Skip to main content
Log in

Is There a “Language of Education“?

  • Published:
Studies in Philosophy and Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What Israel Scheffler analyzed in his The Language of Education was a corpus of slogans and metaphors which obviously influence public communication. But are these a language of “education”? The article argues that “language of education” is a historical enterprise that constitutes a special public discourse on and about education. The writings of the eminent educators developed and reflected this discourse, the language of education is composed out of typical arguments and suggestions not just of slogans and metaphors. And this corpus is historically very stable: The basic arguments are similar and there is little change in the basic creeds of what one can call the public language of education (to be opposed to philosophy of education).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  • Benne, K.D.: 1951, 'Education for Tragedy', Educational Theory 1, pp. 199-210/217, 274-283.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M.: 1944,' Education as Art and Discipline', Ethics 254.

  • Blake, W.: 1977, The Complete Poems, A. Ostriker (ed.) Harmondsworth/Middlesex: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bloom, A 1987, The Closing of the American Mind. How Higher Education has Failed Democracy and Impoverished the Souls of Today's Students, New York: Simon & Schuster

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, Ch.: 1755, Essai de psychologie; ou considerations sur les opérations de l'âme, sue l'habitude et sur l'education.., Londres; repr, Hildesheim/New York: Georg Olms 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charbonnel, N.; 1991, Les aventures de la metaphore, Strasbourg: Presses universitaires de Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Garmo, Chr.: 1985, Herbart and the Herbartians, New York: Scribner & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dilthey, W.: 1888, 'Über die Möglichkeit einer allgemeingültigen pädagogischen Wissenschaft.' In Sitzungsberichte der Königlich Preussischen Akademie der Wissenschaften, Jahrgang 1888; repr. in Gesammelte Schriften, Bd. VI/pp. 56-82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Egan, K.: 1988,' Metaphors in Collision: Objectives, Assembly Lines, and Stories', Curriculum Inquiry 18, pp. 63-86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, W.: 1990,' Über den Mangel an Skepsis in der Päadagogik', Zeitschrift für Pädagogik 36, pp. 729-743.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederick, O.I.: 1941, 'Curriculum Development', In W.S. Monroe (ed): Encyclopedia of Educational Research, New York: The Macmillan Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1978, Ways of Worldmaking, Hassocks/Sussex: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, N.: 1981, Languages of Art. An Approach to a Theory of Symbols, Brighton/Sussex: Harvester Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Graff, G. (1992), 'Teach the Conflicts', In D.J. Gless & B. Hermstein Smith (eds.): The Politics of Liberal Education, Durham/London: Duke University Press, pp. 57-93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grafton, A. and Jardine, L.: 1986, From Humanism to the Humanities. Educations and the Liberal Arts in Fifteenth and Sixteenth-Century Europe, London: Duckworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J.: 1990, Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft. Mit einem Vorwort zur Neuauflage, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirst, PA.: 1993, 'Education, Knowledge and Practices', In R. Barrow & P. White (Eds.): Beyond Liberal Education. Essays in Honour of Paul H. Hirst, London/New York: Routledge, pp. 184-199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hölscher, L.: 1979, Öffentlichkeit und Geheimnis. Eine begriffsgeschichiliche Untersuchung zur Entstehung der Öffentlichkeit in der frühen Neuzeit, Stuttgart: Klett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, D.: 1964, Hidden Riches: Traditional Symbolism from the Renaissance to Blake, London: Eyre & Spottiswoode.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hames, W.: 1909, A Pluralistic Universe. Hibbert Lectures at Manchester College on the Present Situation in Philosophy, New York: Longmans, Green, and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Key, E.: 1909, The Century of the Child. New York/Lond: G.P. Putnam's Sons/The Kniockerbocker Press, repr. New York: Arno Press & The New York Times 1972.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamm-Pineau, E.: 1994, 'Teaching is Performance: Reconceptualizing a Problematic Metaphor'. American Educational Research Journal 31, pp. 3-25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. and Schorr, K.-E. (Eds.): 1992, Zwischen Absicht und Person. Fragen an die Pädagogik, Frankfurt./M.: Sahrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maritain, J.: 1943, Education at the Crossroads, Yale University Press.

  • Meiklejohn, A.: 1942, Education Between Two Worlds, New York/London: Harper & Brothers Publ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills Harper, G.: 1961, The Neoplatonism of William Blake, Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagu, A.: 1981, Growing Young, New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nash, P., Kazamias, A.M. and Perkinson, H.J. (Eds.): 1965, The Educated Man. Studies in the History of Educational Thought, New York/London/Sidney: John Wiley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelkers, J.: 1991, 'Metapher und Wirklichkeit. Die Sprache der Pädagogik als Problem', in J. Oelkers & K. Wegenast (Eds.), Das Symbol — Brücke des Verstehens, Stuttgard/Berlin/Köln: Kohlhammer, pp. 111-124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelkers, J.: 1992, 'Seele und Demiurg: Zur Historischen Genesis pädagogischer Wirkungs-massnahmen', in N. Luhmann & K.E. Schorr (Eds.), Zwischen Absicht und Person. Fragen an die Padagogik, Frankfurt/M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 11-57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oelkers, J. and Osterwalder, F. (Eds.): (1995), Pestalozzi Umfeld und Rezeption. Studien zur Historisierung einer Legende. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osterwalder, F.: 1995, Pestalozzi als pädagogischer Kult. Weinheim/Basel: Beltz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papert, S.: 1993, The Children's Machine, New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reboul, O.: 1984, Le langage d'éducation. Analyse du discours pédagogique, Paris: Presses universitaires de France.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roger, J.: 1971, Les sciences de la vie dans la pensée française du XVIIIe siècle. La génération des arnimaux de Descuites à l'Encyclopédie, Seconde édition complétée. Paris: Armand Colin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, J.-J.: 1969, Ouvres complètes, ed. B. Gagnebin & M. Raymond; t. IV: Emile. Education — Morale — Botanique, Paris: Editions Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I.: 1960, The Language of Education, Springfield Ill.: Charles C. Thomas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, I.: 1985, Of Human Potential. An Essay in the Philosophy of Education, Boston/London/ Melbourne/Henley: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, E. (Ed.): 1984, Metaphors of Education, London: Institute of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Volton, J.W.: 1991, Locke and French Materialism, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziff, P.: 1953, 'The Task of Defining a Work of Art', The Philosophical Review 62.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Oelkers, J. Is There a “Language of Education“?. Studies in Philosophy and Education 16, 125–138 (1997). https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004903105709

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1004903105709

Keywords

Navigation