Skip to main content
Log in

Criteria of Justice: Desert, Needs and Equality

  • Published:
Res Publica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The conception of social justice as equality is defended in this paper by examining what may appear to be two inegalitarian conceptions of justice, as distribution according to desert and as distribution according to need. It is argued that claims of just entitlement arise within a context of reciprocal co-operation for mutual benefit. Within such a context there are special cases where it can be said that those who contribute more deserve more, and that those who need more should get more, but those claims themselves presuppose a norm of equal contribution and equal benefit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Norman, R. Criteria of Justice: Desert, Needs and Equality. Res Publica 7, 115–136 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011926403555

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011926403555

Navigation