Skip to main content
Log in

Truthlikeness misapplied: A reply to Ernest W. Adams

  • Published:
Synthese Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, E.: 1990, ‘Review Article onTruthlikeness’,Synthese 84, 139–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levi, I.: 1967,Gambling with Truth, Alfred A. Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullin, E.: 1987, ‘Review ofIs Science Progressive?’,Isis 78, 260–1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1984,Is Science Progressive?, D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niiniluoto, I.: 1987,Truthlikeness. D. Reidel, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearce, D.: 1989, ‘Review ofTruthlikeness’,The Journal of Symbolic Logic 54, 297–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. W.: 1985, ‘What is Wrong with Verisimilitude?’,Philosophy Research Archives 10, 511–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weston, T.: 1992, ‘Approximate Truth and Scientific Realism’,Philosophy of Science 59, 53–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niiniluoto, I. Truthlikeness misapplied: A reply to Ernest W. Adams. Synthese 101, 291–300 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064021

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01064021

Navigation