Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Modernization, Rights, and Democratic Society: The Limits of Habermas’s Democratic Theory

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Jürgen Habermas’s discourse-theoretic reconstruction of the normative foundations of democracy assumes the formal separation of democratic political practice from the economic system. Democratic autonomy presupposes a vital public sphere protected by a complex schedule of individual rights. These rights are supposed to secure the formal and material conditions for democratic freedom. However, because Habermas argues that the economy must be left to function according to endogenous market dynamics, he accepts as a condition of democracy (the formal separation of spheres) a social structure that is in fact anti-democratic. The value of self-determination that Habermas’s theory of democracy presupposes is contradicted by the actual operations of capitalist markets. Further democratic development demands that the steering mechanisms of the capitalist market be challenged by self-organizing civic movements.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jeff Noonan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noonan, J. Modernization, Rights, and Democratic Society: The Limits of Habermas’s Democratic Theory. Res Publica 11, 101–123 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-1478-3

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11158-005-1478-3

Keywords

Navigation