1921)
  • H. von Helmholtz

    Zählen und Messen erkenntnistheoretisch betrachtet

    Counting and Measuring

    (1930)
  • O. Hölder

    Die Axiome der Quantität und die Lehre vom Mass, Berichte über die Verhandlungen der Königlich Sächsischen Gesselschaft der Wissenschaften zu Leipzig

    Mathematisch-Physische Klasse

    (1901)
  • D. Krantz et al.

    Foundations of Measurement

  • F. Krull

    Über die Endomorphismen von total georneten Archimedischen Abelschen Halbgruppen

    Math. Z.

    (1960)
  • F. Krull

    Automorphismen und Spiegelungen eudoxischer Halbgruppen

    Math. Z.

    (1962)
  • R.D. Luce et al.

    Foundations of Measurement

  • R.D. Luce et al.

    Intrinsic Archimedeaness and the continuum

  • Cited by (12)

    • Beyond the metrological viewpoint

      2020, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A
      Citation Excerpt :

      Dissatisfaction has grown with its idealization of measurement procedures. One can find such dissatisfaction expressed throughout the history of RTM, sometimes even by direct contributors to this literature (e.g., Niederée, 1992, p. 854; Stevens, 1968, p. 245). But the most forceful expression has been recently inspired by the metrology community.

    • Measurement, Representational Theory of

      2015, International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences: Second Edition
    • The irony of measurement by subjective estimations

      2002, Journal of Mathematical Psychology
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text