Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-05T01:16:42.487Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

On Sculpture

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 March 2013

Anthony O'Hear*
Affiliation:
Royal Institute of Philosophyeditor@royalinstituepholosophy.org

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Papers
Copyright
Copyright © The Royal Institute of Philosophy and the contributors 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 cf Aristotle, Metaphysics, V.2; Physics, II.3; Thomas Aquinas, Commentary on Aristotle's Physics, passim. The scholastics made a great deal of the sculptor/sculpture example in their explanations of cause.

2 This quotation and the phrases in the following paragraph are from Ruskin, John's ‘The Nature of then Gothic’, in The Stones of Venice, in The Works of John Ruskin, edited by Cook, E.T. and Wedderburn, A., George Allen, London 1903–12, vol 10, 190Google Scholar.

3 All quotations from Chapter Four of Ruskin's The Bible of Amiens (1880–5), in Ruskin's Work, (loc cit), Vol 33, 147–8 and 169–70.

4 Eduardo Chillida, quoted in Pierre Volboudt, Chillida, (trans. V. Menkes), Harry N. Abrams, New York, 1967, vii–ix.

5 Geoffrey Hill, Scenes From Comus 1.4, Penguin, London, 2005, 4.

6 Epstein, Jacob, Let There Be Sculpture, (Michael Joseph, London, 1942), 154–5Google Scholar.