Skip to main content
Log in

The Web-Rhetoric of Companies Offering Home-Based Personal Health Monitoring

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Health Care Analysis Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper I investigate the web-rhetoric of companies offering home-based personal health monitoring to patients and elderly people. Two main rhetorical methods are found, namely a reference to practical benefits and a use of prestige words like “quality of life” and “independence”. I interpret the practical benefits in terms of instrumental values and the prestige words in terms of final values. I also reconstruct the arguments on the websites in terms of six different types of argument. Finally, I articulate a general critique of the arguments, namely that the websites neglect the context of use of personal health monitoring technologies. Whether or not a technology is good depends on the use of the technology by a particular individual in a particular context. The technology is not good–or bad–in itself. I support this critique with a number of more specific arguments such as the risk for reduced personal contact. For some elderly people social contact with care providers is more valuable than the independent living made possible by remote monitoring, for others independence is more important.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ADT. (2011). www.adt.com/for_your_home/products_services/home_health_security?wgc=emergency_medical_alert_systems. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  2. Aerotel. (2011). www.aerotel.com/en/news/press-releases/aerotel-and-t-care-sign-agreement-for-portugal.html. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  3. Berlin, I. (1966). Two concepts of liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. BodyTel. (2011). www.bodytel.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  5. Bosch. (2011a). Telehealth Better quality of life through better care. www.bosch-presse.de/presseforum/details.htm?txtID=4465&locale=en. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  6. Bosch. (2011b). Notice of privacy practices–for protected health information. www.bosch-telehealth.com/content/language1/html/6207_ENU_XHTML.aspx. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  7. Choose Independence. (2011). www.chooseindependence.co.uk/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  8. Collste, G. (2011). Under my skin: The ethics of ambient computing for personal health monitoring. In S. Nagy Hesse-Biber (Ed.), The handbook of emergent technologies in social research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Connections 365. (2011). www.connections365.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  10. Decker, M. (2008). Caregiving robots and ethical reflection: The perspective of interdiscipinary technology assessment. AI & Society, 22, 315–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Delnor. (2011). www.delnor.com/body.cfm?id=761. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  12. Free Patents Online. (2011). www.freepatentsonline.com/y2008/0077028.html. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  13. Gecko Systems. (2011). www.geckosystems.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  14. GrandCare. (2011). www.grandcare.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  15. Healthium (Telehealth Broadband LLC AT Security). (2011). www.atsecurity.net/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  16. Honeywell, H. (2011). www.hommed.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  17. Koff, P. B., Jones, R. H., Cashman, J. M., Voelkel, N. F., & Vandivier, R. W. (2009). Proactive integrated care improves quality of life in patients with COPD. European Respiratory Journal, 33, 1031–1038.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kuokkannen, L., & Leino-Kilpi, H. (2000). Power and empowerment in nursing: Three theoretical approaches. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 31(1), 235–241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Korsgaard, C. (1983). Two distinctions in goodness. Philosophical Review, 92, 169–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin, M. W., & Schinzinger, R. (2005). Ethics in engineering (4th ed.). Boston: MacGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Myglucohealth. (2011). http://myglucohealth.net/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  22. Nissenbaum, H. (2004). Privacy as contextual integrity. Washington Law Review, 79(1), 119–158.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nordenfelt, L. (Ed.). (1994). Concepts and measurement of quality of life in health care. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Nordenfelt, L. (1995). On the nature of health: An action-theoretic approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Palm, E. (2010). När vården flyttar hem till dig–den mobila vården teknik. Etikk i praksis. Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics, 4(2), 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  26. Personal Health Monitor. (2011). www.personalhealthmonitor.net/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  27. Philips (2011). www.newscenter.philips.com/main/standard/news/press/2010/20100531_telehealth.wpd.

  28. Reuzel, R. P. (2003). Interactive technology assessment of paediatric cochlear implantation. Poiesis & Praxis: International Journal of Technology Assessment and Ethics of Science, 2(2–3), 119–137.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Robotdalen. (2011a). Hälsorobotik. www.robotdalen.se/Om-Robotdalen/Vara-karnomraden/Halsorobotik/.

  30. Robotdalen. (2011b). Giraff–a way to stay connected. www.robotdalen.se/sv/English/News/2010/Giraff—a-way-to-stay-connected.

  31. Rössler, B. (2005). The value of privacy. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Senior Friend Home Care. (2011). www.seniorfriendinc.com/homed.htm. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  33. Senior Telehealth. (2011). www.seniortelehealth.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  34. Sentara. (2011). www.sentara.com/News/NewsArchives/2010/Pages/Telehealth-Program-Health-Care.aspx. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  35. Sharkey, A., & Sharkey, N. (2010) (online). Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for elderly. Ethics and Information Technology.

  36. Siemens. (2011). www.siemens.com/innovation/en/publikationen/publications_pof/pof_spring_2007/livable_megacities/telemedicine.htm. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  37. S3 Group. (2011). www.s3group.com/telehealth/health-gateway/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  38. Tavani, H. T. (2007). Philosophical theories of privacy: Implications for an adequate online privacy policy. Metaphilosophy, 38(1), 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Televital. (2011). www.televital.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  40. Tengland, P. A. (2007). Enpowerment: A goal or a means for health promotion? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10, 197–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. The Thorne Group. (2011). www.thethornegroup.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  42. Tunstall. (2011). www.tunstall.co.uk/Home/Telehealth-Zone.

  43. Van Dongen Research. (2011). www.vdresearch.com/. Accessed January 24, 2011.

  44. VNA Care Network. (2011). www.vnacarenetwork.org/news/telehealth.html. Accessed January 24, 2011.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is written within the project Personalized Health Monitoring Ethics (PHM-Ethics) funded by the European Commission (contract number 230602). I am in particular grateful for valuable input by Elin Palm, Göran Collste and Cornelis Dekker.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anders Nordgren.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Nordgren, A. The Web-Rhetoric of Companies Offering Home-Based Personal Health Monitoring. Health Care Anal 20, 103–118 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0174-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-011-0174-z

Keywords

Navigation