| Record number | 599647 |
|---|---|
| Title | Recommendations for the development of a competitive advantage based on RRI |
| Author(s) | Novelskaitė, Aurelija; Antier, Clémentine; Pučėtaitė, Raminta; Adams, Andrew; Wakunuma, Kutoma; Jiya, Tilimbe; Grabner, Louisa; Lorenz, Lars; Sánchez de Madariaga, Inés; Novella, Inés; Blok, Vincent; Inigo, Edurne A. |
| Source | Place not identified : PRING - 49 |
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4972690 |
| Department(s) |
Philosophy WASS |
| Publication type | Research report |
| Publication year | 2021 |
| Abstract | This report analyses the relationship between RRI-like practices and competitive advantage. RRI frameworks have traditionally been less oriented towards their application in competitive environments; hence resulting in limitations to the applicability of some of its main tenets in industry and in the context of the development of a national competitive advantage. Aiming to close this gap and identify how a competitive advantage based on engagement in RRI-like practices across world regions may be developed, a systematic literature review, a survey and case studies were carried out. Five main drivers of competitive advantage through RRI-like practices were identified: avoiding uncompetitive regulation, increasing social acceptance, incorporating stakeholder needs and tapping into new markets, increasing the efficiency of the innovation process, and reputational effects. On the other hand, four barriers were identified: obstacles during the research and innovation process (such as lengthening the time-to-market), protecting intellectual property, lack of consumer awareness, and barriers derived from the institutional environment. The survey revealed that, while there are some differences in terms of attitudes and engagement in RRI-like practices across regions, both procedural and outcome dimensions were relevant. However, the application of particular practices in exercising such dimensions showed more variations across regions, reflecting adaption to local environments. In relation to competitive advantage, outcome dimensions and open and transparent innovation processes showed a clear relationship with performance, in particular with customer performance. The reason for this might lie in the increased visibility of such practices to the consumer. Two cases studies were carried out focusing on the management of socio-ethical concerns through RRI-like practices and their relationship with competitive advantage. The case on the bio-economy domain (on GMOs and gene-editing techniques), identified different responses depending on local regulations and the focus placed on the development of competitive advantages at the micro and macro levels, and showcased the importance of domain specific considerations in RRI-like responses. The ICT case (focused on biometrics and deep learning) highlighted the importance of network approaches and second-order reflexivity, and the need to adapt RRI-like practices to local contexts to maximise their benefits for competitive advantage. Lastly, the analysis of the two cases concentrating on transversal issues (gender equality and diversity) made notable how strategic approaches to RRI and their proper integration in strategy showed an improved relation with competitive advantage. This study makes a significant contribution to existing research on RRI-like practices and competitive advantage and adds to the literature on business involvement in RRI that has been flourishing despite the tradition of overlooking RRI by actors in competitive environments. Moreover, it provides a set of practical recommendations for industry, policymakers, research performing organizations, research funding organizations, investors, civil society and NGOs and association bodies. These recommendations are oriented towards developing and sustaining a competitive advantage based on RRI-like practices by research and innovation actors, while supported by other stakeholders in the system. The advice is informed by the research study and proposes the need to tailor and adopt bottom-up approaches in the implementation of RRI-practices, integrating RRI-like logics and competitive advantage logics into organizational dynamic, and the need for collaboration among different actors, apart from recommendations particular to each stakeholder. |
Staff Publications
Staff Publications
- external user (warning
) -
Log in as
-
About
'Staff publications' is the digital repository of Wageningen University & Research
'Staff publications' contains references to publications authored by Wageningen University staff from 1976 onward.
Publications authored by the staff of the Research Institutes are available from 1995 onwards.
Full text documents are added when available. The database is updated daily and currently holds about 240,000 items, of which 72,000 in open access.
We have a manual that explains all the features