Skip to main content
Log in

Recombination unbound

  • Published:
Philosophical Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Conclusion

The realisation that Forrest/Armstrong style cardinality arguments are not successful allowsus to have a simpler and more intuitive principle of recombination, and dispenses with the need to postulate mysterious necessities in order to guarantee a maximum size of worlds. As we have seen, examining the options for possibilia to form a proper class also raises new issues to do with the connection of possible worlds and classes, and may provide the motivation for various theoretical commitments that seemed previously to have no application outside pure mathematics (Should any proper classes have singletons? Should the individuals form a set?). While this essay has proceeded as a discussion primarily of Lewis' theory, it can be more generally applied — any theory of possible worlds that would wish to endorse something like the unrestricted principle of recombination and wishes to be able to talk about possibilia from more than one world simultaneously will need a modal class theory where the possibilia form a proper class rather than a set, for example. Nearly every theory of possible worlds can, and in my opinion should, take advantage of the unrestricted principle of recombination rather than limit the size of possible worlds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bernays, P. (1937–1954): “A System of Axiomatic Set Theory”, in G. Muller (ed.), (1976) Sets and Classes, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forrest, P. and Armstrong, D.M. (1984): “An Argument Against David Lewis' Theory of Possible Worlds”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, pp. 164–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goedel, K. (1940): The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalised Continuum-Hypothesis with the Axioms of Set Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986b): “Against Structural Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, pp. 25–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1983): “New Work for a Theory of Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, pp. 343–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1986): On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, D. (1991): Parts of Classes (Appendix by Burgess, Hazen and Lewis), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nolan, D. Recombination unbound. Philosophical Studies 84, 239–262 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354489

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354489

Keywords

Navigation