Skip to main content
Log in

Margulis' Theory on Division of Labour in Cells Revisited

  • Published:
Acta Biotheoretica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Division of labour is a marked feature of multicellular organisms. Margulis proposed that the ancestors of metazoans had only one microtubule organizing center (MTOC), so they could not move and divide simultaneously. Selection for simultaneous movement and cell division had driven the division of labour between cells. However, no evidence or explanation for this assumption was provided. Why could the unicellular ancetors not have multiple MTOCs? The gain and loss of three possible strategies are discussed. It was found that the advantage of one or two MTOC per cell is environment-dependent. Unicellular organisms with only one MTOC per cell are favored only in resource-limited environments without strong predatory pressure. If division of labour occurring in a bicellular organism just makes simultaneous movement and cell division possible, the possibility of its fixation by natural selection is very low because a somatic cell performing the function of an MTOC is obviously wasting resources. Evolutionary biologists should search for other selective forces for division of labour in cells.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Barford, J. P. and R. J. Hall (1976). Estimation of the length of cell cycle phases from asynchronous cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Experimental Cell Research 102: 276-284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, G. (1989). Darwin and Biology. Journal of Heredity 80: 417-421.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, L. W. (1987). The Evolution of Individuality. Princeton University Press, Princeton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clowes, F. A. L. (1965). The duration of the G1 phase of the mitotic cycle and its relation to radiosensitivity. New Phytologists 64: 355-359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornell, R. B. and A. F. Horwitz (1980). Apparent coordination of the biosynthesis of lipids in cultured cells: Its relationship to the regulation of the membrane sterol:phospholipid ratio and cell cycling. Journal of Cell Biology 86: 810-819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darnell, J., H. Lodish and D. Baltimore (1990). Molecular Cell Biology (Second edition). Scientific American Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gerhart, J. and M. Kirschner (1997). Cells, Embryos, and Evolution: towards a cellular and developmental understanding of phenotypic variation and evolutionary adaptability. Blackwell Science, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guiguet, M., J.-J. Kupiec and A.-J. Valleron (1984). A systematic study of the variability of cell cycle phase durations in experimental mammalian systems. In: L.N. Edmunds Jr. (ed.), Cell Cycle Clock, pp. 97-111. Marcel Dekker, Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E. and M. J. Lamb (1995). Epigenetic Inheritance and Evolution: The Lamarckian Dimension. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerszberg, M. and L. Wolpert (1998). The origin of metazoa and the egg: a role for cell death. Journal of Theoretical Biology 193: 535-537.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirk, D. L. (1998). Volvox: Molecular-Genetic Origin of Multicellularity and Cell Differentiation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koufopanou, V. (1994). The evolution of soma in the Volvocales. The American Naturalist 143: 907-931.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margulis, L. (1981). Symbiosis and Cell Evolution. Freeman, San Francisco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J. and E. Szathmáry (1995). The Major Transitions in Evolution. W. H. Freeman, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nesse, R. M. and G. C. Williams (1994). Why We Get Sick: The New Science of Darwinian Medicine. Times Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu, D. K. and J.-K. Chen (1997). Evolutionary advantages of cell specialization: Save and protect DNA. Journal of Theoretical Biology 187: 39-43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nygaard, O. F.; S. Guttes and H. P. Rusch (1960). Nucleic acid metabolic in a slime old with synchronous mitosis. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta 38: 298-306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pardee, A. B.; R. Dubrow, J. L. Hamlin and R. F. Kletzien (1978). Animal cell cycle. Annual Review of Biochemistry 47: 715-750.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, E.; and M. D. Scharff (1967). The absence of a detectable G1 phase in a cultured strain of Chinese hamster lung cell. Journal of Cell Biology. 34: 684-686.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuster, P. (1996). How does complexity arise in evolution: Nature's recipe for mastering scarcity, abundance, and unpredictability? Complexity 2: 22-30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szathmáry E. and Maynard Smith, J. (1995). The major evolutionary transitions. Nature 374: 227-232.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Niu, D.K., Chen, JK. & Liu, YD. Margulis' Theory on Division of Labour in Cells Revisited. Acta Biotheor 49, 23–28 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010277405954

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010277405954

Keywords

Navigation