Abstract
Theories of verisimilitude have routinely been classified into two rival camps—the content approach and the likeness approach—and these appear to be motivated by very different sets of data and principles. The question thus naturally arises as to whether these approaches can be fruitfully combined. Recently Zwart and Franssen (Synthese 158(1):75–92, 2007) have offered precise analyses of the content and likeness approaches, and shown that given these analyses any attempt to meld content and likeness orderings violates some basic desiderata. Unfortunately their characterizations of the approaches do not embrace the paradigm examples of those approaches. I offer somewhat different characterizations of these two approaches, as well as of the consequence approach (Schurz and Weingartner (Synthese 172(3):415–436, 2010) which happily embrace their respective paradigms. Finally I prove that the three approaches are indeed compatible, but only just, and that the cost of combining them is too high. Any account which combines the strictures of what I call the strong likeness approach with the demands of either the content or the consequence approach suffers from precisely the same defect as Popper’s—namely, it entails the trivialization of truthlikeness. The downside of eschewing the strong likeness constraints and embracing the content constraints alone is the underdetermination of the concept of truthlikeness.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hilpinen R. et al (1976) Approximate truth and truthlikeness. In: Przelecki M. (eds) Formal methods in the methodology of the empirical sciences. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 19–42
Kieseppä I. (1996) Truthlikess for multidimensional, quantitative cognitive problems. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Kuipers, T. (1987). A structuralist approach to truthlikeness. In T. Kuipers What is closer-to-the-truth? A parade of approaches to truthlikeness. Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities (Vol. 10, pp. 79–99). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
Miller D. (1974) Popper’s qualitative theory of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 166–177
Miller D. et al (1978) On distance from the truth as a true distance. In: Hintikka J. (eds) Essays on mathematical and philosophical logic. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 415–435
Miller D. (2006) Out of error: Further essays on critical rationalism. Ashgate, Aldershot
Mortensen C. (1983) Relevance and verisimilitude. Synthese 55(6): 353–365
Mormann, T. (2005). Geometry of logic and truth approximation. In R. Festa, et al. (Eds.) Poznan studies in the philosophy of the sciences and the humanities: Confirmation, empirical progress and truth approximation (Vol. 83, no. 1, pp. 431–454). Amsterdam: Gruener
Mormann, T. (2006). Truthlikeness for theories on countable languages. In I. Jarvie, et al. (Eds.), Karl Popper: A centenary assessment. Volume III: Science (pp. 3–15). Aldershot: Ashgate.
Niiniluoto I. et al (1977) On the truthlikeness of generalizations. In: Butts R. E. (eds) Basic problems in methodology and linguistics. Reidel, Dordrecht, pp 121–147
Niiniluoto I. (1987) Truthlikeness. Reidel, Dordrecht
Niiniluoto I. et al (2003) Content and likeness definitions of verisimilitude. In: Hintikka J. (eds) Philosophy and logic: In search of the polish tradition. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 27–36
Oddie G. (1978) Verisimilitude and distance in logical space. Acta Philosophica Fennica 30(2–4): 227–243
Oddie G. (1986) Likeness to truth. Reidel, Dordrecht
Oddie G., Milne P. (1991) Act and value: Expectations and the representability of moral theories. Theoria 48: 165–182
Popper K. R. (1963) Conjectures and refutations. Routledge, London
Popper K. R. (1976) A note on verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27(2): 147–159
Schurz G., Weingartner P. (1987) Verisimilitude defined by relevant consequence-elements. In: Kuipers T. A. (eds) What is closer-to-the-truth?. Rodopi, Amsterdam, pp 47–78
Schurz G., Weingartner P. (2010) Zwart and Franssen’s impossibility theorem holds for possible-world-accounts but not for consequence-accounts to verisimilitude. Synthese 172(3): 415–436
Teller P. (2001) The twilight of the perfect model model. Erkenntnis 55(3): 393–415
Tichý P. (1974) On Popper’s definitions of verisimilitude. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25: 155–160
Tichý P. (1976) Verisimilitude redefined. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 27: 25–42
Tichý P. (1978) Verisimilitude revisited. Synthese 38: 175–196
Tuomela R. (1978) Verisimilitude and theory distance. Synthese 38: 213–246
Weston T. (1990) Approximate truth and scientific realism. Philosophy of Science 59: 53–74
Zwart S. D. (2001) Refined verisimilitude. Kluwer, Dordrecht
Zwart S. D., Franssen M. (2007) An impossibility theorem for verisimilitude. Synthese 158(1): 75–92
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Oddie, G. The content, consequence and likeness approaches to verisimilitude: compatibility, trivialization, and underdetermination. Synthese 190, 1647–1687 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9930-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-011-9930-8