Skip to main content
Log in

Online Auction Fraud: Ethical Perspective

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Internet fraud is an issue that increasingly concerns regulators, consumers, firms, and business ethics researchers. In this article, we examine one common form of internet fraud, the practice of shill bidding (when a seller in an auction enters a bid on his or her own item). The significant incidence of shill bidding on eBay (in spite of the fact that it is illegal just as it is in live auctions) exemplifies the current ineffectiveness of regulatory means as well as the lack of effective societal mechanisms to prevent online fraud. Further, the proliferation of shill bidding along with other types of internet fraud may have broader implications. If unethical behavior such as shill bidding becomes too widespread on the internet, regulators and other societal forces may deem it necessary to institute controls that will impact the entire online marketplace as well as the future development and regulation of business activities on the internet. Our results indicate that shill bidding is perpetrated on eBay significantly more often than 0.1% rate of fraud estimated by the firm. This suggests that regulators, users, and others stakeholders may become concerned enough to act. The impact of those responses on the internet of the future may affect a broad array of users beyond the unethical sellers on eBay.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  • Bensinger, K.: 2000, ‚EBay Seller used Aliases, Submitted Phony Bids at Site’, Wall Street Journal, May 18, 1

  • Bush V. D., Venable B. T., Bush A. J. (2000) Ethics and Marketing on the Internet: Practitioners’ Perceptions of Societal, Industry and Company Concerns. Journal of Business Ethics 23:237–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakraborty I., Kosmopoulou G. (2004) Auctions with Shill Bidding. Economic Theory 24:271–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrzynski, J. H.: 2000, ‚E-Bay Fraud: In Online Auctions, Rings of Bidders’, New York Times, June 6

  • Enos, L.: 2001, ‚Two Men Plead Guilty to eBay Art Scam’, E-Commerce Times, April 18

  • Freestone O., Mitchell V. - W. (2004) Generation Y Attitudes Towards E-ethics and Internet-related Misbehaviours. Journal of Business Ethics 54:121–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gomes, L.: 2000, ‚EBay’s Earnings Beat Forecasts as Sales, Number of Users Surge’, Wall Street Journal, July 26, B.6

  • Hanford D. J. (2005) Fraud Fears Slow Online Shopping. Wall Street Journal, 13:1

    Google Scholar 

  • Koehn D. (2003) The Nature of and Conditions for Online Trust. Journal of Business Ethics 43:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langford D. (2000) Introduction and Overview. In: Langford D. (ed.) Internet Ethics. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY pp. 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Mawhood J., Tysver D. (2000) Law and the Internet. In: Langford D. (ed.) Internet Ethics. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY pp. 96–126

    Google Scholar 

  • McPhail K. (2001) The Other Objective of Ethics Education: Re-humanising the Accounting Profession – A Study of Ethics Education in Law, Engineering, Medicine and Accountancy. Journal of Business Ethics 34:279–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPhail K. (2004) An Emotional Response to the State of Accounting Education: Developing Accounting Students’ Emotional Intelligence. Critical Perspectives in Accounting 15:629–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menestrel M. L., Hunter M., de Bettignies H. -C. (2002) Internet E-ethics in Confrontation with Activists’ Agenda: Yahoo! on Trial. Journal of Business Ethics 39:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National White Collar Crime Center: 2003, ‚IFCC 2002 Internet Fraud Report’

  • Nikitkov, A. and D.N. Stone, ‚Towards a Model of Online Auction Deception’, Working paper 2006

  • Noreen , E.: 1988, ‚The Economics of Ethics: A New Perspective on Agency Theory’, 13(4), 359–370

  • Palmer D. E. (2005) Pop-Ups, Cookies, and Spam: Toward a Deeper Analysis of the Ethical Significance of Internet Marketing Practices. Journal of Business Ethics 58:271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pesola, M.: 2005, ‚Vietnam, Romania and US Top Internet Fraud List’, Financial Times, March 1, 11

  • Rosen C. M., Carr G. M. (1997) Fares and Free Riders on the Information Highway. Journal of Business Ethics 16:1439–1445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shearer T. (2002) Ethics and Accountability: from the For-itself to the For-the-other. Accounting, Organizations and Society 27:541–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spinello R. A. (2006) CyberEthics: Morality and Law in Cyberspace. 3rd edn. Jones and Bartlett Publishers Canada, Mississauga, Ontario

    Google Scholar 

  • Stead B. A., Gilbert J. (2001) Ethical Issues in Electronic Commerce. Journal of Business Ethics 34:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van den Hoven J. (2000) The Internet and Varieties of Moral Wrongdoing. In: Langford D. (ed.) Internet Ethics. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY pp. 127–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Waldmeir, P.: 2001, ‚User Police Get Tough: Citizens are Increasingly Being Called on to Act as Vigilantes to Patrol the Online World’, Financial Times, July 19, 15

  • Weckert J. (2000) What is New or Unique about Internet Activities? In: Langford D. (ed) Internet Ethics. St. Martin’s Press, New York, NY, pp. 47–64

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darlene Bay.

Additional information

Alex Nikitkov is an Assistant Professor of Accounting at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Darlene Bay is an Assistant Professor of Accounting at Brock University in St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nikitkov, A., Bay, D. Online Auction Fraud: Ethical Perspective. J Bus Ethics 79, 235–244 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9374-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9374-8

Keywords

Navigation