Skip to main content
Log in

Power and Size of Firms as Reflected in Cleaning Subcontractors’ Practices of Social Responsibility

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent discussions in the area of corporate social responsibility suggest that organizational size has complex meanings and thus requires more scholarly attention. This article explores organizational size in the context of relative power in inter-organizational networks. To shed light on the ways relative power interacts with size we studied social responsibility practices among cleaning subcontractors in three firms of different sizes. Our focus on the network differentiates these firms on the basis of their size and sector. Semi-structured interviews were used to trace cleaning subcontractors’ CSR-related practices. We analyzed subjective reports and discursive practices involved in subcontractors’ self-presentations. While the economic and philanthropic dimensions of social responsibility were presented by the cleaning subcontractors as independent of network constraints, the findings show that the legal and ethical dimensions were subject to large client–firm pressures. What we learn from our data is that the four dimensions of Carroll’s model, the economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic, should all develop from and be evaluated against a fifth root dimension of inter-personal commitment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baron J., F. Dobbin, P. Jennings 1986, War and Peace: the Evolution of Modern Personnel Administration in US Industry, American Journal of Sociology, 92(2), 350–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Besser T. L., N. J. Miller 2004, The Risk of Enlightened Self-Interest: Small Businesses and Support for Community, Business and Society, 43(4), 398–425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A 1979, A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Social Performance. Boston, Little Brown

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A. B. 1991, The Pyramid of Corporate Social Responsibility: Toward the Moral Management of Organizational Stakeholders, Business Horizon, 34, 39–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll A. B. 1994, Social Issues in Management Research: Experts’ Views, Analysis and Commentary, Business and Society, 33, 5–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Bekker F. G. A., P. Groenewegen, F. Den Hond 2005, A Bibliometric Analysis of 30 Years of Research on Corporate Social Responsibility and Corporate Social Performance, Business and Society, 44(3), 283–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission: 2003, Responsible Entrepreneurship. A Collection of Good Practice Cases Among Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises Across Europe, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

  • Garriga E., D. Mele 2004, Corporate Social Responsibility Theories: Mapping the Territory, Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1–2), 51–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon N. 2003, Strategic Violations: The Outsourcing of Human Rights Abuses, The Humanist, 63(5), 10–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Graafland J. J. 2003, Distribution of Responsibility, Ability and Competition, Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimshaw D., H. Willmott, J. Rubbery 2005, Inter-organizational Networks: Trust, Power and the Employment Relationship, in M. Marchington, D. Grimshaw, H. Willmott, J. Rubbery (eds.), Fragmenting Work; Blurring Organizational Boundaries and Disordering Hierarchies, Oxford: Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison B. 1994, Lean and Mean: Why Large Corporations will Continue to Dominate the Global Economy, London: The Guilford Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillary, R.: 2000, ‹Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises and the Environment’, Greenleaf, Sheffield, U.K

  • Humphreys, N., D. P. Robin, R. E. Reidenbach and D. L. Moak: 1993, ‹The Ethical Decision Making Process of Small Business Owner/Managers and Their Customer’, Journal of Small Business Management 31(3), 9–22

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins H. 2006, Small Business Champions for Corporate Social Responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 241–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepoutre J., A. Heene 2006, Investigating the Impact of Firm Size on Small Business Social Responsibility: A Critical Review, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 257–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker J. G., J. A. Mckinney, C. W. Moore: 1989, Ethics in Small Business, Journal of Small Business Management, 27(1), 27–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Longenecker J. G., C. W. Moore, J.W. Petty, L. E. William Palich, J. A. McKinney 2006, Ethical Attitudes in Small Business and Large Corporations: Theory and Empirical Findings from a Tracking Study Spanning Three Decades, Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 167–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matten D., A. Crane, W. Chapple 2003, Behind the Mask: Reveling the True Face of Corporate Citizenship, Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1), 109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto R., J. Ash, C. Hope 2005, Corporate Social Responsibility Audit: From Theory to Practice, Journal of Business Ethics, 62(4), 315–325

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrini F. 2006, SMEs and CSR Theory: Evidence and Implications from an Italian Perspective, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(3), 305–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quinn J. 1997, Personal Ethics and Business Ethics: The Ethical Attitudes of Owner/Managers of Small Business, Journal of Business Ethics, 16(2), 119–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Serwinek P. 1992, Demographic and Related Differences in Ethical Views among Small Business, Journal of Business Ethics, 11(7), 555–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir, R.: 2002, The Commodification of Corporate Social Responsibility: An Israeli Test Case (The Pinhas Sapir center for Development, Tel-Aviv University, Tel-Aviv)

  • Spence L. J. 1999, Dose Size Matter? The State of the Art in Small Business Ethics, Business Ethics: A European Review, 8(3), 163–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spence L. J., R. Rutherfoord 2003, Small Business and Empirical Perspectives in Business Ethics: Editorial, Journal of Business Ethics, 47(1), 1–5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser, W.: 2006, ‹Revisiting Carroll’s CSR Pyramid: An African Perspective’, in M. Huniche and E. R. Pedersen (eds.), Corporate Citizenship in Developing Countries: New Partnership Perspective (Copenhagen Business Scholl Press)

  • Vyakarnam S., A. Bailey, A. Myers, D. Burnett 1997, Towards an Understanding of Ethical Behavior in Small Firms Journal of Business Ethics, 16(15), 1625–1636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Warren C. A. B. 2002, Qualitative Interviewing, in J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein (eds.), Handbook of Interview Research: Context and Methods, Thousand Oaks: Sage publication Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Werther W.B., D. Chandler, 2006, Strategic Corporate Social Responsibility: Stakeholders in a Global Environment. California: Sage Publications, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson E. 1980, Social Responsibility of Business: What are the Small Business Perspectives?, Journal of Small Business Management, 18(3), 17–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Worthington I., R. Monder, J. Trevor 2006, Exploring Corporate Social Responsibility in the U.K. Asian Small Business Community, Journal of Business Ethics, 67(2), 201–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the Israeli Science Foundation for funding this research.

We also wish to express our gratitude to Ron Grabarsky for his devoted support and useful insights. Our gratitude, as well, goes to our anonymous reviewers for helpful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Orly Benjamin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nisim, S., Benjamin, O. Power and Size of Firms as Reflected in Cleaning Subcontractors’ Practices of Social Responsibility. J Bus Ethics 83, 673–683 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9647-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9647-2

Keywords

Navigation