Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-t5pn6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-23T08:03:01.565Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Two Views on Time Reversal

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2022

Jill North
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In a recent paper, Malament (2004) employs a time reversal transformation that differs from the standard one, without explicitly arguing for it. This is a new and important understanding of time reversal that deserves arguing for in its own right. I argue that it improves upon the standard one. Recent discussion has focused on whether velocities should undergo a time reversal operation. I address a prior question: What is the proper notion of time reversal? This is important, for it will affect our conclusion as to whether our best theories are time-reversal symmetric, and hence whether our spacetime is temporally oriented.

Type
Research Article
Information
Philosophy of Science , Volume 75 , Issue 2 , April 2008 , pp. 201 - 223
Copyright
Copyright © The Philosophy of Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

‡

For comments and discussion, I am indebted to Frank Arntzenius, Hartry Field, Stephen Leeds, David Malament, Ted Sider, students in seminars at NYU and Yale, audience members at the Pacific APA in 2006, and an anonymous referee for this journal.

References

REFERENCES

Albert, David Z (2000), Time and Chance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Arntzenius, Frank (1995), “Indeterminism and the Direction of Time”, Indeterminism and the Direction of Time 14:67–81.Google Scholar
Arntzenius, Frank (1997), “Mirrors and the Direction of Time”, Philosophy of Science (Proceedings) 64:S213–S222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arntzenius, Frank (2004), “Time Reversal Operations, Representations of the Lorentz Group, and the Direction of Time”, Time Reversal Operations, Representations of the Lorentz Group, and the Direction of Time 35:31–43.Google Scholar
Arntzenius, Frank (2005), “Are Anti-particles Just Particles Traveling Back in Time?”. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Arntzenius, Frank, and Greaves, Hilary (2007), “Time Reversal in Classical Electromagnetism”. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Callender, Craig (2000), “Is Time ‘Handed’ in a Quantum World?”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society: 247–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Earman, John (2002), “What Time Reversal Invariance Is and Why It Matters”, What Time Reversal Invariance Is and Why It Matters 16:245–264.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul (1987), Asymmetries in Time: Problems in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Leeds, Stephen (2006), “Discussion: Malament on Time Reversal”, Discussion: Malament on Time Reversal 73:448–458.Google Scholar
Malament, David (2004), “On the Time Reversal Invariance of Classical Electromagnetic Theory”, On the Time Reversal Invariance of Classical Electromagnetic Theory 35:295–315.Google Scholar
Maudlin, Tim (1994), Quantum Non-locality and Relativity: Metaphysical Intimations of Modern Physics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maudlin, Tim (2006), “Relativity”, in Borchert, Donald M. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Detroit: Thompson Gale.Google Scholar
Maudlin, Tim (2007), “On the Passing of Time”, in The Metaphysics within Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 104–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
North, Jill (2008), “The ‘Structure’ of Physics: A Case Study”. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Price, Huw (1996), Time's Arrow and Archimedes’ Point: New Directions for the Physics of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Savitt, Steven (1996), “The Direction of Time”, The Direction of Time 47:347–370.Google Scholar