Abstract
In this paper, I explore the nature of medical interventions like neuromodulation on the complex human experience of love. Love is built upon two fundamental natures, viz: the biological and the psychosocial. As a result of this distinction, scientists, and bioethicists have been exploring the possible ways this complex human experience can be biologically tampered with to produce some supposed higher-order ends like well-being and human flourishing. At the forefront in this quest are Earp, Sandberg and Savulescu whose research works over ten years has focused on the good that could stem from the medicalization of love. I acknowledge the various criticisms that have been made against this stance. However, most of these criticisms have been directed towards the mere side effects and sociocultural disservices that could result from the process of using drugs to influence human romantic relationships and in the end, critiques endorse the medicalization of love on the basis that its benefits outweigh the disadvantages. Consequently, I advance two strands of arguments against “medically-assisted love,” the ontological and the socio-ethical arguments. The former presupposes that beyond the possible side effects of medicalizing love there is something inherently mistaken about this effort and there is something intrinsically different about love that distinguishes it from its medically-engineered alternative. In the latter argument, I claim that drug interventions in romantic love contravene the very nature of medicine. Overall, I believe that critiques were still able to endorse medicalizing love despite their objections because they were only looking at one direction, the physical/cultural complications.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashelford, Sarah, Vanessa Taylor, and Justine Raynsford. 2016. Pathophysiology and pharmacology for nursing students. Los Angeles: Sage Publications.
Earp, Brian D., Anders Sandberg, and Julian Savulescu. 2012. Natural selection, childrearing, and the ethics of marriage (and divorce): Building a case for the neuroenhancement of human relationships. Philosophy & Technology 25 (4): 561–587.
Earp, Brian D., Olga A. Wudarczyk, Anders Sandberg, and Julian Savulescu. 2013. If I could just stop loving you: Anti-love biotechnology and the ethics of a chemical breakup. The American Journal of Bioethics 13 (11): 3–17.
Earp, B.D., A. Sandberg, and J. Savulescu. 2015. The medicalization of love. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24(3): 323–336.
Earp, Brian D., and Savulescu, Julian. 2020. Love is the drug: The chemical future of our relationships. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
Fisher, Helen. 2014. Why we love: The nature and chemistry of romantic love. New York: Henry Holt.
Jenkins, Carrie. 2017. What love is: And what it could be. New York: Basic Books.
Jorgensen, Paul. 2013. Pharmaceuticals, political money, and public policy: A theoretical and empirical agenda. Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 14 (3): 562.
Kolodny, Niko. 2003. Love as valuing a relationship. The Philosophical Review 112 (2): 135–189.
Marcum, James. 2012. Philosophy and medicine: The virtuous physician, vol. 114. Springer: London.
Mathes, Erich. 2016. Love in spite of. In Oxford studies in normative ethics, vol. 6, ed. Mark Timmons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Nelson, Randy. 2010. Hormones and behaviour: Basic concepts. Encyclopedia of Animal Behavior 2: 97–105.
Nyholm, Sven. 2015. The medicalization of love and narrow and broad conceptions of human well-being. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 24: 337–346.
Okwenna, Chrysogonus M. 2020. Mapping out the grounds for african philosophy of medicine and bioethics. Sophia: An African Journal of Philosophy 19 (1): 62–71.
Parens, Erik. 2013. On good and bad forms of medicalization. Bioethics 27 (1): 28–35.
Persson, Ingmar, and Julian Savulescu. 2012. Unfit for the future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Protasi, Sara. 2016. Loving people for who they are: Even when they don’t love you back. European Journal of Philosophy 24 (1): 214–234.
Stegenga, Joseph. 2020. Care and cure: An introduction to philosophy of medicine. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Terbeck, S., and L.P. Chesterman. 2014. Will there ever be a drug with no or negligible side effects? Evidence from neuroscience. Neuroethics 7 (2): 189–194.
Young, L., and H. Zingg. 2009. Cellular and molecular mechanisms of hormone actions on behaviour. In Horsmones, brain and behavior, ed. Donald Pfaff, Arthur Arnold, Anne Etgen, Susan Fahrbach, and Robert Rubin. Cambridge: Elsevier.
Funding
I received no funding for this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
I have no conflict or competing interest to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Okwenna, C.M. Love and romantic relationship in the domain of medicine. Med Health Care and Philos 26, 111–118 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10127-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11019-022-10127-7