Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-wg55d Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-14T03:13:45.230Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Looking Philosophical: Stuff, Stereotypes, and Self‐Presentation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2020

Abstract

Self‐presentation is a complex phenomenon through which individuals present themselves in performance of social roles. The success of such performances rests not just on how well a performer fulfills expectations regarding the role she would play, but on whether observers find her convincing. I focus on how self‐presentation entails making use of material environment and objects: One may “dress for the part” and employ props that suit a desired role. However, regardless of dress or props, one can nonetheless fail to “look the part” owing to expectations informed by biases patterned along commonplace social stereotypes. Using the social role of philosopher as my example, I analyze how the stereotype attached to this role carries implications for how demographically under‐represented philosophers may self‐present, specifically with regard to dress and decoration. I look, in particular, to the alienation from one's material environment that may follow on the frustration of self‐presentation through bias. One pernicious effect of bias, I argue, is the power it has to deform and distort its target's relation to her physical setting and objects. Where comfort and ease in one's material environment can be a significant ethico‐aesthetic good, bias can inhibit access to, and enjoyment of, this good.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by Hypatia, Inc.

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashwell, Lauren, and Langton, Rae. 2011. Slaves to fashion? In Fashion—Philosophy for everyone: Thinking with style, ed. Wolfendale, Jessica and Kennet, Jeanette. New York: Wiley‐Blackwell.Google Scholar
Brennan, Samantha. 2011. Fashion and sexual identity, or why recognition matters. In Fashion—Philosophy for everyone: Thinking with style, ed. Wolfendale, Jessica and Kennet, Jeanette. New York: Wiley‐Blackwell.Google Scholar
Calvino, Italo. 1949. Adventures of a near‐sighted man. In Calvino, difficult loves. Trans. Weaver, William, Colquhoun, Archibald, and Wright, Peggy. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Dotson, Kristie. 2012. How is this paper philosophy? Comparative Philosophy 3 (1): 329.Google Scholar
Feminist, Philosophers. 2013. “I am loving those earrings on you!” February 23. http://feministphilosophers.wordpress.com/2013/02/23/i-am-loving-those-earrings-on-you/#comments (accessed September 2, 2013).Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. Self‐presentation in everyday life. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Gosling, Sam. 2008. Snoop: What your stuff says about you. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hanson, Karen. 1990. Dressing down dressing up: The philosophic fear of fashion. Hypatia 5 (2): 107–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haslanger, Sally. 2008. Changing the ideology and culture of philosophy: Not by reason (alone). Hypatia 23 (2): 210–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lawson, Bill E. 2012. Comment on “Kristie Dotson's ‘How is this Paper Philosophy?’” at Gender, Race, and Philosophy: The Blog, October 30: http://sgrp.typepad.com/sgrp/2012/10/kristie-dotsons-how-is-this-paper-philosophy.html (accessed August 25, 2013).Google Scholar
McCracken, Janet. 2001. Taste and the household: The domestic aesthetic and moral reasoning. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Olberding, Amy. Manuscript. Martha and the masters: Virtuous domestic aesthetic activity.Google Scholar
Patterson, Laura Sloan. 2011. Fashion, out of the closet. Chronicle of Higher Education, June 21. http://chronicle.com/article/Fashion-Out-of-the-Closet/127793/ (accessed June 11, 2014).Google Scholar
Professor or Hobo?” n.d. http://individual.utoronto.ca/somody/quiz.html (accessed August 18, 2013).Google Scholar
Saul, Jennifer. 2013. Implicit bias, stereotype threat and women in philosophy. In Women in philosophy: What needs to change?, ed. Jenkins, Fiona and Hutchison, Katrina. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schuman, Rebecca. 2014. That's “Doctor Instructor” to you. Slate, March 13. http://www.slate.com/articles/life/education/2014/03/what_should_students_call_their_college_professors.html (accessed April 27, 2014).Google Scholar
Schwitzgebel, Eric. 2010. On being good at seeming smart. The splintered mind (blog). http://schwitzsplinters.blogspot.ca/2010/03/on-being-good-at-seeming-smart.html (accessed June 23, 2015).Google Scholar
Segesten, Anamaria Dutceac. 2014. The fashionable academic. Inside Higher Education, May 11. https://www.insidehighered.com/blogs/university-venus/fashionable-academic (accessed July 16, 2014).Google Scholar