Skip to main content
Log in

An ABC-analysis of Ethical Organizational Behavior

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Antecedent-Behavior-Consequence (ABC)-analysis is a tool for analyzing behavior and stems from the field of psychology where it is used as a tool for the understanding of behavior in general and organizational behavior in particular. In this paper the ABC-analysis is implemented as a tool to understand why people behave ethically in organizations, through the identification of key environmental factors that cause such behavior. This analysis can be the first step to recognizing the complexity of circumstances determining ethical behavior, as well as trigger for changing that behavior. This will be elaborated in the implementation process of an ethical code. The working of the ABC-analysis will be illustrated with an example derived from field research concerning the reorganization of a department of a chemical company.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Badaracco, J. L. Jr.: 1992, ‘Business Ethics: Four Spheres of Executive Responsibility’, California Management Review (Spring), 64–79.

  • Brockner, J.: 1992, ‘Managing the Effects of Layoffs on Survivors’, California Management Review (Winter), 9–28.

  • Catania: 1992, 3rd ed., Learning (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, A. Y. S., R. B. Sawyer and P. F. Williams: 1997, ‘Reinforcing Ethical Decision Making Through Corporate Culture’, Jornal of Business Ethics 167, 855–865.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, A. C.: 1989, Performance Management (Performance Management Publications, Tucker (Georgia)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, A. C.: 1994, Bringing Out the Best in People (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, T. R. V. and F. Luthans: 1979, ‘Leadership Reexamined: A Behavioral Approach’, Academy of Management Review 4, 237–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisscher, O. A. M.: 1994, Kwaliteitsmanagment en bedrijfsethisch handelen, oratie aan de Universiteit Twente, 10 februari 1994.

  • French, P. A.: 1984, Collective and Corporate Responsibility (Columbia University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • George, R. T. de.: 1993, Competing with Integrity in International Business (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, L. and A. Evans: 1994, Principles of Behavior Analysis (HarperCollins, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J.: (1986), ‘The Distributive Justice of Organizational Performance Evaluations’, in Justice in Social Relations (Bierhoff, Cohen, Greenberg).

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, J.: 1993, ‘Stealing in the Name of Justice: Informational and Interpersonal Moderators of Theft Reactions to Underpayment Inequity’, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 54(1), 81–103.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, J. R. and C. D. Sutton: 1995, ‘Unravelling the Ethical Decision-Making Process: Clues from an Empirical Study Comparing Fortune 1000 Executives and MBA Students’, Journal of Business Ethics 14, 805–817.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekman, S. J.: 1995, Moral Voices, Moral Selves; Coral Gilligan and Feminist Moral Theory (Blackwell Publishers, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackal, R.: 1988, Moral Mazes; The World of Corporate Managers (Oxford University Press, Oxford).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jennings, M. M.: 1996, 2nd. Ed., Case Studies in Business Ethics (West Publishing, St. Paul).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, G. E. and M. J. Kavanagh: 1996, ‘An Experimental Examination of the Effects of Individual and Situational Factors on Unethical Behavioral Intentions in the Workplace’, Journal of Business Ethics 15(5) (May), 511–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaptein, S. P.: 1993, ‘De effectiviteit van ethische bedrijfscodes’, Bedrijfskunde, 186–195.

  • Kohlberg, L.: 1984, The Psychology of Moral Development (Harper and Row, San Francisco).

    Google Scholar 

  • Komaki, J. L.: 1986, ‘Toward Effective Supervision: An Operant Analysis and Comparison of Managers at Work’, Journal of Applied Psychology 71, 270–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, A.: 1981, After Virtue, A Study in Moral Theory, second edition (Notre Dame, IN).

  • March, J. G. and H. A. Simon: 1958, Organizations (Wiley, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan, R. B.: 1993, ‘Self-and Co-Worker Perceptions of Ethics and Their Relationships to Leadership and Salary’, Academy of Management Journal 36(1), 200–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, L.: 1981, ‘Ethics Without the Sermon’, Harvard Business Review (Nov.–Dec.), 79–90.

  • Nussbaum, M.: 1986, The Fragility of Goodness; Luck and Ethics in Greek Tragedy and Philosophy (C.U.P., Cambridge).

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J. R.: 1985, ‘An Interdisciplinary Approach to Moral Education’, in M. W. Berkowitz and F. Oser (eds.), Moral Education; Theory and Application (New Jersey).

  • Rutte, G. and D. M. Messick: 1995, ‘An Integrated Model of Perceived Unfairness in Organizations’, Social Justice Research 8(3).

  • Scott-Morgan, P.: 1994, The Unwritten Rules of the Game: Master Them, Shatter Them, and Break Through the Barriers to Organizational Change (McGraw-Hill, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: 1992, Inequality Reexamined, Russel Sage Foundation (Oxford University Press, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.: 1938, The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York).

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner, B. F.: 1966, ‘What is the Experimental Analysis of Behavior?’, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior 9, 213–218.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sulzer-Azaroff, B. and G. R. Mayer: 1991, Behavior Analysis for Lasting Change (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, London).

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L. K.: 1996, ‘Ethical Decision Making in Organizations: A Person-Situation Interactionist Model’, Academy of Management Review 11, 601–617.

    Google Scholar 

  • Velasquez, M. G.: 1988, 2nd. Ed., Business Ethics; Concepts and Cases (Prentice Hall, New Jersey).

    Google Scholar 

  • Victor, B. and J. B. Cullen: 1988, ‘The Organizational Bases of Ethical Work Climates’, Administrative Science Quarterly 33, 101–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyld, D. C. and C. A. Jones: 1997, ‘The Importance of Context: The Ethical Work Climate Construct and Models of Ethical Decision Making – An Agenda for Research’, Journal of Business Ethics 16, 465–472.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nijhof, A.H.J., Rietdijk, M.M. An ABC-analysis of Ethical Organizational Behavior. Journal of Business Ethics 20, 39–50 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005979101679

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1005979101679

Keywords

Navigation