Conclusion
The realisation that Forrest/Armstrong style cardinality arguments are not successful allowsus to have a simpler and more intuitive principle of recombination, and dispenses with the need to postulate mysterious necessities in order to guarantee a maximum size of worlds. As we have seen, examining the options for possibilia to form a proper class also raises new issues to do with the connection of possible worlds and classes, and may provide the motivation for various theoretical commitments that seemed previously to have no application outside pure mathematics (Should any proper classes have singletons? Should the individuals form a set?). While this essay has proceeded as a discussion primarily of Lewis' theory, it can be more generally applied — any theory of possible worlds that would wish to endorse something like the unrestricted principle of recombination and wishes to be able to talk about possibilia from more than one world simultaneously will need a modal class theory where the possibilia form a proper class rather than a set, for example. Nearly every theory of possible worlds can, and in my opinion should, take advantage of the unrestricted principle of recombination rather than limit the size of possible worlds.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bernays, P. (1937–1954): “A System of Axiomatic Set Theory”, in G. Muller (ed.), (1976) Sets and Classes, Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.
Forrest, P. and Armstrong, D.M. (1984): “An Argument Against David Lewis' Theory of Possible Worlds”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62, pp. 164–168.
Goedel, K. (1940): The Consistency of the Axiom of Choice and of the Generalised Continuum-Hypothesis with the Axioms of Set Theory, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Lewis, D. (1986b): “Against Structural Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 64, pp. 25–46.
Lewis, D. (1983): “New Work for a Theory of Universals”, Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61, pp. 343–377.
Lewis, D. (1986): On the Plurality of Worlds, Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Lewis, D. (1991): Parts of Classes (Appendix by Burgess, Hazen and Lewis), Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nolan, D. Recombination unbound. Philosophical Studies 84, 239–262 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354489
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00354489